Doepfer

Mark,
 
I can understand where your coming from. I also understand that this is
the A100 forum and Bakis has the last word on what gets posted.
 
80% of my modules are Doepfer (about 100ish last count) and because of
functionality, price and quality will always be my first choice.
 
However I also have modules by Plan_B, Bananalogue, Voxglitch, Analogue
Systems, Analogue Solutions, Oakley and Blacet in my rig. And in the
future I'd like to include more of these manufacturers plus The Harvest
Man, Cweman and any other manufacturer that produces a module of
interest.
 
Other makers have been discussed in the list before but there are other
forums that cover modular synths that are not product specific like
Wigglers. 
 
I will always bow to the moderators wishes.
 
Best wishes
 
David
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * *
David Salter
Senior Consultant


Thomson Reuters

O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402
M 07990562402

david.salter@thomsonreuters.com
thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/> 

 

________________________________

From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Mark Pulver
Sent: 25 April 2008 16:47
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] New Product - Tiptop Audio Z5000




Regarding posting this up on the Doepfer list...

I thought about that long and hard before doing it, I mean no disrespect
to 
Dieter in specific and Doepfer in general.

I bet that most of the folks on this list have non-Doepfer modules in
their 
rig, and this module doesn't cross paths with anything currently offered
by 
Doepfer. It's a choice... just like the long list of modules coming out 
from all sorts of folks these days.

(more babble coming for the rest of the folks)

Mark
------
Floppy (02:39 AM 4/25/2008) wrote:
>thats right,
>
>it looks really boring, like a behringer multifx in euro format.
>but the most disturbing to me is the discussion about it on the doepfer
>list.



 


This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]