sorry, you are right. my fault! laryn91 schrieb: > > That's in the A-110 info page - NOT the A-111. Right? > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>, Pieter Volger <volger@...> wrote: > > > > RTFM > > > > "_Technical remarks: > > _The core of the A-110 is a sawtooth oscillator (in contrast to the > > A-111-1 <http://www.doepfer.de/a111.htm > <http://www.doepfer.de/a111.htm>>, which is based on a triangle > > oscillator). The other waveforms are derived from the sawtooth by > > internal waveform converters. As the sawtooth reset (i.e. the > > back-to-zero slope) is not infinite fast but takes a little bit of time > > the derived waveforms triangle and sine are not perfect ! At the top of > > the waveform they have a small glitch or notch that is caused by the > > sawtooth reset and cannot be eliminated by the waveform converters. The > > sine is derived from the triangle by a simple diode-based converter and > > the sine shape is not perfect (only a rounded triangle). > > If a perfect triangle is required the A-111-1 > > <http://www.doepfer.de/a111.htm <http://www.doepfer.de/a111.htm>> is > recommended. For a perfect sine the > > quadrature LFO/VCO A-143-9 <http://www.doepfer.de/a1439.htm > <http://www.doepfer.de/a1439.htm>> is recommended. > > " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > laryn91 schrieb: > > > > > > > And we will point out in the module information and user's guide of > > > A-110 > > > > and A-111 that the sine outputs should be called more precisely > > > "sine-like". > > > > > > Dieter, > > > > > > It's probably just me, but where do you point that out for the A-111? > > > In my A-111 manual > > > you say just the opposite: > > > > > > "Sine waves are pure waves: they just contain the > > > fundamental, without any harmonics (see Fig. 5). > > > They are thus not suitable for subtractive synthesis > > > (shaping sound with a filter) - as there's nothing to take > > > away!" > > > > > > To the contrary, the A-111 sine is still suitable for subtractive > > > synthesis. To be accurate, > > > you should say "not suitable for additive synthesis" instead. > > > > > > >If you want a perfect sine you need a VCO > > > > with a sine core. > > > > > > Instead of an impossible "perfect sine", how about just a sine > with no > > > *audible* overtones > > > (<1% THD) like Arp, Moog, Aries, Polyfusion, EML,etc. used to make? > > > That would now > > > make the A-111 useful for additive synthesis and FM. > > > > > > All you need to do is copy their simple but superior triangle-to-sine > > > converter design. ;-) > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > > > <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>, <yahoo@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I will not participate in the emotional discussion about sine waves > > > but want > > > > to mention some technical details (some of these have been already > > > mentioned > > > > earlier): > > > > > > > > All standard VCO circuits I know are based on a sawtooth or > triangle > > > core. > > > > When the sine wave is derived from one of these VCO cores you > will never > > > > obtain a perfect sine. The antiparallel diodes are the simplest > > > solution to > > > > derive a sine-like wave from a triangle, the FET circuit is a bit > > > better but > > > > even far away from beeing perfect. Each kind of waveform > converter is a > > > > compromise (except rectangle). If you want a perfect sine you > need a VCO > > > > with a sine core. And in return: if you want a perfect triangle you > > > need a > > > > VCO with a triangle core, if you want a perfect sawtooth ... > > > > > > > > The A-143-9 is the only oscillator in the A-100 that uses a sine > core. > > > > Though it was not planned as a VCO but mainly VCLFO it can be > > > (ab)used as > > > > sine VCO. The main drawback of the A-143-9 is the missing > temperature > > > > compensation of the exponential generator. We consider to develop a > > > sine VCO > > > > based on the A-143-9 circuit but with a temperature compensated > > > exponential > > > > generator. I expect that the price would be in the Euro 100 range. > > > We are > > > > also working on a VCO with sine core and linear FM with thru-zero > > > feature. > > > > But this is another "construction site" because the linear FM and > > > thru-zero > > > > feature is much more complicated than adding "only" the temperature > > > > compensation. > > > > > > > > And we will point out in the module information and user's guide of > > > A-110 > > > > and A-111 that the sine outputs should be called more precisely > > > "sine-like". > > > > But even rectangles or triangles are not perfect (each rectangle is > > > kind of > > > > trapezoid as each rising and falling edge has a slope that depends > > > on the > > > > inherent slew limiting characteristic of analog circuitry). > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > Dieter Doepfer > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Sine wave discussion
2008-12-02 by Pieter Volger
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.