Doepfer

so, you want a divider (with odd and even divisions from 1 to 32) module, and a pulse train generator?
you mean that the module should output 52 pulses in sync with its clock input?
so, you have an incoming clock, the divider sets the rate of the output pulses/gates and you also set the number of the output pulses that this module will give?
so, its like a clock divider but with a programmable number of output pulses?
i think i lost you on this...
if anyone other understands this, please help me...
 


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece

--- On Tue, 10/28/08, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Let me hear your bright new ideas for future Doepfer A100 modules!
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 8:51 PM






Bakis, Derek Holzer posted a link to a thread, might as well do the
same: http://modularsynth .net/viewtopic. php?p=13963# 13963

The link to the audio demo worked too, right? The link to the image
works fine for me. Check the thread to see the image. Ok, to answer
your question. I'm talking about only dividing by integers, 1, 2, 3, 4
up to however many. I'm taking into account economic or designing
issues, but I have NO idea how to design a module, that's why I made
them knobs instead of additional LCD screens. Yes, the clock with the
LCD screen should go from 1 to however many is possible, hopefully up
to 1024. So for example, if you want a rhythm in 13/8 time and you
want the rhythm to repeat every 4 measures, you would set the LCD
clock to 52. 13*2*2 = 52 which means 13 beats 4 times, which means 4
measures. Lol, sorry to spell it out.

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Derek Holzer <derek@umatic. nl> wrote:
> Hi Baksis,
>
> http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ OpenSound_ Control
>
> Check my followup posts for some of my ideas.... which are basically
> similar to Guy's suggestion of a USB to CV interface with the ability to
> construct LFOs as well as notes in the computer. However, I think rather
> than bundle a dedicated software with such a controller, which would
> only increase the cost and lock the user into one kind of system, it
> would be better to allow the use of any kind of software which deals
> with OSC (Pure Data, Max/MSP, Reaktor, etc). Because it's an open
> protocol, there could be any number of possible software interfaces, and
> people would be free to design their own. And then the users could
> construct any kind of controlling messages they wish (envelopes,
> repeating or changing LFOs, notes, random modulation, intervals using
> multiple outputs, etc etc).
>
> best!
> Derek
>
> Bakis Sirros wrote:
>> details please.
>> (btw, i do not have any experience with the OSC protocol)
>> anyway, details of the features of this suggested module, please?
>
> --
> derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic. nl ::: http://blog. myspace.com/ macumbista
> ---Oblique Strategy # 24:
> "Bridges
> -build
> -burn"
>
> 

-- 
www.elanhickler. com
 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]