Doepfer

i agree with Ingo.

in the end, we win more space when all of the modules are not in multiples of 4HP...


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist

[Doepfer_a100] group owner

www. parallel - worlds - music. com

www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic

www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic

www. myspace. com/ memorygeist

www. DiN. org. uk

www. musicamaximamagnetica. com

www. shimarecords. co. uk

www. rubberrecords. gr

Athens - Greece

--- On Mon, 10/5/09, selfoscillate <synaptic_music@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: selfoscillate <synaptic_music@yahoo.com>
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A132-4 Quad Exp VCA/Mixer.
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 1:11 PM






 




    
                  

yes, i can see that point, but even some of

the earliest modules had different widths,

like the a110 (10 te). we have to deal with that

since 15 years and it never felt like a real

problem to me. this is, of course, only my opinion.



best wishes



ingo



--- In Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com, "spiralsect" <adam-v@...> wrote:

>

> You are not alone Florian. I dislike the need to arrange my modules like a jigsaw puzzle in order to eliminate a 2TE gap. I know you can get the small blanking panels but it is an annoying waste of space.

> 

> Cheers,

> Adam-V

> --- In Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com, Florian Anwander <fanwander@> wrote:

> > It seems I am the only person who does not like the diversification to 

> > 4TE, 6TE, 8TE, 10TE. (I'd prefer multiples of "4").

> > 

> > Florian

> >

>




 

      

    
    
	
	 
	
	








	


	
	


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]