Hi Jose, if you want to transport the system to stage or other venues, you shouldn't take anything else but the portable suitcase. The Monsterrack is not very comfortable, if you have to transport it on your own. If you want to use it only in the studio I'd suggest something like the standard racks in a self built frame or something completely DIY'ed like those: http://www.doepfer.de/A100_custom.htm I have two standard racks built in a simple cabinet-like wood rack for my studio (http://fa.utfs.org/img/rack_A100_blitz.jpg), one Doepfer portable rack for live, and finally I use a single rack as real portable system http://fa.utfs.org/diy/a100/index.html (or http://weltklang-music.de/html/body_langenacht2004.html) Florian José Sogo Flores wrote: > Hi, > > The time is come to start thinking about expanding my Doepfer system. Now we > have 4 options: monster case, standard rack case, portable case and low-cost > case. Considering money is not an issue and you are thinking in terms of > having at the end about 4-6 times the number of modules in a standard case, > wich pros and cons do you find for every option? I don't need the Doepfer to > be rackmounted. > > Thanks for your opinions in advance. > > Best regards > > Jose > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- Florian Anwander |ConSol Tel. +49(89)45841-133 |Consulting&Solutions Software GmbH Fax +49(89)45841-111 |Franziskanerstr. 38, D-81669 München email: florian.anwander@consol.de |http://www.consol.de
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Monster case, standard case, ... opinions wanted
2008-02-22 by Florian Anwander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.