Doepfer

And what about Fibonacci?

1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 etc
Robbert
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:16 AM, <david.salter@thomsonreuters.com> wrote:

>
>
> Three way panel selector would be very cool.
>
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * * *
> David Salter
> Senior Consultant
> SSG UKI
>
> Thomson Reuters
>
> O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402
> M 07990562402
>
> david.salter@thomsonreuters.com <david.salter%40thomsonreuters.com>
> thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/>
>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>[mailto:
> Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>]
> On Behalf Of yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo%40doepfer.de>
> Sent: 16 February 2010 09:50
>
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A160-2 poll
>
>
> > We could develop a version with different sets of dividing factors,
> e.g.
> > linear 2/3/4/5/6..., 3/5/6/7/9/10 (only the factors not available
> > at A-160),
> > 3/5/7/9/11... (only odd factors), 3/5/7/11/13... (only prime
> > numbers) and so
> > on. The set could be chosen e.g. by internal jumpers or a
> three-position
> > toggle switch. This option would increase only a little bit. But the
> main
> > problem is the front panel printing. It's not possible to built a
> separate
> > front panel for each version (the front panel will be probably the
> most
> > expensive part of the module). The only idea is a blank panel and we
> add
> > self-adhesive stickers for all versions. But such a panel would look a
> bit
> > poor (like the prototypes).
> >
> > Just an idea ...
> >
> > Dieter Doepfer
>
> Sorry. It should read "This option would increase only a little bit the
> price"
>
> Dieter
>
> This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and
> information company.
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
> except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson
> Reuters.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]