Thank you Dieter Rgds david * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David Salter Senior Consultant Thomson Reuters O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402 M 07990562402 david.salter@thomsonreuters.com thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/> ________________________________ From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of hardware@doepfer.de Sent: 20 May 2008 13:58 To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: blew up headphones? + lfo 1 vs 2 > That's great Dieter, > > How do different capacitor value affect the range in time, i.e. if I > replaced 100nF with 1000nF or 10nF what sort of difference would I > notice? 100nF -> 1000nF = tenfold the time or period 100nF -> 10nF = tenth part of the time or period > I was thinking that if it's a large difference to make a little pcb and > have an additional switch to change from standard to new value. > > Thanks > > David The capacitor value is proportional to the time or period (e.g. doubling the capacitor value even doubles the time or period, when the capacitor value is increased tenfold even the time or period increases tenfold). Best wishes Dieter Doepfer This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Doepfer_a100] Re: blew up headphones? + lfo 1 vs 2
2008-05-20 by David Salter
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.