Doepfer

I'm very much in agreement here, VC of parameters make a much more
versatile module (any module) and I'm a big fan of AD or AR envelopes. 


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * *
David 


-----Original Message-----
From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of dancemachine
Sent: 09 June 2011 21:18
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100

I think I'd rather see a VC A(S)R module, or something with voltage
control.  does "slope parameter" mean shape control btwn log/lin/exp?
because that is definitely welcome, but I think that simpler VC
envelopes would prove more desirable to the market than complicated
non-VC envelopes

is this an option on the poll? :)

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:12 PM, <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the 
> Doepfer_a100 group:
>
> Should Doepfer release new envelope generator modules?
> Like ADDSR, AHDSR... with slope parameter for each phase.
>
> ADDSR= Attack Decay1 Decay 2 Sustain Release AHDSR= Attack Hold Decay 
> Sustain Release
>
> o No! The envelope generator modules already available are ok.
> o Yes! ADDSR, AHDSR and slope parameter for each phase.
> o Yes! but ADDSR it's enough...
> o Yes! but ADDSR with slope parameter for each phase it's enough...
> o Yes! but AHDSR it's enough...
> o Yes! but AHDSR with slope parameter for each phase it's enough...
> o Yes! ADDSR, AHDSR but no slope parameter.
>
> To vote, please visit the following web page:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?id=13087131
>
> Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are not 
> collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups web 
> site listed above.
>
> Thanks!
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links