Doepfer

Hi Stuart,

I think, I know what you want to say.

The reality of a divider after reset is:
Stepnumber  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
      clock .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.
         /2 ...11..11..11..11
         /4 .......1111....11

But you want

Stepnumber  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
      clock .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.
         /2 .11..11..11..11..
         /4 .1111....1111....

And the best thing for percussion triggering would be

Stepnumber  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
      clock .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.
         /2 .1...1...1...1...
         /3 .1.....1.....1...
         /4 .1.......1.......

This would require a lot of hardware if it would be realised with 
standard logic chips, but should be a easy job with a PIC.

A long time ago I already asked in a poll for a multi purpose 
masterclock module.

Should have

Internal Clock,

MIDI-Clock-In/Out,

DIN-Sync-In/Out,

16th, 96th, 192th Clock In/Out,

Triggers out like in the last example above, with highest rate as 32th 
(if the master clock is fast enough) and longest should be 2 bars (in 4/4).
The trigger outs must be available all at the same time (not a single 
out with a rate selector).

Additionally the modul should provide a swing factor (but not as rough 
as in the jomox Xbases); this should be possible for all clock modes 
with the exception "slave of 16th-Clock in".




Florian


Stu Grimshaw wrote:

> hallo mark,
> 
> there are different things that i'm after, but an easy one to follow
> is having several envelopes, one of which should fire off at every
> quarter, one of which at every bar etc. after a reset/start they
> should all fire off on the 1, and then keep going at their respective
> intervals. quite the opposite happens with the a190, since the all the
> gates start off with "off".
> 
> to express it in binary terms, directly after a start i have 00000000
> when what i need is 11111111.
> 
> this is the reverse of the a190's behaviour. dieter, can this be
> hacked? very unlikely, i know, but if you don't ask you don't get :)
> 
> cheers,
> 
> stu
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Mark Pulver <mark@...> wrote:
> 
>>
>>Ummm, what's the net effect that you're looking for?
>>
>>When I look at splitting up a clock and dividing it, I'm looking to
> 
> create 
> 
>>something like a timed sequence of sweeps, or even using a divider as a 
>>subharmonic generator.
>>
>>So, feed a square at, say, 120hz then pick a tap at 1/2 for
> 
> once/second and 
> 
>>feed that into an EG. Then pick a tap at 1/4 for once/2 seconds and
> 
> feed 
> 
>>that into another EG or an LFO reset, etc. The next effect in the
> 
> patch is 
> 
>>a number of sequenced "things" happening...
>>
>>Are you looking to do something different?
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Florian Anwander                  |ConSol
Tel.   +49(89)45841-133           |Consulting&Solutions Software GmbH
Fax    +49(89)45841-111           |Franziskanerstr. 38, D-81669 München
email: florian.anwander@consol.de |http://www.consol.de