Doepfer

Sorry Richard, it wasn't personal.I just noticed a lot of people are asking
for so many features.
If Doepfer can keep the modules cheap and simple I can buy several copies of
them and therby make my patches more complex..
That's just my train of thought..

greets,

Ernst



On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Richard Scott <richard_scott@rwnc.co.uk>wrote:

>   of course experimentation is the name of the game: but this thread did
> come from me asking if there was anyone making modules with VC feedback and
> VC mix so don't shoot me for wanting to have them on a future doepfer
> module! I want something to mount it in a beauty case as an independent
> delay processor so there won't be much room for so many other modules
>
> I personally want a machine to perform on and full modularity is not always
> the best solution for that, which is why I love the VCS3, certain Analogue
> Solutions modules which tend to cram in a lot of CV control along with
> prepatched VCAs mixers - also the Mooger Foogers do this. I'd like a very
> flexible delay to modulate the shit out of with analogue sequencers and that
> I don't need to use external VCAs and mixers everytime i use it... maybe the
> Harvestman and Analogue Systems modules will be better for me... though
> twice or more the cost
>
> of course having something simple and cheap will be a more friendly idea to
> other users
>
> Richard
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: achtung_999
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 2:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay
>
> I understand your point completely, and I would like VC feedback also.But I
> was mainly trying to push the people to think more before they start to
> inflate and overfeaturize cheap modules that Dieter suggests.
>
> ;-)
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Denis Gökdag <q-art@gmx.net<q-art%40gmx.net>>
> wrote:
>
> > sure, i see your point in general, but adding two sockets for the
> > feedback insert isn't a lot of work/space/money and definitely no
> > roland-JV-erising thing ;-)
> >
> > especially with VC feedback being a pretty common task you can save a
> > lot of patching with these two sockets. all you need to do is insert
> > a VCA, eliminating a mixer in front of the delay input and a multiple
> > at the module output (which, being unbuffered, isn't such a phantastic
> > option in terms os sound quality, depending on what else is fed by
> > this chain). in terms of signal fidelity you also benefit: one less
> > amplification/mixing stage in the signal path (as there already *is* a
> > mixer in the delay module that sums input and feedback).
> >
> > to me, "modular" means flexible, not "tedious" ;-)
> >
> > my 2 opamps,
> > d
> >
> >
> > On Aug 15, 2008, at 1:31 PM, achtung_999 wrote:
> > >
> > >> Come on.You have a modular synthesizer. Experiment!
> > >> I'm getting a bit worried about the ongoing trend on this list.
> > >> The trend of people wanting modules that have all the options build
> > >> in.
> > >> Too much build in features are beyond the scope of a modular.
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> --
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> It has removed 945 spam emails to date.
> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]