Sorry, I missed the "will" part :-p I had this link to the Aries VCO in one of the posts on this (endless) thread. This is an excellent tri-to-sine converter (I can't hear any additional overtones). Better than the more common 3080 converter and significantly better than your diode converter. Aries claimed to produce <1% THD. http://www.leinermedia.net/aries/AriesSchematics/AR-317s.gif I'm not sure why you found adding a slightly filtered triangle sounding wave useful when there's already a triangle wave output. My suggestion is if your customers are not interested in a clean Sine output, use the panel real estate for something more useful. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <yahoo@...> wrote: > > You find my answers written inline. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von laryn91 > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2008 17:20 > > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Sine wave discussion > > > > > > > And we will point out in the module information and user's guide of > A-110 > > > and A-111 that the sine outputs should be called more precisely > "sine-like". > > > > Dieter, > > > > It's probably just me, but where do you point that out for the A-111? > > I wrote that "we will", not that "we did". That's the future tense from what > I learned in scool - but I'm not a native speaker. > > > >If you want a perfect sine you need a VCO with a sine core. > > > > Instead of an impossible "perfect sine", how about just a sine with no > *audible* overtones > > (<1% THD) like Arp, Moog, Aries, Polyfusion, EML,etc. used to make? That > would now > > make the A-111 useful for additive synthesis and FM. > > > > All you need to do is copy their simple but superior > > triangle-to-sine converter design. ;-) > > Though I can't believe that they really reach <1% THD (but indeed I never > measured it): do you (or anybody else in the group) know the circuitry of > these converters. Are they made with diodes, OTAs or the JFET circuit (these > are the three triangle-to-sine converter principles I know). I don't have > the schematics of these VCOs. > > We would have offered a VCO with a more perfect sine in the past. But it > took more than 12 years (the A-111 is available since spring 1996) until > someone complained about the poor sine. I'll see what we can do. Maybe we > offer a small tri-to-sine converter board for the A-111-1 that can be used > instead of the simple diode converter. > > There was a similar discussion about 2 years ago (~ September 2006) and Tim > Stinchcombe suggested an improved sine wave converter based on the JFET > principle. We have built a prototype of this converter in 2006 but the > discussion fell asleep very soon and it seemed that nobody was interested > anymore. We could dig this design and offer it as an addendum to the A-111-1 > or equip all new A-111-1 with this board. The additional charges would be in > the 15 Euro range (about 10 electronical parts mounted on a small board). > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer >
Message
Re: Sine wave discussion
2008-12-02 by laryn91
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.