Doepfer

Hi Peter and all the others,

> I know this is going to quiver some lips here, but why would
> anyone need an ANALOG delay when didgital delays are so
> abundantly more functional?
I own both (Sony D7, Korg SDD-1200, VestaFire on the digital side and a
Dynacord VRS-23 with so called "Bucket Bridge Devices" as delay chips on
the analogue side) and I have to admit I love(!) the sound of the Dynacord.
I use the VRS-23 in every mix. It makes every sound warm and rich; similar
to the unreached Roland Dimension-D.

But: The Dynacord uses very advanced circuits. There is a Kompander, a
Hi-Freq Adaption and a very sensitive tunable input circuit for the BBDs. A
simple BBD Delay, that lacks all this effort, does sound like someone here
described the corresponding AS-Module: "it sounds always like Adrian
Belew".

So the R+D Effort would be quite high. Also I fear, that it is quite
uncertain whether BBDs will stay in production for a longer period - which
is a NoGo-argument for every producer.

And finally we have to see, that with the A-112 already provides the
possibility of a digital delay.

So I subscribe Peters view:
> I would like to see Dieter's R+D effrots going into other areas
> personally.

Florian
-- 
Florian Anwander                  |ConSol*  HP-Support
Tel.   +49.89.45841-133           |Consulting&Solutions Software GmbH
Fax    +49.89.45841-139           |Franziskanerstr. 38, D-81669 München
email: florian.anwander@consol.de |http://www.consol.de