Hello, I had never heard of 4ms, started searching the web and found this: http://4mspedals.com/rcd.php This is not the same idea. It is more elaborate. Very interesting module. But @ $179 quite pricey. And it does a lot more than what I was thinking of. I am all for the poll! Greetz Ernst On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:57 AM, richyho@btopenworld.com < richyho@btopenworld.com> wrote: > > > Um, hasn't this (or similar) already been done successfully by 4ms? > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>, > achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote: > > > > That sounds promising James.. thanks. > > Maybe Dieter will like the idea ;-) > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, <james.husted@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that this would not be a hard circuit to make. Clock a > 4017 > > > or equiv. and put a rotary switch connecting the 10 output steps to the > > > reset. Take that signal and use it as an output. Then you can dial any > > > division you want from 1:1 to 1/10th of the clock in. You won't have > much > > > control over the pulse width but some added circuitry may help there. > > > -James > > > > > > > > > On Feb 14, 2010, at 2:25 PM, achtung_999 wrote: > > > > > > > AH okay nice to know I'm not the only one. > > > > Maybe 3/5/7/9 is already sufficient. > > > > More is also welcomed ;-) > > > > I know that it is a bit more of a hassle to do than the even > divisions. > > > > But I would be very happy to spend my money on an uneven divider! > > > > > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Bakis Sirros < > > > synth_freak_2000@... <synth_freak_2000%40yahoo.com>>wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> hi Ernst, > > > >> > > > >> i totally agree that the Doepfer modular needs a pulse divider with > > > uneven > > > >> (/3/5/7) divisions, for sure. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> thanks, > > > >> Bakis. > > > >> > > > >> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist > > > >> > > > >> [Doepfer_a100] group owner > > > >> > > > >> www. parallel - worlds - music. com > > > >> > > > >> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic > > > >> > > > >> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic > > > >> > > > >> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist > > > >> > > > >> www. DiN. org. uk > > > >> > > > >> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com > > > >> > > > >> www. vu-us. com > > > >> > > > >> www. shimarecords. co. uk > > > >> > > > >> --- On Sun, 2/14/10, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@ > ...<heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > > > > <heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...<heinrich.himmelwasser% > 40gmail.com> > > > > <heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com> > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Proposition for a module A160-2 > > > >> > > > >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100% > 40yahoogroups.com><Doepfer_a100% > > > > 40yahoogroups.com> > > > > > > >> Date: Sunday, February 14, 2010, 4:52 PM > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Hello, > > > >> > > > >> I find myself using the A163 VC Divider to do uneven clock > divisions. > > > >> > > > >> Isn't it time to get an A160-2 that does the uneven divisions? > > > >> > > > >> Or is this a strange and unpopular idea? > > > >> > > > >> greetz, > > > >> > > > >> Ernst > > > >> > > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >> > > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Proposition for a module A160-2
2010-02-15 by achtung_999
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.