Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

[Doepfer_a100] Re: Let me hear your bright new ideas for future Doepfer A100 mod

2008-12-04 by Adam-V

The other bonus would be the ability to patch in oscillators other
than the A110/111.

For those not wanting to add modules for this purpose perhaps both
types of conversion could be offered on the oscillator board itself
with a user selectable link to pre-set whichever version of sine is
required? I wouldn't think it would add that much more to the cost of
the module to do this would it?

Cheers,
Adam-V

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@...> wrote:
>
> nice idea!
> 
> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner
> www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> www. DiN. org. uk
> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
> www. shimarecords. co. uk
> www. rubberrecords. gr
> Athens - Greece
> 
> --- On Thu, 12/4/08, James Husted <ersatzplanet@...> wrote:
> 
> From: James Husted <ersatzplanet@...>
> Subject: Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Let me hear your bright new
ideas for future Doepfer A100 module
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 8:30 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This would be a good solution because I would imagine you can plug 
> other waveforms than a triangle to get odd shaped waves for outputs. 
> Would that work too?
> -James
> 
> On Dec 4, 2008, at 12:55 AM, yahoo@doepfer. de wrote:
> 
> > > How about a basic triangle to sine wave shaper module? It could have
> > > Triangle In, Original Triangle Out and the best possible Sine Out 
> > that
> > > can be achieved. You could even fit two of them onto a 4HP panel.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Adam-V
> >
> > Good idea. This would not require to solder a module to install the
> > modification. And every user could decide if he wants a better sine 
> > or not.
> > But it would be more expensive than the internal modifications 
> > because it's
> > mostly the mechanics (front panel, sockets, potentiometers and 
> > knobs) that
> > is responible for the price of a module. The internal modification 
> > would be
> > in the Euro 10-20 range, whereas the prise of the module version 
> > would be at
> > least in the Euro 50 range for a dual tri-to-sine converter.
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Dieter Doepfer
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.