The other bonus would be the ability to patch in oscillators other than the A110/111. For those not wanting to add modules for this purpose perhaps both types of conversion could be offered on the oscillator board itself with a user selectable link to pre-set whichever version of sine is required? I wouldn't think it would add that much more to the cost of the module to do this would it? Cheers, Adam-V --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@...> wrote: > > nice idea! > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist > [Doepfer_a100] group owner > www. parallel - worlds - music. com > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist > www. DiN. org. uk > www. musicamaximamagnetica. com > www. shimarecords. co. uk > www. rubberrecords. gr > Athens - Greece > > --- On Thu, 12/4/08, James Husted <ersatzplanet@...> wrote: > > From: James Husted <ersatzplanet@...> > Subject: Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Let me hear your bright new ideas for future Doepfer A100 module > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 8:30 PM > > > > > > > This would be a good solution because I would imagine you can plug > other waveforms than a triangle to get odd shaped waves for outputs. > Would that work too? > -James > > On Dec 4, 2008, at 12:55 AM, yahoo@doepfer. de wrote: > > > > How about a basic triangle to sine wave shaper module? It could have > > > Triangle In, Original Triangle Out and the best possible Sine Out > > that > > > can be achieved. You could even fit two of them onto a 4HP panel. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Adam-V > > > > Good idea. This would not require to solder a module to install the > > modification. And every user could decide if he wants a better sine > > or not. > > But it would be more expensive than the internal modifications > > because it's > > mostly the mechanics (front panel, sockets, potentiometers and > > knobs) that > > is responible for the price of a module. The internal modification > > would be > > in the Euro 10-20 range, whereas the prise of the module version > > would be at > > least in the Euro 50 range for a dual tri-to-sine converter. > > > > Best wishes > > Dieter Doepfer > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
[Doepfer_a100] Re: Let me hear your bright new ideas for future Doepfer A100 mod
2008-12-04 by Adam-V
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.