Doepfer

A good question Gothicpunk.
 
Do I need a second 161 to go with the proposed 160-2 or can I daisy
chain off my existing 161 and have the even divisions on the 160 and odd
on 160-2?
 
David
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * *
David Salter
Senior Consultant
SSG UKI

Thomson Reuters

O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402
M 07990562402

david.salter@thomsonreuters.com
thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/> 
 
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

 

________________________________

From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of gothicpunk82
Sent: 16 February 2010 14:26
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Proposition for a module A160-2


  

Howdy, I've been lurking around for a while and decided to partake in
the discussion.

This is something I was wondering about the proposed A-160-2. If this is
made, will it work like a 160/161 combo? So like a 160-2/161 combo? I
currently do not have the 160/161, however, plan on purchasing one in
the near future, but is there the possibility to have these daisy chain
in a manor such that you could have a 160/160-2/161. I figure that the
current modules have their single link between each other and would
require rework to account for another module, but perhaps the 160-2,
aside from being stand alone, could possibly connect together? 

I'm not sure if I am explaining this well enough, so let me try an
example. The 160 has clock in and reset, the 160-2 would also have clock
an reset. Could there be a way to link the two together to essentially
normal the clock in and resets so you could use them together? That way
the internal connection from the 160 to 161 could go from the 160 to
160-2 to 161. If someone were to wish for only odd clock division, the
160-2 could stand alone with or without the 160 or 161.

If this were the case, there would be no need for a module that did all
clock divisions since half of them are already available. It would seem
silly to remake what already exists for this purpose. 

Anyhow, I was just curious.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> , "ysinollaysi"
<ysinollaysi@...> wrote:
>
> The lack of the uneven divisions is the main reason that I don't have
160/161 combo. I _will_ buy A-160-2 (and 160 of course) if it's
reasonably priced as I believe it will be.
> 
> - t/A/M
> 






This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]