Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2010-02-14 by achtung_999
Hello, I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock divisions. Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions? Or is this a strange and unpopular idea? greetz, Ernst [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2010-02-14 by Bakis Sirros
hi Ernst, i totally agree that the Doepfer modular needs a pulse divider with uneven (/3/5/7) divisions, for sure. thanks, Bakis. Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org. uk www. musicamaximamagnetica. com www. vu-us. com www. shimarecords. co. uk --- On Sun, 2/14/10, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com> wrote:
From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com>
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 14, 2010, 4:52 PM
Hello,
I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock divisions.
Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions?
Or is this a strange and unpopular idea?
greetz,
Ernst
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]2010-02-14 by Florian Anwander
Hi Ernst > > I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock divisions. > Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions? > Or is this a strange and unpopular idea? definitely agreed. And I want also a binary down counter (opposed to the existing 160, which counts up). Florian
2010-02-14 by achtung_999
AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one. Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient. More is also welcomed ;-) I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even divisions. But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider! Ernst On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com>wrote: > > > hi Ernst, > > i totally agree that the Doepfer modular needs a pulse divider with uneven > (/3/5/7) divisions, for sure. > > > thanks, > Bakis. > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist > > [Doepfer_a100] group owner > > www. parallel - worlds - music. com > > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic > > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic > > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist > > www. DiN. org. uk > > www. musicamaximamagnetica. com > > www. vu-us. com > > www. shimarecords. co. uk > > --- On Sun, 2/14/10, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > > > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2 > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > Date: Sunday, February 14, 2010, 4:52 PM > > > > > Hello, > > I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock divisions. > > Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions? > > Or is this a strange and unpopular idea? > > greetz, > > Ernst > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2010-02-14 by james.husted@mac.com
It seems to me that this would not be a hard circuit to make. Clock a 4017 or equiv. and put a rotary switch connecting the 10 output steps to the reset. Take that signal and use it as an output. Then you can dial any division you want from 1:1 to 1/10th of the clock in. You won't have much control over the pulse width but some added circuitry may help there. -James
On Feb 14, 2010, at 2:25 PM, achtung_999 wrote: > AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one. > Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient. > More is also welcomed ;-) > I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even divisions. > But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider! > > Ernst > > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com>wrote: > >> >> >> hi Ernst, >> >> i totally agree that the Doepfer modular needs a pulse divider with uneven >> (/3/5/7) divisions, for sure. >> >> >> thanks, >> Bakis. >> >> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist >> >> [Doepfer_a100] group owner >> >> www. parallel - worlds - music. com >> >> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic >> >> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic >> >> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist >> >> www. DiN. org. uk >> >> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com >> >> www. vu-us. com >> >> www. shimarecords. co. uk >> >> --- On Sun, 2/14/10, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>> >> wrote: >> >> From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> >>> >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2 >> >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> >> Date: Sunday, February 14, 2010, 4:52 PM >> >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock divisions. >> >> Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions? >> >> Or is this a strange and unpopular idea? >> >> greetz, >> >> Ernst >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2010-02-14 by richyho@btopenworld.com
Um, hasn't this (or similar) already been done successfully by 4ms? --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote:
> > That sounds promising James.. thanks. > Maybe Dieter will like the idea ;-) > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, <james.husted@...> wrote: > > > > > > > It seems to me that this would not be a hard circuit to make. Clock a 4017 > > or equiv. and put a rotary switch connecting the 10 output steps to the > > reset. Take that signal and use it as an output. Then you can dial any > > division you want from 1:1 to 1/10th of the clock in. You won't have much > > control over the pulse width but some added circuitry may help there. > > -James > > > > > > On Feb 14, 2010, at 2:25 PM, achtung_999 wrote: > > > > > AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one. > > > Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient. > > > More is also welcomed ;-) > > > I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even divisions. > > > But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider! > > > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Bakis Sirros < > > synth_freak_2000@... <synth_freak_2000%40yahoo.com>>wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> hi Ernst, > > >> > > >> i totally agree that the Doepfer modular needs a pulse divider with > > uneven > > >> (/3/5/7) divisions, for sure. > > >> > > >> > > >> thanks, > > >> Bakis. > > >> > > >> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist > > >> > > >> [Doepfer_a100] group owner > > >> > > >> www. parallel - worlds - music. com > > >> > > >> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic > > >> > > >> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic > > >> > > >> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist > > >> > > >> www. DiN. org. uk > > >> > > >> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com > > >> > > >> www. vu-us. com > > >> > > >> www. shimarecords. co. uk > > >> > > >> --- On Sun, 2/14/10, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > > <heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > > <heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > > > > >>> > > >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2 > > >> > > >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100% > > 40yahoogroups.com> > > > > >> Date: Sunday, February 14, 2010, 4:52 PM > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock divisions. > > >> > > >> Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions? > > >> > > >> Or is this a strange and unpopular idea? > > >> > > >> greetz, > > >> > > >> Ernst > > >> > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >> > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2010-02-14 by achtung_999
That sounds promising James.. thanks. Maybe Dieter will like the idea ;-) On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, <james.husted@mac.com> wrote: > > > It seems to me that this would not be a hard circuit to make. Clock a 4017 > or equiv. and put a rotary switch connecting the 10 output steps to the > reset. Take that signal and use it as an output. Then you can dial any > division you want from 1:1 to 1/10th of the clock in. You won't have much > control over the pulse width but some added circuitry may help there. > -James > > > On Feb 14, 2010, at 2:25 PM, achtung_999 wrote: > > > AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one. > > Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient. > > More is also welcomed ;-) > > I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even divisions. > > But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider! > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Bakis Sirros < > synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com <synth_freak_2000%40yahoo.com>>wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> hi Ernst, > >> > >> i totally agree that the Doepfer modular needs a pulse divider with > uneven > >> (/3/5/7) divisions, for sure. > >> > >> > >> thanks, > >> Bakis. > >> > >> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist > >> > >> [Doepfer_a100] group owner > >> > >> www. parallel - worlds - music. com > >> > >> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic > >> > >> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic > >> > >> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist > >> > >> www. DiN. org. uk > >> > >> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com > >> > >> www. vu-us. com > >> > >> www. shimarecords. co. uk > >> > >> --- On Sun, 2/14/10, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > <heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>> > >> wrote: > >> > >> From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > <heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > > >>> > >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2 > >> > >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100% > 40yahoogroups.com> > > >> Date: Sunday, February 14, 2010, 4:52 PM > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock divisions. > >> > >> Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions? > >> > >> Or is this a strange and unpopular idea? > >> > >> greetz, > >> > >> Ernst > >> > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2010-02-15 by Florian Anwander
Hello The A161 is the addon module which is intended to achieve this (the 161 contains a 4017!) But setting the 161 to uneven would cause the even dividers of the A160 to reset on uneven values. What I want is a module which sends parallel even and uneven divider ratios (1/2/3/4/5/6/8/9). You can do this with 8 4017, but it should be easier with a single PIC. Florian achtung_999 wrote:
> That sounds promising James.. thanks. > Maybe Dieter will like the idea ;-) > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, <james.husted@mac.com> wrote: > > >> >>It seems to me that this would not be a hard circuit to make. Clock a 4017 >>or equiv. and put a rotary switch connecting the 10 output steps to the >>reset. Take that signal and use it as an output. Then you can dial any >>division you want from 1:1 to 1/10th of the clock in. You won't have much >>control over the pulse width but some added circuitry may help there. >>-James >> >> >>On Feb 14, 2010, at 2:25 PM, achtung_999 wrote: >> >> >>>AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one. >>>Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient. >>>More is also welcomed ;-) >>>I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even divisions. >>>But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider! >>> >>>Ernst >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Bakis Sirros < >> >>synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com <synth_freak_2000%40yahoo.com>>wrote: >> >>>> >>>>hi Ernst, >>>> >>>>i totally agree that the Doepfer modular needs a pulse divider with >> >>uneven >> >>>>(/3/5/7) divisions, for sure. >>>> >>>> >>>>thanks, >>>>Bakis. >>>> >>>>Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist >>>> >>>>[Doepfer_a100] group owner >>>> >>>>www. parallel - worlds - music. com >>>> >>>>www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic >>>> >>>>www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic >>>> >>>>www. myspace. com/ memorygeist >>>> >>>>www. DiN. org. uk >>>> >>>>www. musicamaximamagnetica. com >>>> >>>>www. vu-us. com >>>> >>>>www. shimarecords. co. uk >>>> >>>>--- On Sun, 2/14/10, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> >> >><heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>> >> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> >> >><heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> >> >>>>Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2 >>>> >>>>To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100% >> >>40yahoogroups.com> >> >>>>Date: Sunday, February 14, 2010, 4:52 PM >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Hello, >>>> >>>>I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock divisions. >>>> >>>>Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions? >>>> >>>>Or is this a strange and unpopular idea? >>>> >>>>greetz, >>>> >>>>Ernst >>>> >>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>>> >>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>> >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------ >>> >>>Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
2010-02-15 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one. > Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient. > More is also welcomed ;-) > I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even divisions. > But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider! > > Ernst It's nothing but a fast microcontroller (e.g. a PIC). Most of the board will be the in/output stuff (buffers, voltage shifters, protection circuits, LED display required for each in/output). If there are sufficient inquiries: no problem for us. Sounds like a one day job for Christian an me. I'd suggest a poll for the A-160-2. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer
2010-02-15 by Bakis Sirros
ok, i'll make a poll. but should i suggest a module with only uneven divisions(/3/5/7/9), or with both even and uneven (/1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8) ? my opinion is that one module with both even and uneven divisions would be better (as Florian suggested)! let me know Dieter. thanks, Bakis. Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org. uk www. musicamaximamagnetica. com www. vu-us. com www. shimarecords. co. uk --- On Mon, 2/15/10, yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de> wrote:
From: yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de>
Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, February 15, 2010, 11:25 AM
> AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one.
> Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient.
> More is also welcomed ;-)
> I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even divisions.
> But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider!
>
> Ernst
It's nothing but a fast microcontroller (e.g. a PIC). Most of the board will
be the in/output stuff (buffers, voltage shifters, protection circuits, LED
display required for each in/output). If there are sufficient inquiries: no
problem for us. Sounds like a one day job for Christian an me. I'd suggest a
poll for the A-160-2.
Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]2010-02-15 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> ok, i'll make a poll. > > but should i suggest a module with only uneven > divisions(/3/5/7/9), or with both even and uneven (/1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8) ? > > my opinion is that one module with both even and uneven divisions > would be better (as Florian suggested)! > > let me know Dieter. > > thanks, > Bakis. It depends upon the users. If we use a PIC we can make all divisions you want: e.g. 3/5/6/7/9/10 ... (i.e. all not available from A-160) or 3/5/7/9/11... (i.e. all uneven) oder 2/3/4/5/6/7.... You should include in the poll different versions of divisions. Best wishes Dieter
2010-02-15 by achtung_999
Hello, I had never heard of 4ms, started searching the web and found this: http://4mspedals.com/rcd.php This is not the same idea. It is more elaborate. Very interesting module. But @ $179 quite pricey. And it does a lot more than what I was thinking of. I am all for the poll! Greetz Ernst On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:57 AM, richyho@btopenworld.com < richyho@btopenworld.com> wrote: > > > Um, hasn't this (or similar) already been done successfully by 4ms? > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>, > achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote: > > > > That sounds promising James.. thanks. > > Maybe Dieter will like the idea ;-) > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, <james.husted@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that this would not be a hard circuit to make. Clock a > 4017 > > > or equiv. and put a rotary switch connecting the 10 output steps to the > > > reset. Take that signal and use it as an output. Then you can dial any > > > division you want from 1:1 to 1/10th of the clock in. You won't have > much > > > control over the pulse width but some added circuitry may help there. > > > -James > > > > > > > > > On Feb 14, 2010, at 2:25 PM, achtung_999 wrote: > > > > > > > AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one. > > > > Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient. > > > > More is also welcomed ;-) > > > > I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even > divisions. > > > > But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider! > > > > > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Bakis Sirros < > > > synth_freak_2000@... <synth_freak_2000%40yahoo.com>>wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> hi Ernst, > > > >> > > > >> i totally agree that the Doepfer modular needs a pulse divider with > > > uneven > > > >> (/3/5/7) divisions, for sure. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> thanks, > > > >> Bakis. > > > >> > > > >> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist > > > >> > > > >> [Doepfer_a100] group owner > > > >> > > > >> www. parallel - worlds - music. com > > > >> > > > >> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic > > > >> > > > >> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic > > > >> > > > >> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist > > > >> > > > >> www. DiN. org. uk > > > >> > > > >> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com > > > >> > > > >> www. vu-us. com > > > >> > > > >> www. shimarecords. co. uk > > > >> > > > >> --- On Sun, 2/14/10, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@ > ...<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > > > > <heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...<heinrich.himmelwasser% > 40gmail.com> > > > > <heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2 > > > >> > > > >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100% > 40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100% > > > > 40yahoogroups.com> > > > > > > >> Date: Sunday, February 14, 2010, 4:52 PM > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Hello, > > > >> > > > >> I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock > divisions. > > > >> > > > >> Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions? > > > >> > > > >> Or is this a strange and unpopular idea? > > > >> > > > >> greetz, > > > >> > > > >> Ernst > > > >> > > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >> > > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2010-02-15 by ysinollaysi
The lack of the uneven divisions is the main reason that I don't have 160/161 combo. I _will_ buy A-160-2 (and 160 of course) if it's reasonably priced as I believe it will be. - t/A/M --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <yahoo@...> wrote:
> > > AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one. > > Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient. > > More is also welcomed ;-) > > I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even divisions. > > But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider! > > > > Ernst > > It's nothing but a fast microcontroller (e.g. a PIC). Most of the board will > be the in/output stuff (buffers, voltage shifters, protection circuits, LED > display required for each in/output). If there are sufficient inquiries: no > problem for us. Sounds like a one day job for Christian an me. I'd suggest a > poll for the A-160-2. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer >
2010-02-15 by Bakis Sirros
ok, i'll include two different versions of dividers in the poll: one with all divisions /2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9 (8 outputs), one with only odd (plus the /6 division that is not available in the a160) divisions /3/5/6/7/9/11/13/15 (8 outputs again). i'll create the poll in a few hours. thanks, Bakis. Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org. uk www. musicamaximamagnetica. com www. vu-us. com www. shimarecords. co. uk --- On Mon, 2/15/10, yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de> wrote:
From: yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de>
Subject: AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, February 15, 2010, 1:17 PM
> ok, i'll make a poll.
>
> but should i suggest a module with only uneven
> divisions(/3/ 5/7/9), or with both even and uneven (/1/2/3/4/5/ 6/7/8) ?
>
> my opinion is that one module with both even and uneven divisions
> would be better (as Florian suggested)!
>
> let me know Dieter.
>
> thanks,
> Bakis.
It depends upon the users. If we use a PIC we can make all divisions you want: e.g. 3/5/6/7/9/10 ... (i.e. all not available from A-160) or 3/5/7/9/11.. . (i.e. all uneven) oder 2/3/4/5/6/7. ... You should include in the poll different versions of divisions.
Best wishes
Dieter
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]2010-02-16 by gothicpunk82
Howdy, I've been lurking around for a while and decided to partake in the discussion. This is something I was wondering about the proposed A-160-2. If this is made, will it work like a 160/161 combo? So like a 160-2/161 combo? I currently do not have the 160/161, however, plan on purchasing one in the near future, but is there the possibility to have these daisy chain in a manor such that you could have a 160/160-2/161. I figure that the current modules have their single link between each other and would require rework to account for another module, but perhaps the 160-2, aside from being stand alone, could possibly connect together? I'm not sure if I am explaining this well enough, so let me try an example. The 160 has clock in and reset, the 160-2 would also have clock an reset. Could there be a way to link the two together to essentially normal the clock in and resets so you could use them together? That way the internal connection from the 160 to 161 could go from the 160 to 160-2 to 161. If someone were to wish for only odd clock division, the 160-2 could stand alone with or without the 160 or 161. If this were the case, there would be no need for a module that did all clock divisions since half of them are already available. It would seem silly to remake what already exists for this purpose. Anyhow, I was just curious. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ysinollaysi" <ysinollaysi@...> wrote:
> > The lack of the uneven divisions is the main reason that I don't have 160/161 combo. I _will_ buy A-160-2 (and 160 of course) if it's reasonably priced as I believe it will be. > > - t/A/M >
2010-02-16 by david.salter@thomsonreuters.com
A good question Gothicpunk. Do I need a second 161 to go with the proposed 160-2 or can I daisy chain off my existing 161 and have the even divisions on the 160 and odd on 160-2? David * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David Salter Senior Consultant SSG UKI Thomson Reuters O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402 M 07990562402 david.salter@thomsonreuters.com thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail ________________________________
From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of gothicpunk82 Sent: 16 February 2010 14:26 To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Proposition for a module A160-2 Howdy, I've been lurking around for a while and decided to partake in the discussion. This is something I was wondering about the proposed A-160-2. If this is made, will it work like a 160/161 combo? So like a 160-2/161 combo? I currently do not have the 160/161, however, plan on purchasing one in the near future, but is there the possibility to have these daisy chain in a manor such that you could have a 160/160-2/161. I figure that the current modules have their single link between each other and would require rework to account for another module, but perhaps the 160-2, aside from being stand alone, could possibly connect together? I'm not sure if I am explaining this well enough, so let me try an example. The 160 has clock in and reset, the 160-2 would also have clock an reset. Could there be a way to link the two together to essentially normal the clock in and resets so you could use them together? That way the internal connection from the 160 to 161 could go from the 160 to 160-2 to 161. If someone were to wish for only odd clock division, the 160-2 could stand alone with or without the 160 or 161. If this were the case, there would be no need for a module that did all clock divisions since half of them are already available. It would seem silly to remake what already exists for this purpose. Anyhow, I was just curious. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> , "ysinollaysi" <ysinollaysi@...> wrote: > > The lack of the uneven divisions is the main reason that I don't have 160/161 combo. I _will_ buy A-160-2 (and 160 of course) if it's reasonably priced as I believe it will be. > > - t/A/M > This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2010-02-16 by achtung_999
I was waiting for this to pop up when I put out the proposition.. I personally think that it would be fun if it could hook up to the A161 like the original A160. Although it would, for me at least, not be a great thing if it would be omitted... On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:41 PM, <david.salter@thomsonreuters.com> wrote: > > > A good question Gothicpunk. > > Do I need a second 161 to go with the proposed 160-2 or can I daisy > chain off my existing 161 and have the even divisions on the 160 and odd > on 160-2? > > David > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > * * * > David Salter > Senior Consultant > SSG UKI > > Thomson Reuters > > O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402 > M 07990562402 > > david.salter@thomsonreuters.com <david.salter%40thomsonreuters.com> > thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/> > > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > > ________________________________ > > From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>[mailto: > Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>] > On Behalf Of gothicpunk82 > Sent: 16 February 2010 14:26 > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Proposition for a module A160-2 > > > Howdy, I've been lurking around for a while and decided to partake in > the discussion. > > This is something I was wondering about the proposed A-160-2. If this is > made, will it work like a 160/161 combo? So like a 160-2/161 combo? I > currently do not have the 160/161, however, plan on purchasing one in > the near future, but is there the possibility to have these daisy chain > in a manor such that you could have a 160/160-2/161. I figure that the > current modules have their single link between each other and would > require rework to account for another module, but perhaps the 160-2, > aside from being stand alone, could possibly connect together? > > I'm not sure if I am explaining this well enough, so let me try an > example. The 160 has clock in and reset, the 160-2 would also have clock > an reset. Could there be a way to link the two together to essentially > normal the clock in and resets so you could use them together? That way > the internal connection from the 160 to 161 could go from the 160 to > 160-2 to 161. If someone were to wish for only odd clock division, the > 160-2 could stand alone with or without the 160 or 161. > > If this were the case, there would be no need for a module that did all > clock divisions since half of them are already available. It would seem > silly to remake what already exists for this purpose. > > Anyhow, I was just curious. > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%2540yahoogroups.com>> > , "ysinollaysi" > > <ysinollaysi@...> wrote: > > > > The lack of the uneven divisions is the main reason that I don't have > 160/161 combo. I _will_ buy A-160-2 (and 160 of course) if it's > reasonably priced as I believe it will be. > > > > - t/A/M > > > > This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and > information company. > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, > except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson > Reuters. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2010-02-16 by Bakis Sirros
what would be the benefit of this connection other than saving two patchcables (meaning the normaling of clocks and resets inputs of a160 and 160-2)? i do not see any major benefit from this feature... Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org. uk www. musicamaximamagnetica. com www. vu-us. com www. shimarecords. co. uk --- On Tue, 2/16/10, gothicpunk82 <gothicpunk82@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: gothicpunk82 <gothicpunk82@yahoo.com>
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Proposition for a module A160-2
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 4:25 PM
Howdy, I've been lurking around for a while and decided to partake in the discussion.
This is something I was wondering about the proposed A-160-2. If this is made, will it work like a 160/161 combo? So like a 160-2/161 combo? I currently do not have the 160/161, however, plan on purchasing one in the near future, but is there the possibility to have these daisy chain in a manor such that you could have a 160/160-2/161. I figure that the current modules have their single link between each other and would require rework to account for another module, but perhaps the 160-2, aside from being stand alone, could possibly connect together?
I'm not sure if I am explaining this well enough, so let me try an example. The 160 has clock in and reset, the 160-2 would also have clock an reset. Could there be a way to link the two together to essentially normal the clock in and resets so you could use them together? That way the internal connection from the 160 to 161 could go from the 160 to 160-2 to 161. If someone were to wish for only odd clock division, the 160-2 could stand alone with or without the 160 or 161.
If this were the case, there would be no need for a module that did all clock divisions since half of them are already available. It would seem silly to remake what already exists for this purpose.
Anyhow, I was just curious.
--- In Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com, "ysinollaysi" <ysinollaysi@ ...> wrote:
>
> The lack of the uneven divisions is the main reason that I don't have 160/161 combo. I _will_ buy A-160-2 (and 160 of course) if it's reasonably priced as I believe it will be.
>
> - t/A/M
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]2010-02-16 by achtung_999
> i do not see any major benefit from this feature... > > Well that you could choose to use the A161 in combination with either the A160 or the A160-2. Meaning that that people would not be obliged to buy the A160 if they only want the A160-2 and the A161. That could be a selling point Bakis! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2010-02-16 by Bakis Sirros
yes, ok, you are right about this. but, who would want Only the a160-2 in his modular (especially if it does Only odd divisions)? most users would want the a160 and a160-2 in their systems. (unless the a160-2 will be manufactured to make both even and odd divisions...) so, i guess the connection capability between the a161 and a160-2 would have real meaning only if the version of a160-2 with both EVEN and ODD divisions would be finally manufactured... anyway, Dieter will decide... Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org. uk www. musicamaximamagnetica. com www. vu-us. com www. shimarecords. co. uk --- On Tue, 2/16/10, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com> wrote:
From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Proposition for a module A160-2
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 10:50 PM
> i do not see any major benefit from this feature...
>
>
Well that you could choose to use the A161 in combination with either the
A160 or the A160-2. Meaning that that people would not be obliged to buy the
A160 if they only want the A160-2 and the A161.
That could be a selling point Bakis!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]