Doepfer

I was waiting for this to pop up when I put out the proposition..
I personally think that it would be fun if it could hook up to the A161 like
the original A160.
Although it would, for me at least, not be a great thing if it would be
omitted...



On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:41 PM, <david.salter@thomsonreuters.com> wrote:

>
>
> A good question Gothicpunk.
>
> Do I need a second 161 to go with the proposed 160-2 or can I daisy
> chain off my existing 161 and have the even divisions on the 160 and odd
> on 160-2?
>
> David
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * * *
> David Salter
> Senior Consultant
> SSG UKI
>
> Thomson Reuters
>
> O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402
> M 07990562402
>
> david.salter@thomsonreuters.com <david.salter%40thomsonreuters.com>
> thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/>
>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>[mailto:
> Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>]
> On Behalf Of gothicpunk82
> Sent: 16 February 2010 14:26
>
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Proposition for a module A160-2
>
>
> Howdy, I've been lurking around for a while and decided to partake in
> the discussion.
>
> This is something I was wondering about the proposed A-160-2. If this is
> made, will it work like a 160/161 combo? So like a 160-2/161 combo? I
> currently do not have the 160/161, however, plan on purchasing one in
> the near future, but is there the possibility to have these daisy chain
> in a manor such that you could have a 160/160-2/161. I figure that the
> current modules have their single link between each other and would
> require rework to account for another module, but perhaps the 160-2,
> aside from being stand alone, could possibly connect together?
>
> I'm not sure if I am explaining this well enough, so let me try an
> example. The 160 has clock in and reset, the 160-2 would also have clock
> an reset. Could there be a way to link the two together to essentially
> normal the clock in and resets so you could use them together? That way
> the internal connection from the 160 to 161 could go from the 160 to
> 160-2 to 161. If someone were to wish for only odd clock division, the
> 160-2 could stand alone with or without the 160 or 161.
>
> If this were the case, there would be no need for a module that did all
> clock divisions since half of them are already available. It would seem
> silly to remake what already exists for this purpose.
>
> Anyhow, I was just curious.
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%2540yahoogroups.com>>
> , "ysinollaysi"
>
> <ysinollaysi@...> wrote:
> >
> > The lack of the uneven divisions is the main reason that I don't have
> 160/161 combo. I _will_ buy A-160-2 (and 160 of course) if it's
> reasonably priced as I believe it will be.
> >
> > - t/A/M
> >
>
> This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and
> information company.
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
> except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson
> Reuters.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]