--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <yahoo@...> wrote: > > > Y-cables will do the same thing. They even make one with three inputs/ > > outputs. I guess you could call it a pitchfork cable. And you can > > stack them for unboundedly many summands/splits. > > > > Monroe > > Of course this is an alternatives to multiples. But you will need different > types of Y or pitchfork cables to cover all applications (i.e. different > combinations of cable length and number of "fork teeth"). A multiple is much > more flexible in this regard as you can combine it with the patch cables you > want. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > I use both. Y-cables for more permanent routings and multiples for more contingent patches. I, personally, would find it difficult to use just Y-cables. It would be possible but not that easy/fast/flexible way for me. - Markus
Message
Re: who needs multiples?
2008-08-27 by ysinollaysi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.