Doepfer

So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet? I've been away for at least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did everyone drop the ball on this one? Am I the ONLY one who wants this software for Mac? If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would happen already! :)

-John

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
> 
> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite 
> busy at work.
> 
> I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone?)
> 
> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version, with any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the 
> next 2 weeks!
> 
> Godspeed
> ~Danny
> 
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for so many users. 
> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > John
> > 
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Howdy,
> > > 
> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just  
> > > acquired this module :)
> > > 
> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> > > 
> > > ~Danny
> > > 
> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@>  
> > > <hardware@> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> > > >> their former users.
> > > >
> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by the
> > > > members of this group !
> > > >
> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we  
> > > > have no
> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I have
> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on our
> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no  
> > > > short-term
> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program  
> > > > such a
> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
> > > >
> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
> > > >
> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a  
> > > > discussion on a
> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for  
> > > > the
> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you  
> > > > cannot accuse
> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in  
> > > > mind that
> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3  
> > > > (8051
> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even  
> > > > the
> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit  
> > > > display) limit
> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even  
> > > > with the
> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
> > > >
> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> > > >
> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes
> > > > Dieter Doepfer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Daniel Ornelas
> > > danny@
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> >
>