You have a small point there. It is pretty clinical, yes. But he does introduce the same source material to all the filters, which could be a nice way to compare. It is at least the most unbiased filter comparison I've seen. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Argitoth <argitoth@gmail.com> wrote: > crap... looks like I'm not done with this. > > achtung_999, listening to the filter shootout files, I really felt > like it was all done extremely clinically to the point that I don't > think the filters had a chance to shine in their own ways. That's why > I was suggesting someone post an audio demo of the Wasp filter because > that person would probably post something not so clinical. I just feel > like the filter shootout is a bad way to decide if you like a filter > or not. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Doepfer SEM VCF A-106-5 vs Wasp Filter
2008-12-04 by achtung_999
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.