Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

RE: [Doepfer_a100] Re: blew up headphones? + lfo 1 vs 2

2008-05-20 by David Salter

Thank you Dieter
 
Rgds
 
david
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * *
David Salter
Senior Consultant


Thomson Reuters

O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402
M 07990562402

david.salter@thomsonreuters.com
thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/> 

 

________________________________

From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of hardware@doepfer.de
Sent: 20 May 2008 13:58
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: blew up headphones? + lfo 1 vs 2



> That's great Dieter,
>
> How do different capacitor value affect the range in time, i.e. if I
> replaced 100nF with 1000nF or 10nF what sort of difference would I
> notice?

100nF -> 1000nF = tenfold the time or period
100nF -> 10nF = tenth part of the time or period

> I was thinking that if it's a large difference to make a little pcb
and
> have an additional switch to change from standard to new value.
>
> Thanks
>
> David

The capacitor value is proportional to the time or period (e.g. doubling
the
capacitor value even doubles the time or period, when the capacitor
value is
increased tenfold even the time or period increases tenfold).

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer



 


This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.