Doepfer

so, the cheap solution would be the base module plus the basic sampler add-on module and the more expensive solution would be the base module plus the full-featured audio or cv recorder add-on module, right?
 


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece

--- On Thu, 10/30/08, Florian Anwander <fanwander@mnet-online.de> wrote:

From: Florian Anwander <fanwander@mnet-online.de>
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Sampler CV/Gate Recorder - was: bright new ideas for future Doepfer A100 modules!
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 5:20 PM






Hi Stu

> i'm personally not a fan of leaving running, looping, one-shotting and
> stopping to the sampler, i think gating it continuously allows more
> control.
If you want to do wavetable like stuff, you need a loop in the 
release-phase of an ADSR.envelope. If you do drummachine like stuff, you 
want the sample have sound even after key release (gate-off), e.g. a 
cymbal sound,

>> trigger(+momentary- switch) for restart
> would a start trigger not do the same anyway? if the module were to be
> controlled by gates (see above) then a retrigger input would indeed
> make sense.
It would make sense also with start AND stop triggers. Imagine some 
dance performance, where the dancer starts a loop by touching a pad, 
another dancer retriggers it by a second pad and a third pad (at the 
other side of the stage) is used for stopping the loop. Three triggers 
for different approach.

> i think there is a danger here of loading the thing up with so many
> features that it becomes a small minority's perfect module, but
> unnecessarily expensive for most others - especially those who would
> potentially buy four or more, interesting though many of these ideas
> are. i suppose it's a matter of taste, but maybe bakis, you could
> include a slimmer version in the poll?
That is why I suggested in a second mail a separation of the sample and 
the control module.

Florian

 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]