Hehe. If one has 4HP of space left, a 4HP unit fits better of course. Having a knob at each 4HP, makes the knob spacing same as in A-155 sequencer... not totally un-ergonomic. Still, I would prefer a 6HP 3- channel unit. Space usage efficiency would be the same. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Steven Taylor" <steev@...> wrote: > > The 4HP attenuator will fit perfectly in my minicase alongside the > PlanB ELF modules I've got... and passive too. I'm sold :) > > S > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:47 PM, jalmari3 <jari.jokinen@...> wrote: > > How about a 6HP 3-channel attenuator? It could be possible, if the > > jacks were in rows of two. Perhaps the ergonomics would be better > > then due to more horizontal "headroom" for the knobs. (I would prefer > > all knobs up and all jacks down arrangement a la Cwejman, but that is > > just me.) > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "jalmari3" <jari.jokinen@> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> These are the only 4HP Doepfer modules with knobs, aren't they? > > Will > >> the knobs be normal sized? > >> > >> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <yahoo@> wrote: > >> > > >> > We have added two simple modules to our list of planned modules: > >> > > >> > A-183-1 simple passive dual attenuator > >> > A-183-2 single offset generator/attenuator/polarizer/amplifier > >> > > >> > The modules are planned for combination with other modules that > >> have no > >> > attenuators and/or offset controls available. Mainly to combine A- > >> 100 > >> > modules with modules from other manufacturers because most of the > > A- > >> 100 > >> > modules are already equipped with attenuator and manual control > > of > >> the > >> > parameter in question. > >> > > >> > Details on our website: www.doepfer.com > PRODUCTS > A-100 > > >> Future/new > >> > modules > >> > > >> > Best wishes > >> > Dieter Doepfer > >> > > >> > > > > >
Message
Re: New announcement
2008-12-12 by jalmari3
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.