ok, i'll make a poll.
but should i suggest a module with only uneven divisions(/3/5/7/9), or with both even and uneven (/1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8) ?
my opinion is that one module with both even and uneven divisions would be better (as Florian suggested)!
let me know Dieter.
thanks,
Bakis.
Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
www. parallel - worlds - music. com
www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
www. DiN. org. uk
www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
www. vu-us. com
www. shimarecords. co. uk
--- On Mon, 2/15/10, yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de> wrote:
From: yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de>
Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, February 15, 2010, 11:25 AM
> AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one.
> Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient.
> More is also welcomed ;-)
> I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even divisions.
> But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider!
>
> Ernst
It's nothing but a fast microcontroller (e.g. a PIC). Most of the board will
be the in/output stuff (buffers, voltage shifters, protection circuits, LED
display required for each in/output). If there are sufficient inquiries: no
problem for us. Sounds like a one day job for Christian an me. I'd suggest a
poll for the A-160-2.
Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2
2010-02-15 by Bakis Sirros
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.