Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: [Doepfer_a100] the sine story continues ...

2008-12-03 by Bakis Sirros

hi Dieter,
 
ok, i'll make this poll soon.
 
thanks,
Bakis. (a Very Tolerant moderator)
 


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
www. rubberrecords. gr
Athens - Greece

--- On Tue, 12/2/08, yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de> wrote:

From: yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de>
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] the sine story continues ...
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 8:13 PM






> And probably why vendors like Doepfer put no engineering effort into
sines - customers
> want fat unstable waves - not precise thin waves!

We will put efforts into sines and we already have ! We have the existing
A-143-9 quadrature oscillator which has probably a more perfect sine than
all the other oscillators your mentioned. And you also ignored my suggestion
to improve the A-143-9 by adding a temperature compensation. We definitely
listen to what our customers want to have. Most of the newer A-100 modules
are based on ideas and suggestions of this group ! But it needs to be more
than one interested user before start a new design or redesign. So lets
start with a poll how many users would be interested in

a) improved tri-to-sine converter for A-111-1 (about Euro 15 additional
charges)
b) temperature compensated exponential generator for the A-143-9 (about Euro
30 additional charges)

I think that's much more constructive than to offend other users.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer

 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.