Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

What am I missing?

What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by techmaster242

Here is my modular as of now:

A110 - VCO
A110 - VCO
A145 - LFO1
A146 - LFO2
A138b - Log Mixer
A140 - ADSR
A140 - ADSR
A131 - Exp. VCA
A180 - Multiples
A180 - Multiples
A190 - MIDI Interface
A102 - Diode LPF
A124 - WASP Filter
A137 - Wave Multiplier
Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF

This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.

Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot.  It's
definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful.  So far, this
thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest.  It does not sound
like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I
know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
key element to fatten it up.  Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
the A-115 divider/suboscillator module.  But is that it?  If it helps,
I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal.  Is
the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
"WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as
well?

Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
"typically" patch that in?  Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
then sub-oscillate the mixed signal?  Or do you just sub-oscillate one
oscillator, pre-mixer?
Thanks!

Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by argitoth

I think you need to step back and really think about what kind of 
sound you're trying to create with your synth. What you seem to lack 
may be physical (not the right module) and it may also be mental (your 
understanding of how to create X sound).

First thing I noticed is that you don't have a VC ADSR. However, you 
can get similar effects by combining two ADSRs into the same input. 
You can get really snappy envelopes that way. You can also get a 
snappy sound by sending one envelope to modulate the pitch of an osc  
and the other to modulate the filter. Another thing about ADSRs is 
that you should make use of the sustain and release to create nice 
envelope shapes.

I think if your $2000 synth doesn't sound like $2000 it could be your 
quality of filters. I would love to hear the A-102 and A-124. I know 
the Polivoks it good... well that's what everyone says.

Second thing is that you should understand how to make your synth 
scream. Bandpass and notch is where it's at! I used to think lowpass 
filters make synths scream. I was wrong! Create feedback patches by 
multiplying a filter's output to go into itself with a saw wave and 
out to your speaker, use notch or bandpass. Now invert the signal 
going back into the filter... it's really confusing IMO. But it 
doesn't look like any of your modules can invert a signal.

Here's how the Model 12 sounds with inverted feedback: 
http://www.elanhickler.com/misc/model_12_scream2.mp3

Another thing is that you don't have any real way to create the 
classic screamy sync sound. Actually, you can use an envelope. Patch 
it into the pitch control instead of patching your CV1 from your midi 
module. Turn release, decay, and attack to 0. Use the sustain knob to 
manually modulate the pitch.

Lastly, a few modules have already been suggested; the A-137 and A-
188. Those modules are good to have, yes, but I don't think they move 
your synth in the immediate direction you want to go, and that is fat 
and hard sounds. What I suggest is an oakley overdrive to help your 
filters scream: http://www.oakleysound.co.uk/overdrv.htm You need to 
ask the oakley guy if he can make you a eurorack overdrive. It may 
take a little more than a month for you to get it. I ordered my own 
just yesterday.

I would suggest a saw animator to create supersaw sounds, but it looks 
like there's none available. E-mail Cynthia about it: http://www.cyndustries.com/modules_sawtooth.cfm

Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by Mark Pulver

I'd say that you need a deeper sonic palette... Something like:

http://www.doepfer.de/A137.htm

That's a pretty nice module to get some way serious harmonics happening.

The A-115 is nice, it'll help with the sub-bass stuff, but the net result 
is a square wave which isn't all that exciting harmonically. To get the 
A-115 running, you split a signal out of your VCO and drive it directly. 
Or, you can use a SAW or SQUARE output if it's not alrady busy in a patch.


Mark
-----
techmaster242 (08:17 AM 10/23/2008) wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
 >Here is my modular as of now:
 >
 >A110 - VCO
 >A110 - VCO
 >A145 - LFO1
 >A146 - LFO2
 >A138b - Log Mixer
 >A140 - ADSR
 >A140 - ADSR
 >A131 - Exp. VCA
 >A180 - Multiples
 >A180 - Multiples
 >A190 - MIDI Interface
 >A102 - Diode LPF
 >A124 - WASP Filter
 >A137 - Wave Multiplier
 >Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF
 >
 >This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
 >Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.
 >
 >Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot.  It's
 >definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
 >else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful.  So far, this
 >thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest.  It does not sound
 >like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I
 >know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
 >key element to fatten it up.  Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
 >the A-115 divider/suboscillator module.  But is that it?  If it helps,
 >I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal.  Is
 >the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
 >"WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as
 >well?
 >
 >Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
 >"typically" patch that in?  Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
 >then sub-oscillate the mixed signal?  Or do you just sub-oscillate one
 >oscillator, pre-mixer?
 >Thanks!
 >
 >
 >------------------------------------
 >
 >Yahoo! Groups Links
 >
 >
 >

Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by Os

another range of modules to whet your appetite, that I don't see
mentioned very often:

http://www.cwejman.net/cwejman.net/modular.htm

there's some really nice stuff in there.


cheers,
os.


2008/10/23 techmaster242 <techmaster@gmail.com>:
> Here is my modular as of now:
>
> A110 - VCO
> A110 - VCO
> A145 - LFO1
> A146 - LFO2
> A138b - Log Mixer
> A140 - ADSR
> A140 - ADSR
> A131 - Exp. VCA
> A180 - Multiples
> A180 - Multiples
> A190 - MIDI Interface
> A102 - Diode LPF
> A124 - WASP Filter
> A137 - Wave Multiplier
> Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF
>
> This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
> Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.
>
> Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot. It's
> definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
> else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful. So far, this
> thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest. It does not sound
> like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I
> know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
> key element to fatten it up. Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
> the A-115 divider/suboscillator module. But is that it? If it helps,
> I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal. Is
> the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
> "WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as
> well?
>
> Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
> "typically" patch that in? Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
> then sub-oscillate the mixed signal? Or do you just sub-oscillate one
> oscillator, pre-mixer?
> Thanks!
>
> 



-- 
os@collective.co.uk
http://www.darkroomtheband.net/
http://www.expert-sleepers.co.uk/

Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by Florian Anwander

Hi

As Mark already did, I recommend the A-137 too. Additionally I'd like to 
suggest the A-188-1 Series with 1024 stage BBDs (or less stages - I'd 
prefer 256).

Florian

Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by Bakis Sirros

invest time and labour with your modular, to find the 'sweet spots' with the modules you have to create some magical sounds....     :-)
the a137, you already have, needs work and practice, btw...
 
also, you are (maybe) missing a, basic but usefull at times, 'warm' 24db lowpass filter like the A108, or the A105 24 db SSM filter., as you seem to have focused on the weirder designs (diode filter, polyvoks, wasp...)
 

Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece

--- On Thu, 10/23/08, techmaster242 <techmaster@gmail.com> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: techmaster242 <techmaster@gmail.com>
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 6:17 PM






Here is my modular as of now:

A110 - VCO
A110 - VCO
A145 - LFO1
A146 - LFO2
A138b - Log Mixer
A140 - ADSR
A140 - ADSR
A131 - Exp. VCA
A180 - Multiples
A180 - Multiples
A190 - MIDI Interface
A102 - Diode LPF
A124 - WASP Filter
A137 - Wave Multiplier
Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF

This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.

Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot. It's
definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful. So far, this
thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest. It does not sound
like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I
know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
key element to fatten it up. Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
the A-115 divider/suboscillat or module. But is that it? If it helps,
I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal. Is
the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
"WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as
well?

Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
"typically" patch that in? Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
then sub-oscillate the mixed signal? Or do you just sub-oscillate one
oscillator, pre-mixer?
Thanks!

 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by Don Kim

I think you need a ringmod.  Do the 110's have a FM jack?  Maybe at
least one better oscillator like Doepfer 111, or PlanB Model 15, or
Analogue Systems 95.  You can get some low harmonic sounds using FM or
a ringmod. Do the 110's have sync?  I don't own a 111 or 110, so I
don't know, but sync would help fatten up your sound too.

An animated square wave width sounds pretty fat, I don't know if
you've tried that.

Have any samples of how fat a sound you've gotten, and maybe people
could use that as a starting point/frame of reference?

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by achtung_999

I'm sure you have tried PWM on the a110 ?A slight bit of PWM always fattens
any oscillator up.
I would also get some more modulation sources.
An A147 is nice because they have VC for the frequency setting.
And my pesonal favourite modulation source is the A149-1 great for
semi-random type modulations.

Greetings,

Ernst




On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Don Kim <dkimcg@gmail.com> wrote:

>   I think you need a ringmod. Do the 110's have a FM jack? Maybe at
> least one better oscillator like Doepfer 111, or PlanB Model 15, or
> Analogue Systems 95. You can get some low harmonic sounds using FM or
> a ringmod. Do the 110's have sync? I don't own a 111 or 110, so I
> don't know, but sync would help fatten up your sound too.
>
> An animated square wave width sounds pretty fat, I don't know if
> you've tried that.
>
> Have any samples of how fat a sound you've gotten, and maybe people
> could use that as a starting point/frame of reference?
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by techmaster@gmail.com

That actually gives me an idea, no idea why I haven't thought of it before, but I could mix a saw and a pwm'd square from the same vco.  I've mixed saw and square from the same vco, for some reason I guess I was assuming since pwm only affects the square that I'd only use the square.  I'll have to try that.

Also, what module would you use to invert a cv signal?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:52:05 
To: <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?


I'm sure you have tried PWM on the a110 ?A slight bit of PWM always fattens
any oscillator up.
I would also get some more modulation sources.
An A147 is nice because they have VC for the frequency setting.
And my pesonal favourite modulation source is the A149-1 great for
semi-random type modulations.

Greetings,

Ernst




On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Don Kim <dkimcg@gmail.com> wrote:

>   I think you need a ringmod. Do the 110's have a FM jack? Maybe at
> least one better oscillator like Doepfer 111, or PlanB Model 15, or
> Analogue Systems 95. You can get some low harmonic sounds using FM or
> a ringmod. Do the 110's have sync? I don't own a 111 or 110, so I
> don't know, but sync would help fatten up your sound too.
>
> An animated square wave width sounds pretty fat, I don't know if
> you've tried that.
>
> Have any samples of how fat a sound you've gotten, and maybe people
> could use that as a starting point/frame of reference?
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by achtung_999

The A175 voltage inverter does the job.But the A138c polarizing mixer or the
A133 Polarizer can be used too.
Be careful with setting the amp amount on these last ones though..


Greetings,

Ernst

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:51 PM, <techmaster@gmail.com> wrote:

>   That actually gives me an idea, no idea why I haven't thought of it
> before, but I could mix a saw and a pwm'd square from the same vco. I've
> mixed saw and square from the same vco, for some reason I guess I was
> assuming since pwm only affects the square that I'd only use the square.
> I'll have to try that.
>
> Also, what module would you use to invert a cv signal?
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:52:05
> To: <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>>
> Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
>
>
> I'm sure you have tried PWM on the a110 ?A slight bit of PWM always fattens
>
> any oscillator up.
> I would also get some more modulation sources.
> An A147 is nice because they have VC for the frequency setting.
> And my pesonal favourite modulation source is the A149-1 great for
> semi-random type modulations.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Ernst
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Don Kim <dkimcg@gmail.com<dkimcg%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > I think you need a ringmod. Do the 110's have a FM jack? Maybe at
> > least one better oscillator like Doepfer 111, or PlanB Model 15, or
> > Analogue Systems 95. You can get some low harmonic sounds using FM or
> > a ringmod. Do the 110's have sync? I don't own a 111 or 110, so I
> > don't know, but sync would help fatten up your sound too.
> >
> > An animated square wave width sounds pretty fat, I don't know if
> > you've tried that.
> >
> > Have any samples of how fat a sound you've gotten, and maybe people
> > could use that as a starting point/frame of reference?
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by techmaster242

The A-102 and A-124 sound amazing.  Equally as aggressive as the
Polivoks, and less than half the price.  I'm 100% positive my problem
doesn't lie in the filters.  It's what I'm putting into them.  

Everybody is saying to get an A-137, but I already have one.  LOL  I'm
kind of confused though, because if you fold a saw wave, you basically
get a ramp wave, but with lower amperage.  If you fold a square wave,
you get a square wave, once again with lower amperage.  You basically
can't fold any wave with vertical elements, so you're stuck with
folding triangle and sine waves, and neither one sounds very
spectacular to me.  Honestly, I bought the A-137 to be a drum effects
unit, and it is no slouch in that department.  I absolutely love it
for effecting drums.

When you all say to sync the VCO's, what do I sync them to?  Do I
split the gate and sync them both to that?  Or run, say, VCO1's square
into VCA2's sync input?  I've already played with syncing the LFO to a
VCO, and that fattens things up a bit, I just want more.  :)  If I
tune both VCO's the same, and set their octave switches one octave
apart, it sounds a bit thicker, since the sound covered two octaves
instead of one, so I'm thinking the A-115 will give me the same
benefit, freeing up the second VCO to simply reinforce what the first
VCO is playing.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "argitoth" <argitoth@...> wrote:
>
> I think you need to step back and really think about what kind of 
> sound you're trying to create with your synth. What you seem to lack 
> may be physical (not the right module) and it may also be mental (your 
> understanding of how to create X sound).
> 
> First thing I noticed is that you don't have a VC ADSR. However, you 
> can get similar effects by combining two ADSRs into the same input. 
> You can get really snappy envelopes that way. You can also get a 
> snappy sound by sending one envelope to modulate the pitch of an osc  
> and the other to modulate the filter. Another thing about ADSRs is 
> that you should make use of the sustain and release to create nice 
> envelope shapes.
> 
> I think if your $2000 synth doesn't sound like $2000 it could be your 
> quality of filters. I would love to hear the A-102 and A-124. I know 
> the Polivoks it good... well that's what everyone says.
> 
> Second thing is that you should understand how to make your synth 
> scream. Bandpass and notch is where it's at! I used to think lowpass 
> filters make synths scream. I was wrong! Create feedback patches by 
> multiplying a filter's output to go into itself with a saw wave and 
> out to your speaker, use notch or bandpass. Now invert the signal 
> going back into the filter... it's really confusing IMO. But it 
> doesn't look like any of your modules can invert a signal.
> 
> Here's how the Model 12 sounds with inverted feedback: 
> http://www.elanhickler.com/misc/model_12_scream2.mp3
> 
> Another thing is that you don't have any real way to create the 
> classic screamy sync sound. Actually, you can use an envelope. Patch 
> it into the pitch control instead of patching your CV1 from your midi 
> module. Turn release, decay, and attack to 0. Use the sustain knob to 
> manually modulate the pitch.
> 
> Lastly, a few modules have already been suggested; the A-137 and A-
> 188. Those modules are good to have, yes, but I don't think they move 
> your synth in the immediate direction you want to go, and that is fat 
> and hard sounds. What I suggest is an oakley overdrive to help your 
> filters scream: http://www.oakleysound.co.uk/overdrv.htm You need to 
> ask the oakley guy if he can make you a eurorack overdrive. It may 
> take a little more than a month for you to get it. I ordered my own 
> just yesterday.
> 
> I would suggest a saw animator to create supersaw sounds, but it looks 
> like there's none available. E-mail Cynthia about it:
http://www.cyndustries.com/modules_sawtooth.cfm
>

Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-23 by techmaster242

Wow, thanks for that!  I've been wanting to hear a demo of that thing
for quite some time, and I honestly have to say, I'm absolutely
convinced that is what my modular needs.  Maybe I was wrong when I
said my modular isn't "fat" enough, it definitely needs that bottom
end growl, and hearing what it did to that voice and sine wave is
definitely impressive.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999
<heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote:
>
> I would not expect too much from the A115 if I were you...
> I made some exaples of the A115.
> 
> http://ernstvanderloo.com/Doepfer/A115-speech.mp3
> 
> Is some speech from an audio book through the A115.
> I'm having the original signal at 100% al the time.
> Slowly adding one octave below, taking it out, slowly taking in 2
octaves
> below etc.
> At the end you hear a mixture of all the signals at the same time.
> 
> http://ernstvanderloo.com/Doepfer/A115-sine.mp3
> 
> Is a sinetone from the A143-9 as input. I'm doing the same as in the
other
> mp3.
> Why the A143-9 for this example? Because it's the cleanest sine tone a
> Doepfer module can generate.
> 
> These example are very dull and academic but I guess it shows you
what the
> A115 can do.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Ernst
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:24 AM, techmaster242 <techmaster@...> wrote:
> 
> >   The A-102 and A-124 sound amazing. Equally as aggressive as the
> > Polivoks, and less than half the price. I'm 100% positive my problem
> > doesn't lie in the filters. It's what I'm putting into them.
> >
> > Everybody is saying to get an A-137, but I already have one. LOL I'm
> > kind of confused though, because if you fold a saw wave, you basically
> > get a ramp wave, but with lower amperage. If you fold a square wave,
> > you get a square wave, once again with lower amperage. You basically
> > can't fold any wave with vertical elements, so you're stuck with
> > folding triangle and sine waves, and neither one sounds very
> > spectacular to me. Honestly, I bought the A-137 to be a drum effects
> > unit, and it is no slouch in that department. I absolutely love it
> > for effecting drums.
> >
> > When you all say to sync the VCO's, what do I sync them to? Do I
> > split the gate and sync them both to that? Or run, say, VCO1's square
> > into VCA2's sync input? I've already played with syncing the LFO to a
> > VCO, and that fattens things up a bit, I just want more. :) If I
> > tune both VCO's the same, and set their octave switches one octave
> > apart, it sounds a bit thicker, since the sound covered two octaves
> > instead of one, so I'm thinking the A-115 will give me the same
> > benefit, freeing up the second VCO to simply reinforce what the first
> > VCO is playing.
> >
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "argitoth" <argitoth@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I think you need to step back and really think about what kind of
> > > sound you're trying to create with your synth. What you seem to lack
> > > may be physical (not the right module) and it may also be mental
(your
> > > understanding of how to create X sound).
> > >
> > > First thing I noticed is that you don't have a VC ADSR. However, you
> > > can get similar effects by combining two ADSRs into the same input.
> > > You can get really snappy envelopes that way. You can also get a
> > > snappy sound by sending one envelope to modulate the pitch of an osc
> > > and the other to modulate the filter. Another thing about ADSRs is
> > > that you should make use of the sustain and release to create nice
> > > envelope shapes.
> > >
> > > I think if your $2000 synth doesn't sound like $2000 it could be
your
> > > quality of filters. I would love to hear the A-102 and A-124. I know
> > > the Polivoks it good... well that's what everyone says.
> > >
> > > Second thing is that you should understand how to make your synth
> > > scream. Bandpass and notch is where it's at! I used to think lowpass
> > > filters make synths scream. I was wrong! Create feedback patches by
> > > multiplying a filter's output to go into itself with a saw wave and
> > > out to your speaker, use notch or bandpass. Now invert the signal
> > > going back into the filter... it's really confusing IMO. But it
> > > doesn't look like any of your modules can invert a signal.
> > >
> > > Here's how the Model 12 sounds with inverted feedback:
> > > http://www.elanhickler.com/misc/model_12_scream2.mp3
> > >
> > > Another thing is that you don't have any real way to create the
> > > classic screamy sync sound. Actually, you can use an envelope. Patch
> > > it into the pitch control instead of patching your CV1 from your
midi
> > > module. Turn release, decay, and attack to 0. Use the sustain
knob to
> > > manually modulate the pitch.
> > >
> > > Lastly, a few modules have already been suggested; the A-137 and A-
> > > 188. Those modules are good to have, yes, but I don't think they
move
> > > your synth in the immediate direction you want to go, and that
is fat
> > > and hard sounds. What I suggest is an oakley overdrive to help your
> > > filters scream: http://www.oakleysound.co.uk/overdrv.htm You need to
> > > ask the oakley guy if he can make you a eurorack overdrive. It may
> > > take a little more than a month for you to get it. I ordered my own
> > > just yesterday.
> > >
> > > I would suggest a saw animator to create supersaw sounds, but it
looks
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > > like there's none available. E-mail Cynthia about it:
> > http://www.cyndustries.com/modules_sawtooth.cfm
> > >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Mark Pulver

Oh wow.. That's embarrassing...

:)

-----
techmaster242 (05:24 PM 10/23/2008) wrote:
 >Everybody is saying to get an A-137, but I already have one.  LOL

techmaster242 (08:17 AM 10/23/2008) wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  >Here is my modular as of now:
  >
  >A110 - VCO
  >...
  >A137 - Wave Multiplier

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by achtung_999

I would not expect too much from the A115 if I were you...
I made some exaples of the A115.

http://ernstvanderloo.com/Doepfer/A115-speech.mp3

Is some speech from an audio book through the A115.
I'm having the original signal at 100% al the time.
Slowly adding one octave below, taking it out, slowly taking in 2 octaves
below etc.
At the end you hear a mixture of all the signals at the same time.

http://ernstvanderloo.com/Doepfer/A115-sine.mp3

Is a sinetone from the A143-9 as input. I'm doing the same as in the other
mp3.
Why the A143-9 for this example? Because it's the cleanest sine tone a
Doepfer module can generate.

These example are very dull and academic but I guess it shows you what the
A115 can do.

Greetings,

Ernst




On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:24 AM, techmaster242 <techmaster@gmail.com> wrote:

>   The A-102 and A-124 sound amazing. Equally as aggressive as the
> Polivoks, and less than half the price. I'm 100% positive my problem
> doesn't lie in the filters. It's what I'm putting into them.
>
> Everybody is saying to get an A-137, but I already have one. LOL I'm
> kind of confused though, because if you fold a saw wave, you basically
> get a ramp wave, but with lower amperage. If you fold a square wave,
> you get a square wave, once again with lower amperage. You basically
> can't fold any wave with vertical elements, so you're stuck with
> folding triangle and sine waves, and neither one sounds very
> spectacular to me. Honestly, I bought the A-137 to be a drum effects
> unit, and it is no slouch in that department. I absolutely love it
> for effecting drums.
>
> When you all say to sync the VCO's, what do I sync them to? Do I
> split the gate and sync them both to that? Or run, say, VCO1's square
> into VCA2's sync input? I've already played with syncing the LFO to a
> VCO, and that fattens things up a bit, I just want more. :) If I
> tune both VCO's the same, and set their octave switches one octave
> apart, it sounds a bit thicker, since the sound covered two octaves
> instead of one, so I'm thinking the A-115 will give me the same
> benefit, freeing up the second VCO to simply reinforce what the first
> VCO is playing.
>
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "argitoth" <argitoth@...> wrote:
> >
> > I think you need to step back and really think about what kind of
> > sound you're trying to create with your synth. What you seem to lack
> > may be physical (not the right module) and it may also be mental (your
> > understanding of how to create X sound).
> >
> > First thing I noticed is that you don't have a VC ADSR. However, you
> > can get similar effects by combining two ADSRs into the same input.
> > You can get really snappy envelopes that way. You can also get a
> > snappy sound by sending one envelope to modulate the pitch of an osc
> > and the other to modulate the filter. Another thing about ADSRs is
> > that you should make use of the sustain and release to create nice
> > envelope shapes.
> >
> > I think if your $2000 synth doesn't sound like $2000 it could be your
> > quality of filters. I would love to hear the A-102 and A-124. I know
> > the Polivoks it good... well that's what everyone says.
> >
> > Second thing is that you should understand how to make your synth
> > scream. Bandpass and notch is where it's at! I used to think lowpass
> > filters make synths scream. I was wrong! Create feedback patches by
> > multiplying a filter's output to go into itself with a saw wave and
> > out to your speaker, use notch or bandpass. Now invert the signal
> > going back into the filter... it's really confusing IMO. But it
> > doesn't look like any of your modules can invert a signal.
> >
> > Here's how the Model 12 sounds with inverted feedback:
> > http://www.elanhickler.com/misc/model_12_scream2.mp3
> >
> > Another thing is that you don't have any real way to create the
> > classic screamy sync sound. Actually, you can use an envelope. Patch
> > it into the pitch control instead of patching your CV1 from your midi
> > module. Turn release, decay, and attack to 0. Use the sustain knob to
> > manually modulate the pitch.
> >
> > Lastly, a few modules have already been suggested; the A-137 and A-
> > 188. Those modules are good to have, yes, but I don't think they move
> > your synth in the immediate direction you want to go, and that is fat
> > and hard sounds. What I suggest is an oakley overdrive to help your
> > filters scream: http://www.oakleysound.co.uk/overdrv.htm You need to
> > ask the oakley guy if he can make you a eurorack overdrive. It may
> > take a little more than a month for you to get it. I ordered my own
> > just yesterday.
> >
> > I would suggest a saw animator to create supersaw sounds, but it looks
> > like there's none available. E-mail Cynthia about it:
> http://www.cyndustries.com/modules_sawtooth.cfm
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by madrayken

http://www.denecarter.com/Beast.jpg
http://www.denecarter.com/Beast.mp3

Have a listen - my setup's not entirely different from yours, and any 
low down grunt from mine simply comes from having a good, solid low 
octave VCO in the mix, and doubling up wherever possible, plus a side 
helping of sync (which I love).

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "techmaster242" <techmaster@...> 
wrote:
>
> Wow, thanks for that!  I've been wanting to hear a demo of that 
thing
> for quite some time, and I honestly have to say, I'm absolutely
> convinced that is what my modular needs.  Maybe I was wrong when I
> said my modular isn't "fat" enough, it definitely needs that bottom
> end growl, and hearing what it did to that voice and sine wave is
> definitely impressive.
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999
> <heinrich.himmelwasser@> wrote:
> >
> > I would not expect too much from the A115 if I were you...
> > I made some exaples of the A115.
> > 
> > http://ernstvanderloo.com/Doepfer/A115-speech.mp3
> > 
> > Is some speech from an audio book through the A115.
> > I'm having the original signal at 100% al the time.
> > Slowly adding one octave below, taking it out, slowly taking in 2
> octaves
> > below etc.
> > At the end you hear a mixture of all the signals at the same time.
> > 
> > http://ernstvanderloo.com/Doepfer/A115-sine.mp3
> > 
> > Is a sinetone from the A143-9 as input. I'm doing the same as in 
the
> other
> > mp3.
> > Why the A143-9 for this example? Because it's the cleanest sine 
tone a
> > Doepfer module can generate.
> > 
> > These example are very dull and academic but I guess it shows you
> what the
> > A115 can do.
> > 
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > Ernst
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:24 AM, techmaster242 <techmaster@> 
wrote:
> > 
> > >   The A-102 and A-124 sound amazing. Equally as aggressive as 
the
> > > Polivoks, and less than half the price. I'm 100% positive my 
problem
> > > doesn't lie in the filters. It's what I'm putting into them.
> > >
> > > Everybody is saying to get an A-137, but I already have one. 
LOL I'm
> > > kind of confused though, because if you fold a saw wave, you 
basically
> > > get a ramp wave, but with lower amperage. If you fold a square 
wave,
> > > you get a square wave, once again with lower amperage. You 
basically
> > > can't fold any wave with vertical elements, so you're stuck with
> > > folding triangle and sine waves, and neither one sounds very
> > > spectacular to me. Honestly, I bought the A-137 to be a drum 
effects
> > > unit, and it is no slouch in that department. I absolutely love 
it
> > > for effecting drums.
> > >
> > > When you all say to sync the VCO's, what do I sync them to? Do I
> > > split the gate and sync them both to that? Or run, say, VCO1's 
square
> > > into VCA2's sync input? I've already played with syncing the 
LFO to a
> > > VCO, and that fattens things up a bit, I just want more. :) If I
> > > tune both VCO's the same, and set their octave switches one 
octave
> > > apart, it sounds a bit thicker, since the sound covered two 
octaves
> > > instead of one, so I'm thinking the A-115 will give me the same
> > > benefit, freeing up the second VCO to simply reinforce what the 
first
> > > VCO is playing.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%
40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > "argitoth" <argitoth@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think you need to step back and really think about what 
kind of
> > > > sound you're trying to create with your synth. What you seem 
to lack
> > > > may be physical (not the right module) and it may also be 
mental
> (your
> > > > understanding of how to create X sound).
> > > >
> > > > First thing I noticed is that you don't have a VC ADSR. 
However, you
> > > > can get similar effects by combining two ADSRs into the same 
input.
> > > > You can get really snappy envelopes that way. You can also 
get a
> > > > snappy sound by sending one envelope to modulate the pitch of 
an osc
> > > > and the other to modulate the filter. Another thing about 
ADSRs is
> > > > that you should make use of the sustain and release to create 
nice
> > > > envelope shapes.
> > > >
> > > > I think if your $2000 synth doesn't sound like $2000 it could 
be
> your
> > > > quality of filters. I would love to hear the A-102 and A-124. 
I know
> > > > the Polivoks it good... well that's what everyone says.
> > > >
> > > > Second thing is that you should understand how to make your 
synth
> > > > scream. Bandpass and notch is where it's at! I used to think 
lowpass
> > > > filters make synths scream. I was wrong! Create feedback 
patches by
> > > > multiplying a filter's output to go into itself with a saw 
wave and
> > > > out to your speaker, use notch or bandpass. Now invert the 
signal
> > > > going back into the filter... it's really confusing IMO. But 
it
> > > > doesn't look like any of your modules can invert a signal.
> > > >
> > > > Here's how the Model 12 sounds with inverted feedback:
> > > > http://www.elanhickler.com/misc/model_12_scream2.mp3
> > > >
> > > > Another thing is that you don't have any real way to create 
the
> > > > classic screamy sync sound. Actually, you can use an 
envelope. Patch
> > > > it into the pitch control instead of patching your CV1 from 
your
> midi
> > > > module. Turn release, decay, and attack to 0. Use the sustain
> knob to
> > > > manually modulate the pitch.
> > > >
> > > > Lastly, a few modules have already been suggested; the A-137 
and A-
> > > > 188. Those modules are good to have, yes, but I don't think 
they
> move
> > > > your synth in the immediate direction you want to go, and that
> is fat
> > > > and hard sounds. What I suggest is an oakley overdrive to 
help your
> > > > filters scream: http://www.oakleysound.co.uk/overdrv.htm You 
need to
> > > > ask the oakley guy if he can make you a eurorack overdrive. 
It may
> > > > take a little more than a month for you to get it. I ordered 
my own
> > > > just yesterday.
> > > >
> > > > I would suggest a saw animator to create supersaw sounds, but 
it
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> looks
> > > > like there's none available. E-mail Cynthia about it:
> > > http://www.cyndustries.com/modules_sawtooth.cfm
> > > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

RE: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Anthony Rolando

If you have not already got the sounds you like, try a ring mod and/ or the Malgorithm.

On the ring-mod tip I (of course) recommend the modDemod. 
In addition to ring mod effects it does a wickedly crunchy octave up, and sounds wonderfully ominous on human voice.

To do octave up just mult a signal into both the program and carrier blend the output with the original signal using a mixer. If you start with a lower octave sine or triangle you will get great results as the octave up coming from the modDemod is clipped and will ride aggressively on top of the lower octave triangle.

TOny



> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> From: techmaster@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:17:25 +0000
> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?
> 
> Here is my modular as of now:
> 
> A110 - VCO
> A110 - VCO
> A145 - LFO1
> A146 - LFO2
> A138b - Log Mixer
> A140 - ADSR
> A140 - ADSR
> A131 - Exp. VCA
> A180 - Multiples
> A180 - Multiples
> A190 - MIDI Interface
> A102 - Diode LPF
> A124 - WASP Filter
> A137 - Wave Multiplier
> Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF
> 
> This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
> Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.
> 
> Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot.  It's
> definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
> else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful.  So far, this
> thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest.  It does not sound
> like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I
> know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
> key element to fatten it up.  Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
> the A-115 divider/suboscillator module.  But is that it?  If it helps,
> I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal.  Is
> the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
> "WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as
> well?
> 
> Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
> "typically" patch that in?  Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
> then sub-oscillate the mixed signal?  Or do you just sub-oscillate one
> oscillator, pre-mixer?
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
You live life beyond your PC. So now Windows goes beyond your PC.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298556/direct/01/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Chris Jones

Yeah, I'm seriously eyeing the Malgorithm.  The idea of being to
modulate the sampling frequency really sounds like a lot of fun.  So
you're saying you can ring-mod a signal with itself and you'll
basically get a higher frequency version of itself?

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Anthony Rolando
<goldenechos@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you have not already got the sounds you like, try a ring mod and/ or the
> Malgorithm.
>
> On the ring-mod tip I (of course) recommend the modDemod.
> In addition to ring mod effects it does a wickedly crunchy octave up, and
> sounds wonderfully ominous on human voice.
>
> To do octave up just mult a signal into both the program and carrier blend
> the output with the original signal using a mixer. If you start with a lower
> octave sine or triangle you will get great results as the octave up coming
> from the modDemod is clipped and will ride aggressively on top of the lower
> octave triangle.
>
> TOny
>
>> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>> From: techmaster@gmail.com
>> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:17:25 +0000
>> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?
>>
>> Here is my modular as of now:
>>
>> A110 - VCO
>> A110 - VCO
>> A145 - LFO1
>> A146 - LFO2
>> A138b - Log Mixer
>> A140 - ADSR
>> A140 - ADSR
>> A131 - Exp. VCA
>> A180 - Multiples
>> A180 - Multiples
>> A190 - MIDI Interface
>> A102 - Diode LPF
>> A124 - WASP Filter
>> A137 - Wave Multiplier
>> Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF
>>
>> This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
>> Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.
>>
>> Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot. It's
>> definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
>> else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful. So far, this
>> thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest. It does not sound
>> like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I
>> know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
>> key element to fatten it up. Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
>> the A-115 divider/suboscillator module. But is that it? If it helps,
>> I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal. Is
>> the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
>> "WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as
>> well?
>>
>> Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
>> "typically" patch that in? Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
>> then sub-oscillate the mixed signal? Or do you just sub-oscillate one
>> oscillator, pre-mixer?
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> You live life beyond your PC. So now Windows goes beyond your PC.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298556/direct/01/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 



-- 
Chris Jones
http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com

Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by jalmari3

Only one VCA and one mixer?

Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual linear/exponential VCA and A-138c 
Polarizing Mixer.

RE: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Anthony Rolando

> 
> Yeah, I'm seriously eyeing the Malgorithm.  The idea of being to
> modulate the sampling frequency really sounds like a lot of fun.  So
> you're saying you can ring-mod a signal with itself and you'll
> basically get a higher frequency version of itself?

Exactly. If the ringmod is a "clean" circuit the sound will be true to the original. The modDemod is not a clean circuit, and so the octave up is "crunchy."

Additionally, you may get aggressie sounds by tuning 2 VCO to intervals and using one as program and the other as carrier, applied to a ringmod or balanced modulator as some like to call them.

TOny

> 
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Anthony Rolando
> <goldenechos@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If you have not already got the sounds you like, try a ring mod and/ or the
> > Malgorithm.
> >
> > On the ring-mod tip I (of course) recommend the modDemod.
> > In addition to ring mod effects it does a wickedly crunchy octave up, and
> > sounds wonderfully ominous on human voice.
> >
> > To do octave up just mult a signal into both the program and carrier blend
> > the output with the original signal using a mixer. If you start with a lower
> > octave sine or triangle you will get great results as the octave up coming
> > from the modDemod is clipped and will ride aggressively on top of the lower
> > octave triangle.
> >
> > TOny
> >
> >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >> From: techmaster@gmail.com
> >> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:17:25 +0000
> >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?
> >>
> >> Here is my modular as of now:
> >>
> >> A110 - VCO
> >> A110 - VCO
> >> A145 - LFO1
> >> A146 - LFO2
> >> A138b - Log Mixer
> >> A140 - ADSR
> >> A140 - ADSR
> >> A131 - Exp. VCA
> >> A180 - Multiples
> >> A180 - Multiples
> >> A190 - MIDI Interface
> >> A102 - Diode LPF
> >> A124 - WASP Filter
> >> A137 - Wave Multiplier
> >> Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF
> >>
> >> This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
> >> Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.
> >>
> >> Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot. It's
> >> definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
> >> else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful. So far, this
> >> thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest. It does not sound
> >> like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I
> >> know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
> >> key element to fatten it up. Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
> >> the A-115 divider/suboscillator module. But is that it? If it helps,
> >> I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal. Is
> >> the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
> >> "WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as
> >> well?
> >>
> >> Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
> >> "typically" patch that in? Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
> >> then sub-oscillate the mixed signal? Or do you just sub-oscillate one
> >> oscillator, pre-mixer?
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > You live life beyond your PC. So now Windows goes beyond your PC.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298556/direct/01/
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chris Jones
> http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
When your life is on the go�take your life with you.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Chris Henkel

2008/10/24 Anthony Rolando <goldenechos@hotmail.com>

>   >On the ring-mod tip I (of course) recommend the modDemod.
>



...hmmm...I'd recommend the Ken Stone RRM (RealRingModulator) - take two,
and take one of the cheap 8-hole frontpanels available from Doepfer, and
voila, within minimum effort you get a great sounding RingMod...

(sorry Dieter, I also have the A114 in my setup, but while it is a good
module, the RRM sounds better (full, fat) for my purposes - y.m.m.v.)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Anthony Rolando

Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of that waveshaper you will find that you will be able to get more out of it...



Additionally, I wanted to mention the Doepfer A-124 Wasp style filter.
This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit deranged. It is inexpensive, has multiple outs.



Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used as a signal processor this one gets real nasty. Perhaps too much so!



TOny

> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25 +0000
> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
> 
> Only one VCA and one mixer?
> 
> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual linear/exponential VCA and A-138c 
> Polarizing Mixer.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
When your life is on the go�take your life with you.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Argitoth

what the heck does the A-196 PLL do? Can't bother reading all that crap,
better to just have some sound demos and a simple explanation.

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Anthony Rolando <goldenechos@hotmail.com>wrote:

>
> Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of that waveshaper you will find that
> you will be able to get more out of it...
>
>
>
> Additionally, I wanted to mention the Doepfer A-124 Wasp style filter.
> This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit deranged. It is inexpensive, has
> multiple outs.
>
>
>
> Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used as a signal processor this one gets
> real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
>
>
>
> TOny
>
> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi
> > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25 +0000
> > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
> >
> > Only one VCA and one mixer?
> >
> > Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
> > Polarizing Mixer.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> When your life is on the go�take your life with you.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
www.elanhickler.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Robert Voso

Audio demos ate nice, no question  Also, reading "all that crap" will  
not only give you a true understanding of the mechanics of the module,  
but also broaden you knowledge of synthesis in general.

Sent from my iPhone
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com> wrote:

> what the heck does the A-196 PLL do? Can't bother reading all that  
> crap,
> better to just have some sound demos and a simple explanation.
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Anthony Rolando <goldenechos@hotmail.com 
> >wrote:
>
>>
>> Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of that waveshaper you will  
>> find that
>> you will be able to get more out of it...
>>
>>
>>
>> Additionally, I wanted to mention the Doepfer A-124 Wasp style  
>> filter.
>> This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit deranged. It is  
>> inexpensive, has
>> multiple outs.
>>
>>
>>
>> Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used as a signal processor this  
>> one gets
>> real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
>>
>>
>>
>> TOny
>>
>>> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>>> From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi
>>> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25 +0000
>>> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
>>>
>>> Only one VCA and one mixer?
>>>
>>> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
>>> Polarizing Mixer.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> When your life is on the go—take your life with you.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> www.elanhickler.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Argitoth

I knew you'd say that... well what do you knowthere are a few audio demos...
now im interested in reading all that crap.

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Robert Voso <mailinglist@burstgenerator.com
> wrote:

>   Audio demos ate nice, no question Also, reading "all that crap" will
> not only give you a true understanding of the mechanics of the module,
> but also broaden you knowledge of synthesis in general.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com<argitoth%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > what the heck does the A-196 PLL do? Can't bother reading all that
> > crap,
> > better to just have some sound demos and a simple explanation.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Anthony Rolando <
> goldenechos@hotmail.com <goldenechos%40hotmail.com>
> > >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of that waveshaper you will
> >> find that
> >> you will be able to get more out of it...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Additionally, I wanted to mention the Doepfer A-124 Wasp style
> >> filter.
> >> This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit deranged. It is
> >> inexpensive, has
> >> multiple outs.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used as a signal processor this
> >> one gets
> >> real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> TOny
> >>
> >>> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> >>> From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi <jari.jokinen%40netikka.fi>
> >>> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25 +0000
> >>> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
> >>>
> >>> Only one VCA and one mixer?
> >>>
> >>> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
> >>> Polarizing Mixer.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________________
> >> When your life is on the go�take your life with you.
> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.elanhickler.com
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>  
>



-- 
www.elanhickler.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by achtung_999

"all that crap"
Come on.. If you act like that you should not ask questions here in the
group.
RTFM!


On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Robert Voso <
mailinglist@burstgenerator.com> wrote:

>   Audio demos ate nice, no question Also, reading "all that crap" will
> not only give you a true understanding of the mechanics of the module,
> but also broaden you knowledge of synthesis in general.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com<argitoth%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > what the heck does the A-196 PLL do? Can't bother reading all that
> > crap,
> > better to just have some sound demos and a simple explanation.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Anthony Rolando <
> goldenechos@hotmail.com <goldenechos%40hotmail.com>
> > >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of that waveshaper you will
> >> find that
> >> you will be able to get more out of it...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Additionally, I wanted to mention the Doepfer A-124 Wasp style
> >> filter.
> >> This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit deranged. It is
> >> inexpensive, has
> >> multiple outs.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used as a signal processor this
> >> one gets
> >> real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> TOny
> >>
> >>> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> >>> From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi <jari.jokinen%40netikka.fi>
> >>> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25 +0000
> >>> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
> >>>
> >>> Only one VCA and one mixer?
> >>>
> >>> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
> >>> Polarizing Mixer.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________________
> >> When your life is on the go�take your life with you.
> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.elanhickler.com
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Chris Jones

I already have the wasp and love it.  :)  I can't decide if I like
that or the Polivoks more, which is nuts considering the Polivoks was
like 3x as much money.

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Anthony Rolando
<goldenechos@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of that waveshaper you will find that you will be able to get more out of it...
>
>
>
> Additionally, I wanted to mention the Doepfer A-124 Wasp style filter.
> This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit deranged. It is inexpensive, has multiple outs.
>
>
>
> Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used as a signal processor this one gets real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
>
>
>
> TOny
>
>> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>> From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi
>> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25 +0000
>> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
>>
>> Only one VCA and one mixer?
>>
>> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
>> Polarizing Mixer.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> When your life is on the go—take your life with you.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>



-- 
Chris Jones
http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Argitoth

So what module would be best for adding harmonics or getting some kind of FM
sounds? Is it the PLL or the Wave Multiplier or neither?

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Chris Jones <techmaster@gmail.com> wrote:

> I already have the wasp and love it.  :)  I can't decide if I like
> that or the Polivoks more, which is nuts considering the Polivoks was
> like 3x as much money.
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Anthony Rolando
> <goldenechos@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of that waveshaper you will find
> that you will be able to get more out of it...
> >
> >
> >
> > Additionally, I wanted to mention the Doepfer A-124 Wasp style filter.
> > This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit deranged. It is inexpensive, has
> multiple outs.
> >
> >
> >
> > Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used as a signal processor this one
> gets real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
> >
> >
> >
> > TOny
> >
> >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >> From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi
> >> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25 +0000
> >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
> >>
> >> Only one VCA and one mixer?
> >>
> >> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
> >> Polarizing Mixer.
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > When your life is on the go�take your life with you.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Jones
> http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
www.elanhickler.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-24 by Chris Jones

I know one thing that drives me nuts, is when I use an LFO for
modulation...it'll sound great when playing one note, but as soon as
you shift to another note, the LFO is no longer in harmony and it
sounds terrible.  I personally feel that LFO's are terrible for
modulation, and lately I've been learning that running your oscillator
into a multiple and using the split oscillations to modulate various
things, can sound way better, since it's always in tune/harmony.

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com> wrote:
> So what module would be best for adding harmonics or getting some kind of FM
> sounds? Is it the PLL or the Wave Multiplier or neither?
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Chris Jones <techmaster@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I already have the wasp and love it.  :)  I can't decide if I like
>> that or the Polivoks more, which is nuts considering the Polivoks was
>> like 3x as much money.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Anthony Rolando
>> <goldenechos@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of that waveshaper you will find
>> that you will be able to get more out of it...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Additionally, I wanted to mention the Doepfer A-124 Wasp style filter.
>> > This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit deranged. It is inexpensive, has
>> multiple outs.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used as a signal processor this one
>> gets real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > TOny
>> >
>> >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>> >> From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi
>> >> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25 +0000
>> >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
>> >>
>> >> Only one VCA and one mixer?
>> >>
>> >> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
>> >> Polarizing Mixer.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _________________________________________________________________
>> > When your life is on the go—take your life with you.
>> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Jones
>> http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> www.elanhickler.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>



-- 
Chris Jones
http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-25 by Argitoth

You can definitely create new harmonics syncing VCOs and routing them all
crazy places, but I just can't seem to get a FM-type sound... like I have to
use a filter to reduce harmonics instead of reducing a modulation.

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Chris Jones <techmaster@gmail.com> wrote:

> I know one thing that drives me nuts, is when I use an LFO for
> modulation...it'll sound great when playing one note, but as soon as
> you shift to another note, the LFO is no longer in harmony and it
> sounds terrible.  I personally feel that LFO's are terrible for
> modulation, and lately I've been learning that running your oscillator
> into a multiple and using the split oscillations to modulate various
> things, can sound way better, since it's always in tune/harmony.
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So what module would be best for adding harmonics or getting some kind of
> FM
> > sounds? Is it the PLL or the Wave Multiplier or neither?
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Chris Jones <techmaster@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I already have the wasp and love it.  :)  I can't decide if I like
> >> that or the Polivoks more, which is nuts considering the Polivoks was
> >> like 3x as much money.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Anthony Rolando
> >> <goldenechos@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of that waveshaper you will find
> >> that you will be able to get more out of it...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Additionally, I wanted to mention the Doepfer A-124 Wasp style filter.
> >> > This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit deranged. It is inexpensive,
> has
> >> multiple outs.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used as a signal processor this one
> >> gets real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > TOny
> >> >
> >> >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >> >> From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi
> >> >> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25 +0000
> >> >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
> >> >>
> >> >> Only one VCA and one mixer?
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
> >> >> Polarizing Mixer.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ------------------------------------
> >> >>
> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > _________________________________________________________________
> >> > When your life is on the go�take your life with you.
> >> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/
> >> >
> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Chris Jones
> >> http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.elanhickler.com
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Jones
> http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
www.elanhickler.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-25 by Bakis Sirros

that is, probably, because your vco's do not have linear fm, am i right?
for fm-type sounds (fm'ed sounds that retain their fundamental pitch, you need linear fm and not exponential fm).
after that, of course you have to attenuate the fm amount (fm index), otherwise you'll get too many extra, upper and lower, sinewaves (harmonics).

and no need to say that you have to strat with rather 'pure' sounds (sinewaves or triangles).


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece


--- On Sat, 10/25/08, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, October 25, 2008, 3:24 AM
> You can definitely create new harmonics syncing VCOs and
> routing them all
> crazy places, but I just can't seem to get a FM-type
> sound... like I have to
> use a filter to reduce harmonics instead of reducing a
> modulation.
> 
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Chris Jones
> <techmaster@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I know one thing that drives me nuts, is when I use an
> LFO for
> > modulation...it'll sound great when playing one
> note, but as soon as
> > you shift to another note, the LFO is no longer in
> harmony and it
> > sounds terrible.  I personally feel that LFO's are
> terrible for
> > modulation, and lately I've been learning that
> running your oscillator
> > into a multiple and using the split oscillations to
> modulate various
> > things, can sound way better, since it's always in
> tune/harmony.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Argitoth
> <argitoth@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > So what module would be best for adding harmonics
> or getting some kind of
> > FM
> > > sounds? Is it the PLL or the Wave Multiplier or
> neither?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Chris Jones
> <techmaster@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I already have the wasp and love it.  :)  I
> can't decide if I like
> > >> that or the Polivoks more, which is nuts
> considering the Polivoks was
> > >> like 3x as much money.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Anthony
> Rolando
> > >> <goldenechos@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of
> that waveshaper you will find
> > >> that you will be able to get more out of
> it...
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Additionally, I wanted to mention the
> Doepfer A-124 Wasp style filter.
> > >> > This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit
> deranged. It is inexpensive,
> > has
> > >> multiple outs.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used
> as a signal processor this one
> > >> gets real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > TOny
> > >> >
> > >> >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > >> >> From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi
> > >> >> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25
> +0000
> > >> >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am
> I missing?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Only one VCA and one mixer?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual
> linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
> > >> >> Polarizing Mixer.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ------------------------------------
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > >> > When your life is on the go葉ake your
> life with you.
> > >> >
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/
> > >> >
> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have
> been removed]
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Chris Jones
> > >> http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > www.elanhickler.com
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chris Jones
> > http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> www.elanhickler.com
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-25 by Argitoth

The modulator and carrier have to stay exactly in tune with each other,
that's the problem.

On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com>wrote:

>   that is, probably, because your vco's do not have linear fm, am i right?
> for fm-type sounds (fm'ed sounds that retain their fundamental pitch, you
> need linear fm and not exponential fm).
> after that, of course you have to attenuate the fm amount (fm index),
> otherwise you'll get too many extra, upper and lower, sinewaves (harmonics).
>
> and no need to say that you have to strat with rather 'pure' sounds
> (sinewaves or triangles).
>
>
> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner
> www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> www. DiN. org. uk
> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
> www. shimarecords. co. uk
> www. rubberrecords. gr
> Athens - Greece
>
> --- On Sat, 10/25/08, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com <argitoth%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com <argitoth%40gmail.com>>
> > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Saturday, October 25, 2008, 3:24 AM
>
> > You can definitely create new harmonics syncing VCOs and
> > routing them all
> > crazy places, but I just can't seem to get a FM-type
> > sound... like I have to
> > use a filter to reduce harmonics instead of reducing a
> > modulation.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Chris Jones
> > <techmaster@gmail.com <techmaster%40gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > > I know one thing that drives me nuts, is when I use an
> > LFO for
> > > modulation...it'll sound great when playing one
> > note, but as soon as
> > > you shift to another note, the LFO is no longer in
> > harmony and it
> > > sounds terrible. I personally feel that LFO's are
> > terrible for
> > > modulation, and lately I've been learning that
> > running your oscillator
> > > into a multiple and using the split oscillations to
> > modulate various
> > > things, can sound way better, since it's always in
> > tune/harmony.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Argitoth
> > <argitoth@gmail.com <argitoth%40gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > So what module would be best for adding harmonics
> > or getting some kind of
> > > FM
> > > > sounds? Is it the PLL or the Wave Multiplier or
> > neither?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Chris Jones
> > <techmaster@gmail.com <techmaster%40gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I already have the wasp and love it. :) I
> > can't decide if I like
> > > >> that or the Polivoks more, which is nuts
> > considering the Polivoks was
> > > >> like 3x as much money.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Anthony
> > Rolando
> > > >> <goldenechos@hotmail.com <goldenechos%40hotmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of
> > that waveshaper you will find
> > > >> that you will be able to get more out of
> > it...
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Additionally, I wanted to mention the
> > Doepfer A-124 Wasp style filter.
> > > >> > This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit
> > deranged. It is inexpensive,
> > > has
> > > >> multiple outs.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used
> > as a signal processor this one
> > > >> gets real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > TOny
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com<Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > >> >> From: jari.jokinen@netikka.fi <jari.jokinen%40netikka.fi>
> > > >> >> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25
> > +0000
> > > >> >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am
> > I missing?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Only one VCA and one mixer?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual
> > linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
> > > >> >> Polarizing Mixer.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> ------------------------------------
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > > >> > When your life is on the go葉ake your
> > life with you.
> > > >> >
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have
> > been removed]
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ------------------------------------
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Chris Jones
> > > >> http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com
> > > >>
> > > >> ------------------------------------
> > > >>
> > > >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > www.elanhickler.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Chris Jones
> > > http://www.doomsdaytechnologies.com
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.elanhickler.com
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>  
>



-- 
www.elanhickler.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-25 by Bakis Sirros

no, the modulator and carrier do not have to be 'in tune', unless you only want a specific range of linear fm sounds.
in linear fm, the modulator and carrier can still not be in tune and yet produce musical sounds.

Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece

--- On Sat, 10/25/08, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, October 25, 2008, 1:41 PM






The modulator and carrier have to stay exactly in tune with each other,
that's the problem.

On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_ 2000@yahoo. com>wrote:

> that is, probably, because your vco's do not have linear fm, am i right?
> for fm-type sounds (fm'ed sounds that retain their fundamental pitch, you
> need linear fm and not exponential fm).
> after that, of course you have to attenuate the fm amount (fm index),
> otherwise you'll get too many extra, upper and lower, sinewaves (harmonics).
>
> and no need to say that you have to strat with rather 'pure' sounds
> (sinewaves or triangles).
>
>
> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner
> www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> www. DiN. org. uk
> www. musicamaximamagneti ca. com
> www. shimarecords. co. uk
> www. rubberrecords. gr
> Athens - Greece
>
> --- On Sat, 10/25/08, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail. com <argitoth%40gmail. com>>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Argitoth <argitoth@gmail. com <argitoth%40gmail. com>>
> > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
> > To: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com <Doepfer_a100% 40yahoogroups. com>
> > Date: Saturday, October 25, 2008, 3:24 AM
>
> > You can definitely create new harmonics syncing VCOs and
> > routing them all
> > crazy places, but I just can't seem to get a FM-type
> > sound... like I have to
> > use a filter to reduce harmonics instead of reducing a
> > modulation.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Chris Jones
> > <techmaster@gmail. com <techmaster% 40gmail.com> > wrote:
> >
> > > I know one thing that drives me nuts, is when I use an
> > LFO for
> > > modulation.. .it'll sound great when playing one
> > note, but as soon as
> > > you shift to another note, the LFO is no longer in
> > harmony and it
> > > sounds terrible. I personally feel that LFO's are
> > terrible for
> > > modulation, and lately I've been learning that
> > running your oscillator
> > > into a multiple and using the split oscillations to
> > modulate various
> > > things, can sound way better, since it's always in
> > tune/harmony.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Argitoth
> > <argitoth@gmail. com <argitoth%40gmail. com>> wrote:
> > > > So what module would be best for adding harmonics
> > or getting some kind of
> > > FM
> > > > sounds? Is it the PLL or the Wave Multiplier or
> > neither?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Chris Jones
> > <techmaster@gmail. com <techmaster% 40gmail.com> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I already have the wasp and love it. :) I
> > can't decide if I like
> > > >> that or the Polivoks more, which is nuts
> > considering the Polivoks was
> > > >> like 3x as much money.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Anthony
> > Rolando
> > > >> <goldenechos@ hotmail.com <goldenechos% 40hotmail. com>> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Good point, if you put a VCA in FRONT of
> > that waveshaper you will find
> > > >> that you will be able to get more out of
> > it...
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Additionally, I wanted to mention the
> > Doepfer A-124 Wasp style filter.
> > > >> > This filter can be VERY mean, even a bit
> > deranged. It is inexpensive,
> > > has
> > > >> multiple outs.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Lastly the Doepfer A-196 PLL. When used
> > as a signal processor this one
> > > >> gets real nasty. Perhaps too much so!
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > TOny
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> To: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com<Doepfer_a100% 40yahoogroups. com>
> > > >> >> From: jari.jokinen@ netikka.fi <jari.jokinen% 40netikka. fi>
> > > >> >> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:25
> > +0000
> > > >> >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am
> > I missing?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Only one VCA and one mixer?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Maybe consider A-132-3 Dual
> > linear/exponential VCA and A-138c
> > > >> >> Polarizing Mixer.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> > > >> > When your life is on the go葉ake your
> > life with you.
> > > >> >
> > http://clk.atdmt. com/MRT/go/ 115298558/ direct/01/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have
> > been removed]
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Chris Jones
> > > >> http://www.doomsday technologies. com
> > > >>
> > > >> ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > > >>
> > > >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > www.elanhickler. com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Chris Jones
> > > http://www.doomsday technologies. com
> > >
> > > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.elanhickler. com
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> 
>

-- 
www.elanhickler. com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-25 by Don Kim

That's what sync is for.


2008/10/25 Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com>:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> The modulator and carrier have to stay exactly in tune with each other,
> that's the problem.
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-25 by Argitoth

That's not what sync is for. First of all, sync only gives you one ratio:
1:1. Secondly, you can't modulate the VCO that is sending the sync. Thirdly,
if the two VCOs in sync are not in tune, you get the classic sync growl
sound which can sound pretty ugly at times, completely unlike FM sounds. But
yes, I do use sync to create aditional harmonics by modulating the synced
VCO with the that is sending the sync. Also, you can use a clock divider to
process the VCO so you get a square wave an octave lower which could be used
to sync a VCO so it's becomes a 1:2 ratio. Then you can use the VCO to
modulate stuff.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Don Kim <dkimcg@gmail.com> wrote:

>   That's what sync is for.
>
> 2008/10/25 Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com <argitoth%40gmail.com>>:
>
> > The modulator and carrier have to stay exactly in tune with each other,
> > that's the problem.
> >
>
>  
>



-- 
www.elanhickler.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-25 by Sean Williams

It seems to me that what you are missing is the time and patience to 
learn how each module works. You might also - dare I say it - have 
TOO MANY modules! I've seen it time and time again: people buying a 
whole lot of kit and expecting miracles without a full and deep 
understanding of each and every piece of kit.

Sure, you may get some lucky results by random patching, but you 
can't hope to deliberately design a sound without putting in the time 
and effort to learn what each module does.

A good start is the Korg MS-10 manual:

http://www.korganalogue.net/korgms/manuals/ms10/m1001.html

Buying new modules at this stage would only be multiplying your 
problems. Stick to what you've got and learn how that works first. 
I've made records with fewer modules than you've got!

best of luck

sean


>Here is my modular as of now:
>
>A110 - VCO
>A110 - VCO
>A145 - LFO1
>A146 - LFO2
>A138b - Log Mixer
>A140 - ADSR
>A140 - ADSR
>A131 - Exp. VCA
>A180 - Multiples
>A180 - Multiples
>A190 - MIDI Interface
>A102 - Diode LPF
>A124 - WASP Filter
>A137 - Wave Multiplier
>Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF
>
>This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
>Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.
>
>Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot. It's
>definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
>else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful. So far, this
>thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest. It does not sound
>like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I
>know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
>key element to fatten it up. Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
>the A-115 divider/suboscillator module. But is that it? If it helps,
>I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal. Is
>the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
>"WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as
>well?
>
>Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
>"typically" patch that in? Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
>then sub-oscillate the mixed signal? Or do you just sub-oscillate one
>oscillator, pre-mixer?
>Thanks!
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-25 by Bakis Sirros

Sean is right.
invest time and effort to learn your modules first.
then you'll see what other modules you might need.


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece

--- On Sat, 10/25/08, Sean Williams <sean@artifactrecords.com> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Sean Williams <sean@artifactrecords.com>
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, October 25, 2008, 8:57 PM






It seems to me that what you are missing is the time and patience to 
learn how each module works. You might also - dare I say it - have 
TOO MANY modules! I've seen it time and time again: people buying a 
whole lot of kit and expecting miracles without a full and deep 
understanding of each and every piece of kit.

Sure, you may get some lucky results by random patching, but you 
can't hope to deliberately design a sound without putting in the time 
and effort to learn what each module does.

A good start is the Korg MS-10 manual:

http://www.korganal ogue.net/ korgms/manuals/ ms10/m1001. html

Buying new modules at this stage would only be multiplying your 
problems. Stick to what you've got and learn how that works first. 
I've made records with fewer modules than you've got!

best of luck

sean

>Here is my modular as of now:
>
>A110 - VCO
>A110 - VCO
>A145 - LFO1
>A146 - LFO2
>A138b - Log Mixer
>A140 - ADSR
>A140 - ADSR
>A131 - Exp. VCA
>A180 - Multiples
>A180 - Multiples
>A190 - MIDI Interface
>A102 - Diode LPF
>A124 - WASP Filter
>A137 - Wave Multiplier
>Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF
>
>This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
>Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.
>
>Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot. It's
>definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
>else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful. So far, this
>thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest. It does not sound
>like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I
>know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
>key element to fatten it up. Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
>the A-115 divider/suboscillat or module. But is that it? If it helps,
>I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal. Is
>the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
>"WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as
>well?
>
>Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
>"typically" patch that in? Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
>then sub-oscillate the mixed signal? Or do you just sub-oscillate one
>oscillator, pre-mixer?
>Thanks!
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-25 by techmaster242

I think that's a good way to put it.  I understand what I have pretty
well, I'm not totally new to how synthesis works.  I've worked with
virtual analog for quite a few years now, but this is my first real
venture into true analog, and don't get me wrong, I definitely think
my modular sounds amazing.  To me, using a modular isn't even about
knowing how each module works, but about trying to figure out ways
that the modules DON'T work, and forcing them to do it anyways.  ;) 
Wiring things in weird ways to yield unpredictable results.  One thing
that I think limits me somewhat is that I only have two oscillators. 
You can have oscillators covering multiple octaves to fatten it up a
bit, but it's still good to have a couple oscillators playing the same
note to get the waves to beat against each other a bit, to liven the
sound up.  With two oscillators, I can't have it both ways, it's
either set them to the same octave, or set them to different octaves.
 I'm thinking the A-115 might free them up from that duty so that I
can have the two oscillators beating each other.  But, I do like the
idea that somebody suggested about getting a make noise mod-demod and
using it to ringmod a VCO against itself.

Some people asked for some demo's of what I've been doing, just go
here to check it out:
http://www.myspace.com/doomsdaytechnologies

Modular Experiment is a patch I just put together to give you an idea
of what I've been doing with it lately.

Modular Preview...the first half of it I believe was a softsynth, and
the modular kicks in right at the midway point.  This was done back
when I only had about 6 modules.

New Sample Track is probably about 7-8 modules being used to modulate
an incoming sound from a Casio VL-1.  (if you're not familiar with one
of these, it's a $20 toy synth from the 80's and it sounds awful)  The
results were pretty wild.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Argitoth <argitoth@...> wrote:
>
> I disagree with Sean a little bit. But I agree with Synth Freak. The
reason
> you are asking to get advice on modules you want shows that you
don't know
> what you want. I guess that's a problem in itself, but there are
some basic
> modules that anyone will benefit from having.
> 
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Bakis Sirros
> <synth_freak_2000@...>wrote:
> 
> >   Sean is right.
> > invest time and effort to learn your modules first.
> > then you'll see what other modules you might need.
> >
> >
> > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> > [Doepfer_a100] group owner
> > www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
> > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> > www. DiN. org. uk
> > www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
> > www. shimarecords. co. uk
> > www. rubberrecords. gr
> > Athens - Greece
> >
> > --- On Sat, 10/25/08, Sean Williams
<sean@...<sean%40artifactrecords.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > From: Sean Williams <sean@... <sean%40artifactrecords.com>
> > >
> > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?
> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Saturday, October 25, 2008, 8:57 PM
> >
> > It seems to me that what you are missing is the time and patience to
> > learn how each module works. You might also - dare I say it - have
> > TOO MANY modules! I've seen it time and time again: people buying a
> > whole lot of kit and expecting miracles without a full and deep
> > understanding of each and every piece of kit.
> >
> > Sure, you may get some lucky results by random patching, but you
> > can't hope to deliberately design a sound without putting in the time
> > and effort to learn what each module does.
> >
> > A good start is the Korg MS-10 manual:
> >
> > http://www.korganal ogue.net/ korgms/manuals/ ms10/m1001. html
> >
> >
> > Buying new modules at this stage would only be multiplying your
> > problems. Stick to what you've got and learn how that works first.
> > I've made records with fewer modules than you've got!
> >
> > best of luck
> >
> > sean
> >
> > >Here is my modular as of now:
> > >
> > >A110 - VCO
> > >A110 - VCO
> > >A145 - LFO1
> > >A146 - LFO2
> > >A138b - Log Mixer
> > >A140 - ADSR
> > >A140 - ADSR
> > >A131 - Exp. VCA
> > >A180 - Multiples
> > >A180 - Multiples
> > >A190 - MIDI Interface
> > >A102 - Diode LPF
> > >A124 - WASP Filter
> > >A137 - Wave Multiplier
> > >Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF
> > >
> > >This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
> > >Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.
> > >
> > >Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot. It's
> > >definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
> > >else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful. So far, this
> > >thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest. It does not sound
> > >like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far,
but I
> > >know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
> > >key element to fatten it up. Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
> > >the A-115 divider/suboscillat or module. But is that it? If it helps,
> > >I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal. Is
> > >the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
> > >"WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to
add as
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > >well?
> > >
> > >Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
> > >"typically" patch that in? Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
> > >then sub-oscillate the mixed signal? Or do you just sub-oscillate one
> > >oscillator, pre-mixer?
> > >Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> www.elanhickler.com
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?

2008-10-25 by Argitoth

I disagree with Sean a little bit. But I agree with Synth Freak. The reason
you are asking to get advice on modules you want shows that you don't know
what you want. I guess that's a problem in itself, but there are some basic
modules that anyone will benefit from having.

On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com>wrote:

>   Sean is right.
> invest time and effort to learn your modules first.
> then you'll see what other modules you might need.
>
>
> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner
> www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> www. DiN. org. uk
> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
> www. shimarecords. co. uk
> www. rubberrecords. gr
> Athens - Greece
>
> --- On Sat, 10/25/08, Sean Williams <sean@artifactrecords.com<sean%40artifactrecords.com>>
> wrote:
>
> From: Sean Williams <sean@artifactrecords.com <sean%40artifactrecords.com>
> >
> Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] What am I missing?
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Saturday, October 25, 2008, 8:57 PM
>
> It seems to me that what you are missing is the time and patience to
> learn how each module works. You might also - dare I say it - have
> TOO MANY modules! I've seen it time and time again: people buying a
> whole lot of kit and expecting miracles without a full and deep
> understanding of each and every piece of kit.
>
> Sure, you may get some lucky results by random patching, but you
> can't hope to deliberately design a sound without putting in the time
> and effort to learn what each module does.
>
> A good start is the Korg MS-10 manual:
>
> http://www.korganal ogue.net/ korgms/manuals/ ms10/m1001. html
>
>
> Buying new modules at this stage would only be multiplying your
> problems. Stick to what you've got and learn how that works first.
> I've made records with fewer modules than you've got!
>
> best of luck
>
> sean
>
> >Here is my modular as of now:
> >
> >A110 - VCO
> >A110 - VCO
> >A145 - LFO1
> >A146 - LFO2
> >A138b - Log Mixer
> >A140 - ADSR
> >A140 - ADSR
> >A131 - Exp. VCA
> >A180 - Multiples
> >A180 - Multiples
> >A190 - MIDI Interface
> >A102 - Diode LPF
> >A124 - WASP Filter
> >A137 - Wave Multiplier
> >Polivoks - Russian LPF/BPF
> >
> >This is all in a mahogany case that I made, very similar to the
> >Doepfer suitcase, using the DIY kit.
> >
> >Here's the deal, I have some more room left, but not a lot. It's
> >definitely starting to fill up, so I need to be careful about what
> >else I put in this thing, that it will truly be useful. So far, this
> >thing sounds pretty good, but I have to be honest. It does not sound
> >like a $2000 synth, which is about what I've put into it so far, but I
> >know what these things are capable of, so I have to be missing some
> >key element to fatten it up. Right off the bat, I'm thinking I need
> >the A-115 divider/suboscillat or module. But is that it? If it helps,
> >I am making industrial music, so thick, harsh sounds are my goal. Is
> >the A-115 the key element that will make this thing make people go
> >"WOW that sounds awesome!" or is there something else I need to add as
> >well?
> >
> >Also, if it is indeed the A-115 that I'm needing, where would you
> >"typically" patch that in? Do you bring two oscillators into a mixer,
> >then sub-oscillate the mixed signal? Or do you just sub-oscillate one
> >oscillator, pre-mixer?
> >Thanks!
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>



-- 
www.elanhickler.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-26 by Bakis Sirros

here is one patch i made back in 2002 for the (excellent) modular planet website:
http://www.modular-planet.de/fx/fmscape/fmscape1024.html
 
its a 4 operator fm patch, two carriers, two modulators.
despite the various sidebands created, the fundamental pitch remains constant and easily perceivable. 
and note that the fm index knobs are set even higher that '6'. despite that, the main pitch still remains very easily recognisable.


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece

--- On Sun, 10/26/08, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, October 26, 2008, 8:14 AM






Bakis, could you post a demo of linear FM when you get the chance?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-26 by Florian Anwander

Hi Argitoth

> So what module would be best for adding harmonics or getting some kind of FM
> sounds? Is it the PLL or the Wave Multiplier or neither?
Sorry, but: get a DX7 ;-)

Florian

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-26 by Frequency Divider

or wait for the quadrature vco %^)

Florian Anwander schreef:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 
> Hi Argitoth
> 
>  > So what module would be best for adding harmonics or getting some 
> kind of FM
>  > sounds? Is it the PLL or the Wave Multiplier or neither?
> Sorry, but: get a DX7 ;-)
> 
> Florian
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1746 - Release Date: 10/25/2008 5:55 PM
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-26 by Argitoth

florian... hi?
thanks bakis!

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Frequency Divider <freq.div@xs4all.nl>wrote:

>   or wait for the quadrature vco %^)
>
> Florian Anwander schreef:
>
> >
> >
> > Hi Argitoth
> >
> > > So what module would be best for adding harmonics or getting some
> > kind of FM
> > > sounds? Is it the PLL or the Wave Multiplier or neither?
> > Sorry, but: get a DX7 ;-)
> >
> > Florian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1746 - Release Date:
> 10/25/2008 5:55 PM
> >
>
>  
>



-- 
www.elanhickler.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-26 by Argitoth

wait, what are you supposed to do with a buncha out of phase sine waves?
what's the quadrature vco do (or going to do)?

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com> wrote:

> florian... hi?
> thanks bakis!
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Frequency Divider <freq.div@xs4all.nl>wrote:
>
>>   or wait for the quadrature vco %^)
>>
>> Florian Anwander schreef:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Argitoth
>> >
>> > > So what module would be best for adding harmonics or getting some
>> > kind of FM
>> > > sounds? Is it the PLL or the Wave Multiplier or neither?
>> > Sorry, but: get a DX7 ;-)
>> >
>> > Florian
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1746 - Release Date:
>> 10/25/2008 5:55 PM
>> >
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>
> --
> www.elanhickler.com
>



-- 
www.elanhickler.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: What am I missing?

2008-10-26 by Derek Holzer

Use it to control 4 VCAs for quad panning or movement though 4 different 
sources (resonant filters/tuned VCOs/etc etc) for harmonic animation, or 
use it to sweep frequencies of 4 VCOs or filters for Shepard Tone effect 
or similar. Just a few ideas, using it as an LFO. Curious to hear what 
people would do with an audio-range quadrature VCO.

D.

Argitoth wrote:
> wait, what are you supposed to do with a buncha out of phase sine waves?
> what's the quadrature vco do (or going to do)?

-- 
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista
---Oblique Strategy # 190:
"You can only make one dot at a time"

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.