Three way panel selector would be very cool. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David Salter Senior Consultant SSG UKI Thomson Reuters O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402 M 07990562402 david.salter@thomsonreuters.com thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail ________________________________ From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yahoo@doepfer.de Sent: 16 February 2010 09:50 To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A160-2 poll > We could develop a version with different sets of dividing factors, e.g. > linear 2/3/4/5/6..., 3/5/6/7/9/10 (only the factors not available > at A-160), > 3/5/7/9/11... (only odd factors), 3/5/7/11/13... (only prime > numbers) and so > on. The set could be chosen e.g. by internal jumpers or a three-position > toggle switch. This option would increase only a little bit. But the main > problem is the front panel printing. It's not possible to built a separate > front panel for each version (the front panel will be probably the most > expensive part of the module). The only idea is a blank panel and we add > self-adhesive stickers for all versions. But such a panel would look a bit > poor (like the prototypes). > > Just an idea ... > > Dieter Doepfer Sorry. It should read "This option would increase only a little bit the price" Dieter This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Doepfer_a100] A160-2 poll
2010-02-16 by david.salter@thomsonreuters.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.