> > Yeah, I'm seriously eyeing the Malgorithm. The idea of being to > modulate the sampling frequency really sounds like a lot of fun. So > you're saying you can ring-mod a signal with itself and you'll > basically get a higher frequency version of itself? Exactly. If the ringmod is a "clean" circuit the sound will be true to the original. The modDemod is not a clean circuit, and so the octave up is "crunchy." Additionally, you may get aggressie sounds by tuning 2 VCO to intervals and using one as program and the other as carrier, applied to a ringmod or balanced modulator as some like to call them. TOny > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Anthony Rolando > <goldenechos@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > If you have not already got the sounds you like, try a ring mod and/ or the > > Malgorithm. > > > > On the ring-mod tip I (of course) recommend the modDemod. > > In addition to ring mod effects it does a wickedly crunchy octave up, and > > sounds wonderfully ominous on human voice. > > > > To do octave up just mult a signal into both the program and carrier blend > > the output with the original signal using a mixer. If you start with a lower > > octave sine or triangle you will get great results as the octave up coming > > from the modDemod is clipped and will ride aggressively on top of the lower > > octave triangle. > > > > TOny > > > >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > >> From: techmaster@gmail.com > >> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:17:25 +0000 > >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing? > >> > >> Here is my modular as of now: > >> > >> A110 - VCO > >> A110 - VCO > >> A145 - LFO1 > >> A146 - LFO2 > >> A138b - Log Mixer > >> A140 - ADSR > >> A140 - ADSR > >> A131 - Exp. VCA > >> A180 - Multiples > >> A180 - Multiples > >> A190 - MIDI Interface > >> A102 - Diode LPF > >> A124 - WASP Filter > >> A137 - Wave Multiplier > >> Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF > >> > >> This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the > >> Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit. > >> > >> Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot. It's > >> definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what > >> else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful. So far, this > >> thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest. It does not sound > >> like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I > >> know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some > >> key element to fatten it up. Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need > >> the A-115 divider/suboscillator module. But is that it? If it helps, > >> I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal. Is > >> the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go > >> "WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as > >> well? > >> > >> Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you > >> "typically" patch that in? Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer, > >> then sub-oscillate the mixed signal? Or do you just sub-oscillate one > >> oscillator, pre-mixer? > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------ > >> > >> Yahoo! Groups Links > >> > >> > >> > > > > __________________________________________________________ > > You live life beyond your PC. So now Windows goes beyond your PC. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298556/direct/01/ > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > -- > Chris Jones > http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > _________________________________________________________________ When your life is on the go�take your life with you. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?
2008-10-24 by Anthony Rolando
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.