Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

Poll results for Doepfer_a100

Poll results for Doepfer_a100

2010-03-16 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed.  Here are the 
final results: 


POLL QUESTION: Would you buy the Doepfer A160-2 divider module with Uneven (Odd) clock divisions? 

CHOICES AND RESULTS
- Yes, and i would prefer the one with all divisions /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 (8 outputs), 13 votes, 26.00%  
- Yes, and i would prefer the one with only odd (plus the /6 division) divisions /3 /5 /6 /7 /9 /11 /13 /15 (8 outputs), 21 votes, 42.00%  
- maybe...., 9 votes, 18.00%  
- No, not interested., 7 votes, 14.00%  



For more information about this group, please visit 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100 

For help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/forms/general.html

Re: Poll results for Doepfer_a100

2010-03-16 by peter.erikson

Super! A solution that will please everyone!

I am really looking forward to this module!

//Peter


--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <yahoo@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> > The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed.  Here are the
> > final results:
> >
> >
> > POLL QUESTION: Would you buy the Doepfer A160-2 divider module
> > with Uneven (Odd) clock divisions?
> >
> > CHOICES AND RESULTS
> > - Yes, and i would prefer the one with all divisions /2 /3 /4 /5
> > /6 /7 /8 /9 (8 outputs), 13 votes, 26.00%
> > - Yes, and i would prefer the one with only odd (plus the /6
> > division) divisions /3 /5 /6 /7 /9 /11 /13 /15 (8 outputs), 21
> > votes, 42.00%
> > - maybe...., 9 votes, 18.00%
> > - No, not interested., 7 votes, 14.00%
> 
> Dear Members,
> 
> thank you for the poll. I think we will manufacture a version with a
> three-position toggle switch than can be used to define the division set,
> i.e. three division sets will be available. All we (or better said: you)
> have to do is to decide which three division sets are available :-)
> As it's not a very challenging design (rather a routine piece of work) I
> think it could be realized soon. We will built a prototype and then ask for
> the desired dividing factor sets.
> 
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for Doepfer_a100

2010-03-16 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed.  Here are the
> final results:
>
>
> POLL QUESTION: Would you buy the Doepfer A160-2 divider module
> with Uneven (Odd) clock divisions?
>
> CHOICES AND RESULTS
> - Yes, and i would prefer the one with all divisions /2 /3 /4 /5
> /6 /7 /8 /9 (8 outputs), 13 votes, 26.00%
> - Yes, and i would prefer the one with only odd (plus the /6
> division) divisions /3 /5 /6 /7 /9 /11 /13 /15 (8 outputs), 21
> votes, 42.00%
> - maybe...., 9 votes, 18.00%
> - No, not interested., 7 votes, 14.00%

Dear Members,

thank you for the poll. I think we will manufacture a version with a
three-position toggle switch than can be used to define the division set,
i.e. three division sets will be available. All we (or better said: you)
have to do is to decide which three division sets are available :-)
As it's not a very challenging design (rather a routine piece of work) I
think it could be realized soon. We will built a prototype and then ask for
the desired dividing factor sets.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer

RE: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for Doepfer_a100

2010-03-16 by david.salter@thomsonreuters.com

That's great Dieter, this will be a very useful module.
 
David
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * *
David Salter
Senior Consultant
SSG UKI

Thomson Reuters

O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402
M 07990562402

david.salter@thomsonreuters.com
thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/> 
 
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

 

________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of yahoo@doepfer.de
Sent: 16 March 2010 09:35
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for Doepfer_a100


  

> The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the
> final results:
>
>
> POLL QUESTION: Would you buy the Doepfer A160-2 divider module
> with Uneven (Odd) clock divisions?
>
> CHOICES AND RESULTS
> - Yes, and i would prefer the one with all divisions /2 /3 /4 /5
> /6 /7 /8 /9 (8 outputs), 13 votes, 26.00%
> - Yes, and i would prefer the one with only odd (plus the /6
> division) divisions /3 /5 /6 /7 /9 /11 /13 /15 (8 outputs), 21
> votes, 42.00%
> - maybe...., 9 votes, 18.00%
> - No, not interested., 7 votes, 14.00%

Dear Members,

thank you for the poll. I think we will manufacture a version with a
three-position toggle switch than can be used to define the division
set,
i.e. three division sets will be available. All we (or better said: you)
have to do is to decide which three division sets are available :-)
As it's not a very challenging design (rather a routine piece of work) I
think it could be realized soon. We will built a prototype and then ask
for
the desired dividing factor sets.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer






This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for Doepfer_a100

2010-03-16 by Bakis Sirros

yes, that would be great.



Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist

[Doepfer_a100] group owner

www. parallel - worlds - music. com

www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic

www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic

www. myspace. com/ memorygeist

www. DiN. org. uk

www. musicamaximamagnetica. com

www. vu-us. com

--- On Tue, 3/16/10, yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo@doepfer.de>
Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for Doepfer_a100
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 11:34 AM







 



  


    
      
      
      > The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed.  Here are the

> final results:

>

>

> POLL QUESTION: Would you buy the Doepfer A160-2 divider module

> with Uneven (Odd) clock divisions?

>

> CHOICES AND RESULTS

> - Yes, and i would prefer the one with all divisions /2 /3 /4 /5

> /6 /7 /8 /9 (8 outputs), 13 votes, 26.00%

> - Yes, and i would prefer the one with only odd (plus the /6

> division) divisions /3 /5 /6 /7 /9 /11 /13 /15 (8 outputs), 21

> votes, 42.00%

> - maybe...., 9 votes, 18.00%

> - No, not interested., 7 votes, 14.00%



Dear Members,



thank you for the poll. I think we will manufacture a version with a

three-position toggle switch than can be used to define the division set,

i.e. three division sets will be available. All we (or better said: you)

have to do is to decide which three division sets are available :-)

As it's not a very challenging design (rather a routine piece of work) I

think it could be realized soon. We will built a prototype and then ask for

the desired dividing factor sets.



Best wishes

Dieter Doepfer





    
     

    
    


 



  






      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for Doepfer_a100

2010-03-16 by achtung_999

Thanks so much Dieter!
Shows again that you really listen to us, your customers!
I'm proud you're taking my idea into serious consideration ;-)
(and all the great additions the people on this list added!)

grtzz

Ernst




On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com>wrote:

>
>
> yes, that would be great.
>
> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
>
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner
>
> www. parallel - worlds - music. com
>
> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
>
> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
>
> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
>
> www. DiN. org. uk
>
> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
>
> www. vu-us. com
>
> --- On Tue, 3/16/10, yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo%40doepfer.de> <
> yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo%40doepfer.de>> wrote:
>
> From: yahoo@doepfer.de <yahoo%40doepfer.de> <yahoo@doepfer.de<yahoo%40doepfer.de>
> >
>
> Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for Doepfer_a100
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 11:34 AM
>
>
>
>
> > The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the
>
> > final results:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > POLL QUESTION: Would you buy the Doepfer A160-2 divider module
>
> > with Uneven (Odd) clock divisions?
>
> >
>
> > CHOICES AND RESULTS
>
> > - Yes, and i would prefer the one with all divisions /2 /3 /4 /5
>
> > /6 /7 /8 /9 (8 outputs), 13 votes, 26.00%
>
> > - Yes, and i would prefer the one with only odd (plus the /6
>
> > division) divisions /3 /5 /6 /7 /9 /11 /13 /15 (8 outputs), 21
>
> > votes, 42.00%
>
> > - maybe...., 9 votes, 18.00%
>
> > - No, not interested., 7 votes, 14.00%
>
> Dear Members,
>
> thank you for the poll. I think we will manufacture a version with a
>
> three-position toggle switch than can be used to define the division set,
>
> i.e. three division sets will be available. All we (or better said: you)
>
> have to do is to decide which three division sets are available :-)
>
> As it's not a very challenging design (rather a routine piece of work) I
>
> think it could be realized soon. We will built a prototype and then ask for
>
> the desired dividing factor sets.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Dieter Doepfer
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.