AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one. Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient. More is also welcomed ;-) I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even divisions. But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider! Ernst On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com>wrote: > > > hi Ernst, > > i totally agree that the Doepfer modular needs a pulse divider with uneven > (/3/5/7) divisions, for sure. > > > thanks, > Bakis. > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist > > [Doepfer_a100] group owner > > www. parallel - worlds - music. com > > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic > > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic > > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist > > www. DiN. org. uk > > www. musicamaximamagnetica. com > > www. vu-us. com > > www. shimarecords. co. uk > > --- On Sun, 2/14/10, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > > > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2 > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > Date: Sunday, February 14, 2010, 4:52 PM > > > > > Hello, > > I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock divisions. > > Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions? > > Or is this a strange and unpopular idea? > > greetz, > > Ernst > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2
2010-02-14 by achtung_999
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.