Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

New poll for Doepfer_a100

New poll for Doepfer_a100

2010-02-15 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

Enter your vote today!  A new poll has been created for the 
Doepfer_a100 group:

Would you buy the Doepfer A160-2 divider module with Uneven (Odd) clock divisions? 

  o Yes, and i would prefer the one with all divisions /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 (8 outputs) 
  o Yes, and i would prefer the one with only odd (plus the /6 division) divisions /3 /5 /6 /7 /9 /11 /13 /15 (8 outputs) 
  o maybe.... 
  o No, not interested. 


To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?id=12987688 

Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are 
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups 
web site listed above.

Thanks!

Re: New poll for Doepfer_a100

2010-02-16 by spiralsect

I'd be interested in this but only if the sockets were sensibly spaced (The 4ms RCD sockets are way too close together in my opinion which is a shame as it's a very cool module). I know everybody wants modules to as small as possible but I think this one could benefit from being 8HP rather than 4. This would allow for a clock input, reset input, division rate select switch and 8 outputs.

I like the idea of switch-able division rates.

Dieter, would an 8HP panel cost much more than a 4HP one?

Cheers,
Adam-V

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: New poll for Doepfer_a100

2010-02-17 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> Dieter, would an 8HP panel cost much more than a 4HP one?

Yes, but not twice as much because the silk screen charges are nearly the
same for 4 and 8 HP panels. But the material and milling/stamping charges
are twice as much. Altogether I think an 8 HP panel would about 50% more
expensive than a 4 HP panel.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.