Doepfer

maybe you should expand your horizons a bit.It acts quite nicely as a VCO.
It actually smashes the A110 concerning sinewaves.
But be like this man..
Your loss.



On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:41 PM, laryn91 <caymus91@mac.com> wrote:

>   Ah... maybe YOU are the one not reading well ;-)
>
> I asked about a VCO (not LFO).
>
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>,
> achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > You are not reading well:
> > I also said: "Or get an 143-9" I even attached a picture of its near
> perfect
> > sine waves.
> > Or wait for Dieter's quadrature VCO.
> >
> > And yes the 143-9 does not track well in the 1v/oct world (for anyone
> > bothering with that kind of futilities).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:17 PM, laryn91 <caymus91@...> wrote:
> >
> > > I originally asked if anybody sold a VCO with undistorted sine outputs.
> > > In summary here
> > > are the replies I got:
> > >
> > > 1 - Manufactures claim they can spec any wave with rounded peaks as
> "Sine".
> > > Even if you
> > > can clearly hear even harmonic distortion - any roundish looking shape
> is a
> > > close enough
> > > to be called a Sine.
> > >
> > > 2 - Analog vs. Digital religion states that analog must always remain
> > > imprecise because
> > > that is its character. We don't want a clean analog wave with no added
> > > harmonics in our
> > > system because that would make it digital.
> > >
> > > 3 - Finally the topic police posted their overall disapproval of this
> > > discussion. Even
> > > banning members was suggested!
> > >
> > > So I learned if you want a real sine wave (as defined by Fourier), get
> > > Plan-B Model 15...
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100%
> 40yahoogroups.com>, york
> > > luethje <ybl@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Why ban people? I found the debate lively at first, although it later
> > > turned somewhat
> > > obnoxious. Dieter Doepfer has given an excellent reply and I think
> matters
> > > should rest
> > > there.
> > > >
> > > > York
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: kovski774 <kovski@>
> > >
> > > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100%
> 40yahoogroups.com>
>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 6:30:55 AM
> > > > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: starting a modular - Z3000 waveform
> quality?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > or perhaps we can just ban argitoth? the guy's a trainwreck, spoils
> > > > every message board he signs up to with inane opinions presented as
> > > > fact and a TOTAL lack of self awareness.
> > > >
> > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com, Bakis Sirros
> > > > <synth_freak_ 2000@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, good idea. i can then NOT join that group...
> > > > >
> > > > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> > > > > [Doepfer_a100] group owner
> > > > > www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> > > > > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
> > > > > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> > > > > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> > > > > www. DiN. org. uk
> > > > > www. musicamaximamagneti ca. com
> > > > > www. shimarecords. co. uk
> > > > > www. rubberrecords. gr
> > > > > Athens - Greece
> > > > >
> > > > > --- On Tue, 11/25/08, Frequency Divider <freq.div@ .> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Frequency Divider <freq.div@ .>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: starting a modular - Z3000 waveform
> > > > quality?
> > > > > To: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com
> > > > > Date: Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 9:31 PM
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > i would like to suggest the creation of a seperate list or yahoo
> > > > group
> > > > > for any future sine wave purity discussions. you could even join
> > > > the
> > > > > alternate tunings list for obsessive talk about tuning the vco in
> > > > cents
> > > > > and fractions of cents
> > > > >
> > > > > Argitoth schreef:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > btw, here's the Tip Top Audio VCO waveform test:
> > > > > > http://www.muffwigg ler.com/forum/ viewtopic. php?t=2158
> > > > > > <http://www.muffwigg ler.com/forum/ viewtopic. php?t=2158>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is it just me or does Analogue Systems VCO produce better
> > > > traingles and
> > > > > > sines?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks James,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Laryn91, I just recorded my synth using the filter as a
> > > > waveshaper.
> > > > > > Good tracking is not needed, you just have to patch a 1v/oct
> > > > signal
> > > > > > into the filter's VC, but that VC needs an attenuator. You don't
> > > > want
> > > > > > to give it full VC. Here's the recording:
> > > > > > http://www.elanhick ler.com/misc/ filter-waveshapi ng-test.wav
> > > > > > <http://www.elanhick ler.com/misc/ filter-waveshapi ng-test.wav>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Raw sound without filtering.
> > > > > > 2. With filtering (notice how you can't hear low notes, that's
> > > > how it
> > > > > > should be with sine waves, however the problem is that low notes
> > > > also
> > > > > > have small peaks)
> > > > > > 3. With filtering used as a modulator (the lesser peaks means
> > > > it's not
> > > > > > good as a modulator, not enough volume anymore)
> > > > > > 4. Without filtering used as a pitch modulator (this is how the
> > > > > > modulation should sound)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hmm... Its anyone's guess if a filter is really worth using as a
> > > > waveshaper.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com
> > > > > > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.10/1810 - Release Date:
> > > > 11/24/2008 2:36 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]