Well, I am not sold on the 8-bit idea. Sure it can be fun to have a sample degraded to 8bits, but I really think that 16 bit 44khz is a reasonable standard for sound. Otherwise the a-112 seems like a good module. ----- Original Message ----- From: "jmaddocks1975" <jmaddocks1975@yahoo.co.uk> To: <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:46 PM Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: If anyone cares about graphic VCOs or DCOs > What about doepfer's own A-112 sampler module, isn't this digital > and still cheap? > > Perhaps people who are interested in a DCO should look at this > module first, very powerful module and worth its money! > Also, its a Wavetable VCO with voltage controllable Pitch as > Analogue Solutions. > > John. > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "Paul Schulz" <dasfonk@w...> wrote: > > Andreas wrote: > > >To sum things up he thinks a DCO with vc control will be very > expensive (more than an a111) > > > > That´s ridiculous in my eyes. How did Analogue Soultions manage to > build a Wavetable VCO with voltage controllable Pitch, Wave and Bank > for just £93 ???? That IS cheaper than a A-111 indeed, although it´s > a powerful VC-digital module as the DCO would be. > > > > best, > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: If anyone cares about graphic VCOs or DCOs
2002-08-01 by Andreas Lindholm
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.