Thank you very much partlydrone, stu and florian! The instrument I have in mind is indeed a bass clarinet, which is played wonderfully by a friend of mine. But I would like to use this setup with other instruments, such as electric guitar, tenor saxophone or even vocals. I play in a free improvisation group and would like to use the modules there (I normally use Audiomulch to create sounds and process instruments) I guess the BBD is definitely on the shopping list now. So is the A-137 - I'll have to ask Schneidersbuero if they would go for a swap. The digital modules (A112 and the bitcrushers) are interesting, but they are easily done within the computer (including CV control with Pluggo by Cycling 74). I would like to keep this process as analog as possible. The phaser was only interesting for the CV input, but it's not on the list anymore. I wanted the noise/random module for the random part, but I am open to other suggestions. Florian, can you please elaborate on the use of A160,161 or the A151. I am totally unfamiliar with these modules and cannot imagine how I could use them in my setup. An example that contains some of the modules mentioned here would be very useful. What would happen if an instrument, a clarinet or tenor sax, is fed directly into a PLL? You can assume that the instrumentalists are virtuosos and can play whatever is required. I am looking for radical changes - I would prefer terrible pitch tracking to very good pitch tracking. I can already use the Quad LFO as an oscillator, but would like to modulate the frequency and hence want the A-110. Envelope out from A-119 would be a nice modulation source for the A-110, I guess. The S&H is the A-148.Slew limiters are 170 and 171. 170 has two, 171 has CV control. Which one should I get? I'm usually a numbers guy and assume 2 is better than 1. I do have one Multiplier. Thanks once more! I have already a much better idea. I'll try to put all your suggestions together and see what comes out (in functionality and in Euros) Best, Korhan On 3/2/08, Florian Anwander <Florian.Anwander@consol.de> wrote: > > Hi Korhan > > > I use these modules to process instruments as well as for sound design > > (using the LFOs as oscillators). I have been planning to expand this > > system to process acoustic instruments during live performance, and I > > consider the following modules: > > > > A-106 Xtreme Filter > > A-110 VCO > > A-114 Ring Mod > > A-118 Noise/Random > > A-125 Phaser > > A-127 VC Triple Res. Filter > > A-175 Dual Inverter > > A-188-1 BBD (1024) > > A-196 PLL > > > What can it > > do to a bass clarinet plugged into it? > OK, I assume your instrument is woodwind (bass clarinet, but maybe > others like saxophon). > > So my definite recommendation is: > A-188 any BBD (which one is matter of taste) not for flanger, but for > standing resonances, karplusstrong stuff... > > A-137 Waveshaper. This is a MUST for a monophonic acoustic instrument. I > do not know whether you work already with some kind of distortion, but > this one goes far beyond all you could think until now about distortion. > And while the most synth audio modules require very constant sound, the > waveshaper shows its real pwoer with dynamic input material from ppp to > fff. > > A-114 as Ring modulator is very nice, but it is only one single sound, > which could be achived very similar also by audiomodulation of a filter > or VCA. > > A-106 with a clearinet I'd go instead for the A-101-1. > > The A-196 can(!) be very interesting with an clarinet, but don't be > disappointed, if you find, that it is too extreme. If you want the > original PLL usage (transpose frequencies), then a guitar stompbox or a > Boss RPS10 might be interesting too. > > A-110 is ok (but modify it so you can tune it through the full range > witht he pot) > > Cancel the A-127 you already have two filters, you don't need this. > > Cancel the A-125, and get instead a used guitar stompbox. > > instead: more CV sources which make your play vivid: > -> Get a Sample and Hold and a Slew Limiter, i think there is a AS combi > module. > > Some kind of analogue sequencer, not the A155, but maybe a A160/161 or a > A151 plus a mixer. > > Trigger them by the gate out from the 119, and each note will have a > different sound. > > finally: you will be in need of multiples. So don't forget them. > > Florian > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Modules for acoustic instrument processing
2008-03-02 by Korhan Erel
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.