Doepfer

How is it going with the software actually??I see today is the 16th ;-)

all the best,

Ernst



On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Daniel Ornelas <danny@anadeji.com> wrote:

>
>
> Howdy A-100 List!
> Sorry for the _slow_ communications, I've been busy with life stuff! I've
> gotten loading / unloading working under OS X, but there are a few kinks
> that absolutely need to be worked out before I have something I can share.
>
> I'm going to set a padded and realistic date of July 15th 2009 as the
> useable release date, at which I'll make an announcement on the list.
>
> I promise it'll be a wonderful contribution to the Doepfer continuum, just
> hang tight!
>
> Thanks,
> Danny of Anadeji
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:26 PM, achtung_999 <
> heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com <heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > to have this on OS X would be sweet..
> > Is it anywhere near finished?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, j_inform3r <abstract.express@gmail.com<abstract.express%40gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet? I've been away for at
> > > least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did
> everyone
> > > drop the ball on this one? Am I the ONLY one who wants this software
> for
> > > Mac? If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would
> happen
> > > already! :)
> > >
> > > -John
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi John,
> > >>
> > >> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic
> > >> transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite
> > >> busy at work.
> > >>
> > >> I believe someone else on the list had something working also
> (anyone?)
> > >>
> > >> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version,
> > with
> > >> any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the
> > >> next 2 weeks!
> > >>
> > >> Godspeed
> > >> ~Danny
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
> > >> > Hey guys,
> > >> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful
> for
> > so
> > >> > many users.
> > >> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
> > >> >
> > >> > Best Regards,
> > >> > John
> > >> >
> > >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com<Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Howdy,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I
> just
> > >> > > acquired this module :)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ~Danny
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@>
> > >> > > <hardware@> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> > >> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> > >> > > >> their former users.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed
> by
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > members of this group !
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as
> > we
> > >> > > > have no
> > >> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming.
> I
> > >> > > > have
> > >> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note
> on
> > >> > > > our
> > >> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no
> > >> > > > short-term
> > >> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to
> > program
> > >> > > > such a
> > >> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> > >> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a
> > >> > > > discussion on a
> > >> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board
> > for
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you
> > >> > > > cannot accuse
> > >> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep
> in
> > >> > > > mind that
> > >> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the
> MAQ16/3
> > >> > > > (8051
> > >> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable.
> > Even
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit
> > >> > > > display) limit
> > >> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view
> > even
> > >> > > > with the
> > >> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> > >> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Best wishes
> > >> > > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Daniel Ornelas
> > >> > > danny@
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]