Doepfer

I tend to agree with Ingo, not really a problem for me. Some modules
from other makers in my system have odd number sized panels like 15hp
which is a pain - unless you buy two.
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * *
David Salter
Senior Consultant
SSG UKI

Thomson Reuters

O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402
M 07990562402

david.salter@thomsonreuters.com
thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/> 
 
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

 

________________________________

From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of selfoscillate
Sent: 05 October 2009 11:12
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A132-4 Quad Exp VCA/Mixer.


  


yes, i can see that point, but even some of
the earliest modules had different widths,
like the a110 (10 te). we have to deal with that
since 15 years and it never felt like a real
problem to me. this is, of course, only my opinion.

best wishes

ingo

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> , "spiralsect" <adam-v@...>
wrote:
>
> You are not alone Florian. I dislike the need to arrange my modules
like a jigsaw puzzle in order to eliminate a 2TE gap. I know you can get
the small blanking panels but it is an annoying waste of space.
> 
> Cheers,
> Adam-V
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> , Florian Anwander <fanwander@>
wrote:
> > It seems I am the only person who does not like the diversification
to 
> > 4TE, 6TE, 8TE, 10TE. (I'd prefer multiples of "4").
> > 
> > Florian
> >
>






This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]