Go on be naive. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:19 PM, laryn91 <caymus91@mac.com> wrote: > You must fall into this group: > > > " I'm guessing you're either unfamiliar with or never > > designed sounds > > using Additive Synthesis. " > > I and many others successfully use Additive techniques on our analog > synthesizers every > day. Just because YOU can't or don't know how, you shouldn't make pompus > blanket > statements like yours below. > > It only exposes your lack of depth in analog synthesis techniques ;-) > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>, > achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> > wrote: > > > > "For example, if you wanted to create a sound similar in character and > > dynamics > > of a flute, you could probably make a pretty good one controlling 3 or 4 > > sine wave > > oscillators as the excitation. There are many sources for info on the web > > about Additive > > Synthesis if you're interested." > > > > > > I think it is rather extremely naïve that you think you can model natural > > sounds with additive synthesis.History has proven that many people > thought > > it was possible but failed in the end. > > Why? > > They could not get the phases of the seperate sine building blocks > correctly > > lined up with analog oscillators. > > I guess you could do with reading some of monsieur Fourier's theory. > > > > It wasn't until computers got significantly powerful enough that > Fourier's > > theories could be implemented fully. > > And then still.... > > > > I have nothing against additive synthesis and i understand your need for > > true sine function oscillators for this. > > But please don't act like additive synthesis is going to give you a good > > imitation of an 'existing real life' sound.. > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:49 PM, laryn91 <caymus91@...> wrote: > > > > > By your question, I'm guessing you're either unfamiliar with or never > > > designed sounds > > > using Additive Synthesis. But quality sines are a necessary component > for > > > these cool class > > > of sounds. For example, if you wanted to create a sound similar in > > > character and dynamics > > > of a flute, you could probably make a pretty good one controlling 3 or > 4 > > > sine wave > > > oscillators as the excitation. There are many sources for info on the > web > > > about Additive > > > Synthesis if you're interested. You can't make the same type of dynamic > > > sounds with only > > > subtractive synthesis. > > > > > > I also find the sine very useful as a natural sounding modulation > source. > > > The A-111 > > > rounded peak triangle wave lacks that natural characteristic. And if > you > > > want more fine > > > and subtle control for FM, nothing beats a sine! > > > > > > A sine wave is useful as building block only if it contains the > fundamental > > > and no > > > overtones. An audibly distorted sine wave is not "character", but > > > imprecision and > > > sloppiness. If the A-111 outputs a triangle-with-rounded-peaks, it > should > > > not mislead > > > customers and spec it as a "Sine". Call it Tri2 or Soft Tri instead. A > Sine > > > means something > > > very specific: > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_wave > > > > > > If the A-111 produced ramped or rounded edge waves at its "Square" wave > out > > > jack - > > > would you think that's "character " or just a faulty or bad design? > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100% > 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > > Monroe Eskew <monroe.eskew@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm just curious what relevance to music is. It doesn't make sense to > > > > complain when a flute doesn't produce a pure sine. Each instrument > > > > has its own character and musical desirability. Lots of the best > > > > tones from analog synths are far from pure sine. I can see why > > > > someone would want that pure sine sound in a particular musical > > > > application, but can't you approximate it well enough for musical > > > > purposes with standard equipment like A111 or RS95, or as you mention > > > > M15 or ZO? If you run it through a strong LPF with no resonance then > > > > you further shape the wave towards sine perfection. > > > > > > > > I'm just wondering if you are interested in musical applications or > > > > maybe scientific applications instead? Or are you just a > > > > perfectionist? (It's OK if you are.) > > > > > > > > Monroe > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 29, 2008, at 8:20 AM, laryn91 wrote: > > > > > > > > > I don't get it either. All I asked is if anyone knows of any euro > > > > > VCO that can produce a sine > > > > > wave without audible harmonic distortion (Plan-B and ZO so far). To > > > > > me this a very useful > > > > > feature. > > > > > > > > > > But my request seems to get hijacked by self-righteous posters who > > > > > expect everyone to > > > > > either adopt their personal analog synthesis religion or justify > > > > > their inability to hear > > > > > harmonic distortion. > > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com<Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100% > 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > "madrayken" <dene.carter@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Only just joined this curiously tense thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there something so fundamentally (unintended joke) annoying > about > > > > > > wanting sine waves when spending well over a thousand pounds on a > > > > > > mono-synth? > > > > > > > > > > > > *I* want sine waves as pure as possible because I like using ring > > > > > mod > > > > > > which tends to sound rather nasty and noisy with anything other > than > > > > > > pure sines. I know because I've tried using things other than > sine > > > > > > waves, not because someone told me so. > > > > > > > > > > > > I heard the A110 wasn't a pure sine. > > > > > > I bought an A111 and a dual cwejman instead. > > > > > > They produce nice non-noisy sines and the ring mod produced > sounds > > > > > > good to my ears. > > > > > > I am now happy. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm happy to hear what solutions other people have found to the > > > > > > pure-sine dilemma. I'm also happy to hear that other people don't > > > > > care > > > > > > about pure sines - that's interesting in itself, and I love > hearing > > > > > > the work-arounds. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can't we all move on or play nice? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com<Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>, > > > Monroe Eskew <monroe.eskew@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So what is the purpose of this? Isn't a slightly imperfect sine > > > > > > > impossible to distinguish aurally? And can't you filter out any > > > > > > > imperfections to near-silence with an LPF? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 28, 2008, at 10:02 AM, laryn91 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My ZO starts to distort at lower freqs (looks like a square > with > > > > > > > > rounded corners). So it's a > > > > > > > > sine for only part of its range. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not so much interested about whose *distorted* sine wave > > > > > sounds > > > > > > > > best, but who's sine > > > > > > > > output actually has no audible harmonic distortion (i.e > > > > > fundamental > > > > > > > > only). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In > Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>, > > > > Bakis Sirros > > > > > > > > <synth_freak_2000@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or maybe Cyndustries Zeroscillator...i think that should > > > > > also have > > > > > > > > a very good sinewave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that said, i also really like a lot the sine of the A111's > > > > > (i use > > > > > > > > them all the time!) and the > > > > > > > > sine of the AFG (regarding Euro). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory > Geist > > > > > > > > > [Doepfer_a100] group owner > > > > > > > > > www. parallel - worlds - music. com > > > > > > > > > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic > > > > > > > > > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic > > > > > > > > > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist > > > > > > > > > www. DiN. org. uk > > > > > > > > > www. musicamaximamagnetica. com > > > > > > > > > www. shimarecords. co. uk > > > > > > > > > www. rubberrecords. gr > > > > > > > > > Athens - Greece > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 11/28/08, laryn91 <caymus91@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: laryn91 <caymus91@> > > > > > > > > > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: starting a modular - Z3000 > > > > > waveform > > > > > > > > quality? > > > > > > > > > To: > Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > > > > > > > Date: Friday, November 28, 2008, 7:17 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I originally asked if anybody sold a VCO with undistorted > sine > > > > > > > > outputs. In summary here > > > > > > > > > are the replies I got: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 - Manufactures claim they can spec any wave with rounded > > > > > peaks > > > > > > > > as "Sine". Even if > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > can clearly hear even harmonic distortion - any roundish > > > > > looking > > > > > > > > shape is a close > > > > > > > > enough > > > > > > > > > to be called a Sine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 - Analog vs. Digital religion states that analog must > always > > > > > > > > remain imprecise because > > > > > > > > > that is its character. We don't want a clean analog wave > > > > > with no > > > > > > > > added harmonics in our > > > > > > > > > system because that would make it digital. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3 - Finally the topic police posted their overall > > > > > disapproval of > > > > > > > > this discussion. Even > > > > > > > > > banning members was suggested! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I learned if you want a real sine wave (as defined by > > > > > Fourier), > > > > > > > > get Plan-B Model 15... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com, york luethje <ybl@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why ban people? I found the debate lively at first, > > > > > although it > > > > > > > > later turned somewhat > > > > > > > > > obnoxious. Dieter Doepfer has given an excellent reply and > I > > > > > think > > > > > > > > matters should rest > > > > > > > > > there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > York > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > > > > > > From: kovski774 <kovski@> > > > > > > > > > > To: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 6:30:55 AM > > > > > > > > > > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: starting a modular - Z3000 > > > > > waveform > > > > > > > > quality? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or perhaps we can just ban argitoth? the guy's a > trainwreck, > > > > > > > > spoils > > > > > > > > > > every message board he signs up to with inane opinions > > > > > presented > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > fact and a TOTAL lack of self awareness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com, Bakis Sirros > > > > > > > > > > <synth_freak_ 2000@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes, good idea. i can then NOT join that group... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / > Memory > > > > > Geist > > > > > > > > > > > [Doepfer_a100] group owner > > > > > > > > > > > www. parallel - worlds - music. com > > > > > > > > > > > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic > > > > > > > > > > > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic > > > > > > > > > > > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist > > > > > > > > > > > www. DiN. org. uk > > > > > > > > > > > www. musicamaximamagneti ca. com > > > > > > > > > > > www. shimarecords. co. uk > > > > > > > > > > > www. rubberrecords. gr > > > > > > > > > > > Athens - Greece > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 11/25/08, Frequency Divider <freq.div@ .> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Frequency Divider <freq.div@ .> > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: starting a modular - > Z3000 > > > > > > > > waveform > > > > > > > > > > quality? > > > > > > > > > > > To: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 9:31 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i would like to suggest the creation of a seperate list > > > > > or yahoo > > > > > > > > > > group > > > > > > > > > > > for any future sine wave purity discussions. you could > > > > > even join > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > alternate tunings list for obsessive talk about tuning > > > > > the vco > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > cents > > > > > > > > > > > and fractions of cents > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Argitoth schreef: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > btw, here's the Tip Top Audio VCO waveform test: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.muffwigg ler.com/forum/ viewtopic. > php?t=2158 > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://www.muffwigg ler.com/forum/ viewtopic. > > > php?t=2158 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it just me or does Analogue Systems VCO produce > > > > > better > > > > > > > > > > traingles and > > > > > > > > > > > > sines? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks James, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Laryn91, I just recorded my synth using the filter as > a > > > > > > > > > > waveshaper. > > > > > > > > > > > > Good tracking is not needed, you just have to patch a > > > > > 1v/oct > > > > > > > > > > signal > > > > > > > > > > > > into the filter's VC, but that VC needs an > attenuator. > > > > > You > > > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > > want > > > > > > > > > > > > to give it full VC. Here's the recording: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.elanhick ler.com/misc/ filter-waveshapi > ng- > > > > > test.wav > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://www.elanhick ler.com/misc/ filter-waveshapi > > > > > > ng-test.wav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Raw sound without filtering. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. With filtering (notice how you can't hear low > > > > > notes, that's > > > > > > > > > > how it > > > > > > > > > > > > should be with sine waves, however the problem is > that > > > > > low > > > > > > > > notes > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > have small peaks) > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. With filtering used as a modulator (the lesser > > > > > peaks means > > > > > > > > > > it's not > > > > > > > > > > > > good as a modulator, not enough volume anymore) > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Without filtering used as a pitch modulator (this > > > > > is how > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > modulation should sound) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... Its anyone's guess if a filter is really worth > > > > > using > > > > > > > > as a > > > > > > > > > > waveshaper. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- > > > > > > > > --------- - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > > > > > > > > > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com > > > > > > > > > > > > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.10/1810 - > > > > > Release > > > > > > > > Date: > > > > > > > > > > 11/24/2008 2:36 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: starting a modular - Z3000 waveform quality?
2008-12-01 by achtung_999
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.