Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Planning New System.

2012-11-13 by Bakis Sirros

that's why i also have a A116 in my modular system.    :-)

but, if i had to only have one, i would go for the A137, for sure of course.


 
Bakis 


________________________________
 From: Marco Mirri <marco.mirri@fastwebnet.it>
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Planning New System.
 

  
I own both A-116 and A-137-1, and I deeply agree with Ernst: A-137-1 is really an impressive waveshaper, especially before an H.P. filtering ation.
This doesn't mean that A-116 isn't useful: I still get great pleasure with it, but if you have to choose between 2 waveshapers ... probably A-137-1 is the right choice!

Marco

----- Original Message ----- 
From: isoldeandisobelle 
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:43 PM
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Planning New System.

Thank you, that is good advice - looks like I will have to lose at least one of the A-180's.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote:
>
> One advice: Take out the A116 waveform processor. That one is not so
> impressive. For drone music you are better served with using the A137-1
> wave multiplier. /Just my 2 cents
> I have owned an A116 and still own a A137-1 (with great pleasure!).
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Ernst
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM, isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@...
> > wrote:
> 
> > **
> >
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> >
> > It is mainly drone based music that I make, so slow and gradual modulation
> > is what I am after, although I am really hoping Santa brings me a Dark Time.
> >
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sedin <peterhksedin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > looks fun! yes.. lots of osc modules.. maby skip one a-110 and get a
> > > springreverb or any other effect like module?
> > > what are you planning on sequence with?
> > >
> > > 2012/11/13 isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@>
> >
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am planning on building this system -
> > > >
> > > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG]
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical
> > > > choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's
> > > > with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another
> > > > VCA.....any help much appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > Mvh
> > >
> > > Peter H.K Sedin
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> > 
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.