Doepfer

On 6/20/02 7:58 PM, "unknown freak" <ospengler@rcn.com> wrote:

> I have both -- 116 and 136 -- and like each much, for different things.
> The 136 may be in some sense more versatile, but I find what the 116 can
> do, particularly with sines but also generally with various types of VC
> clipping and symmetry and roughening, interesting and useful.

ok, I think you are right, they both have a place, but I guess I thought the
116 was a bit lackluster it what you would expect it to do.
I think I use the 116 more now that I have 136's(not more than the 136s)
... it's just that the 116 is reasonably subtle, and it was never what I
expected before I guess. still I don't think the 116 is a "great" module by
any means and would have trouble recommending it, although it can be quite
useful. But, I would highly recommend the 136, a very versatile module.

> 
> Why delete it from the menu?

yeah...keep it, it does have it's place.
-phil