> "but that > said you can get a much cleaner BBD sound in other units" > what other manufacturers would you suggest? Not cheap or Eurorack but the Moogerfooger gives you an easy to use BBD sound with CV on the main and relative high fidelity in a longer delay range. The RS-120 Module previously talked about has a short delay range that lies entirely below the Moogerfooger. I have a Blacet Time Machine (Frac format), it has some clean up circuitry for the BBD (not bypassable). It has bipolar feedback and lets you run the chip in more extreme ranges - like the Doepfer and unlike the Moogerfooger. It falls inbetween in terms of fidelity, the Moogerfooger sounds substantially cleaner. While not a module and not VC controllable at all, the BBD based Behringer Vintage delay pedal with 300ms of delay. Costs under US $30. I keep thinking maybe one might be able to attach a vactrol controller to the pots. There is no onboard LFO. Cwejman announced a quad line delay. Don't know if it will be analog. The individual CV and outs seem like a good choice for putting together ensemble effect Oh and by the way, the ASystems RS-310 Reverb/Chorus uses a multitapped chip as does the A-188-2. It's a substantially cleaned up sound in comparison but gives you no real indepth control. Just a VC rate and wet/dry mix, feedback is manual and output is just mono. nick kent
Message
Re: Processing Rack Suggestions
2009-01-11 by zaum
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.