Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for Doepfer_a100

2010-03-16 by Bakis Sirros

yes, that would be great.



Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist

[Doepfer_a100] group owner

www. parallel - worlds - music. com

www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic

www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic

www. myspace. com/ memorygeist

www. DiN. org. uk

www. musicamaximamagnetica. com

www. vu-us. com

--- On Tue, 3/16/10, yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de> wrote:

From: yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de>
Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for Doepfer_a100
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 11:34 AM







 



  


    
      
      
      > The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed.  Here are the

> final results:

>

>

> POLL QUESTION: Would you buy the Doepfer A160-2 divider module

> with Uneven (Odd) clock divisions?

>

> CHOICES AND RESULTS

> - Yes, and i would prefer the one with all divisions /2 /3 /4 /5

> /6 /7 /8 /9 (8 outputs), 13 votes, 26.00%

> - Yes, and i would prefer the one with only odd (plus the /6

> division) divisions /3 /5 /6 /7 /9 /11 /13 /15 (8 outputs), 21

> votes, 42.00%

> - maybe...., 9 votes, 18.00%

> - No, not interested., 7 votes, 14.00%



Dear Members,



thank you for the poll. I think we will manufacture a version with a

three-position toggle switch than can be used to define the division set,

i.e. three division sets will be available. All we (or better said: you)

have to do is to decide which three division sets are available :-)

As it's not a very challenging design (rather a routine piece of work) I

think it could be realized soon. We will built a prototype and then ask for

the desired dividing factor sets.



Best wishes

Dieter Doepfer





    
     

    
    


 



  






      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.