Doepfer

Still won't work on Mac though...
So I think a new version would be nice.





On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com>wrote:

>
>
> the old editor also works fine on windows 98, that's where i had it
> installed in my old PC, some years ago...
>
>
> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
>
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner
>
> www. parallel - worlds - music. com
>
> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
>
> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
>
> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
>
> www. DiN. org. uk
>
> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
>
> www. vu-us. com
>
> --- On Thu, 10/14/10, martindx100 <martin@teknofon.com<martin%40teknofon.com>>
> wrote:
>
> From: martindx100 <martin@teknofon.com <martin%40teknofon.com>>
> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-112 editor
>
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Thursday, October 14, 2010, 5:47 PM
>
>
>
>
> I did not mean it in a harsh way. :)
>
> But maybe it's something that needs higher priority,
>
> so that all functions of the A-112 will work.
>
> "My own opinion" is that if you can sell it as a
>
> up to date wavetable/sampler module, more people would buy it.
>
> But if it needs a 15-25 years old "vintage" computer
>
> to get it to work, less people will buy it.
>
> Not many people got a 286, 386, 486 or pentium with
>
> dos or win95(dos 7.0) laying around in their studio any more :)
>
> Best regards
>
> Martin S�rensen
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>,
> <yahoo@...> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > it�s bad customer support of doepfer not to make a new version of the
>
> > program :(
>
> >
>
> > Yes - we are known for our bad support. We have nobody in our company who
>
> > could do this job. The man who programmed the old dump program has left
> our
>
> > company many years ago. If anyone could offer the service to program such
> an
>
> > editor please let me know.
>
> >
>
> > Best wishes
>
> > Dieter Doepfer
>
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]