Or even some nifty, inexpensive, CV'd DOEPFER ENVELOPES! :-D Easier, -Mike --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., unknown freak <ospengler@r...> wrote: > Jesus, that Elhardt/Schreiber exchange is hilarious and just piquantly > deranged and nasty. Paul just goes off the deep end on the thing. And > all his talk about his perfect analog electronics ... Indeed, what a > perfectionist. Elhardt needs a poorly-designed Moog envelope to kick > the crap out of his MOTM. Or maybe one of those zippy "overpriced" > Technosauri. > > > its_peake wrote: > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "ringmod45" <ringmod45@y...> wrote: > > <snip> > > > i want to enlighten a few of you as to how a company should react and > > > use its group members for input on its new and upcoming designs. > > > > > > THE GROUP IN QUESTION IS MOTM. please go to the group and read how > > > the designers and customers work together in order to release a > > > product. layout and design features are planned and discussed to > > > avoid any screw ups or lack of features. > > > > Are you referring to this discovery: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/message/15562 > > > > This conclusion: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/message/15617 > > > > And this response: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/message/15619 > > > > (Sorry, no money-back guarantee like Synthesizers.com) > > > > These classic responses to new feature requests: > > > > > - VC ADSR, > > > > ZZZzzzzzzzzz......... > > > > Subject: Re: [AH] 2002 preview / MOTM > > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:17:50 -0600 > > > > 24dB Highpass filters: > > > > > > Later, this is probably the least useful of any filter. > > > > > > Strongly disagree. I consider my Doepfer -24 dB filter one of the > > coolest sound-sculpting > > tools > > > I've ever used. > > > > If you like frying bacon sounds :) > > > > Subject: Re: [AH] 2002 preview / MOTM > > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 22:46:37 -0600 > > > > Or the fact that the MO*M forum is censored? > > > > http://www.the-gas-station.com/messages.cfm?Type=normal&thread_id= > > 46823񏃄 > > > > http://www.the-gas-station.com/messages.cfm?Type=normal&thread_id= > > 46823񎿎 > > > > Oh yeah, he doesn't care for Doepfer as well: > > > > The product lines matching most closely the alternative version of > > "best"? The beastly Serge and > > the vile Doepfer. Man, you can patch things out of those dreadful > > toads that would give you bad > > dreams for a week. > > > > Subject: Re: [AH] 2002 preview / MOTM > > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:19:49 -0500 > > > > (At least Doepfer offer a VC ADSR as well as > > other envelopes that actually work per expected > > envelope behaviour as exhibited over the last > > 30 or so years...) > > > > In my opinion, keep Doepfer exactly the way it is... > > That's all I have to say on this; it speaks for > > itself. Just please retain the voltage addressing > > of stages on the touch keyboard/sequencer :-D > > > > Easier, > > > > -Mike > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@y... > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/ terms/
Message
Re: touch keys
2002-07-23 by its_peake
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.