Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2012-11-13 by isoldeandisobelle
Hi, I am planning on building this system - [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG] Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another VCA.....any help much appreciated.
2012-11-13 by Peter Sedin
looks fun! yes.. lots of osc modules.. maby skip one a-110 and get a springreverb or any other effect like module? what are you planning on sequence with? 2012/11/13 isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@gmail.com> > ** > > > Hi, > > I am planning on building this system - > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG] > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical > choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's > with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another > VCA.....any help much appreciated. > > > -- Mvh Peter H.K Sedin [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2012-11-13 by isoldeandisobelle
Thank you very much. It is mainly drone based music that I make, so slow and gradual modulation is what I am after, although I am really hoping Santa brings me a Dark Time. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sedin <peterhksedin@...> wrote:
> > looks fun! yes.. lots of osc modules.. maby skip one a-110 and get a > springreverb or any other effect like module? > what are you planning on sequence with? > > 2012/11/13 isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@...> > > > ** > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I am planning on building this system - > > > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG] > > > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical > > choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's > > with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another > > VCA.....any help much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Mvh > > Peter H.K Sedin > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2012-11-13 by isoldeandisobelle
Thank you, that is good advice - looks like I will have to lose at least one of the A-180's. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote:
> > One advice: Take out the A116 waveform processor. That one is not so > impressive. For drone music you are better served with using the A137-1 > wave multiplier. /Just my 2 cents > I have owned an A116 and still own a A137-1 (with great pleasure!). > > All the best, > > Ernst > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM, isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@... > > wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > It is mainly drone based music that I make, so slow and gradual modulation > > is what I am after, although I am really hoping Santa brings me a Dark Time. > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sedin <peterhksedin@> wrote: > > > > > > looks fun! yes.. lots of osc modules.. maby skip one a-110 and get a > > > springreverb or any other effect like module? > > > what are you planning on sequence with? > > > > > > 2012/11/13 isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@> > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am planning on building this system - > > > > > > > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG] > > > > > > > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical > > > > choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's > > > > with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another > > > > VCA.....any help much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Mvh > > > > > > Peter H.K Sedin > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2012-11-13 by achtung_999
One advice: Take out the A116 waveform processor. That one is not so impressive. For drone music you are better served with using the A137-1 wave multiplier. /Just my 2 cents I have owned an A116 and still own a A137-1 (with great pleasure!). All the best, Ernst On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM, isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@gmail.com > wrote: > ** > > > Thank you very much. > > It is mainly drone based music that I make, so slow and gradual modulation > is what I am after, although I am really hoping Santa brings me a Dark Time. > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sedin <peterhksedin@...> wrote: > > > > looks fun! yes.. lots of osc modules.. maby skip one a-110 and get a > > springreverb or any other effect like module? > > what are you planning on sequence with? > > > > 2012/11/13 isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@...> > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am planning on building this system - > > > > > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG] > > > > > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical > > > choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's > > > with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another > > > VCA.....any help much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Mvh > > > > Peter H.K Sedin > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2012-11-13 by Jakob Paulussen
Hi, If I may add. The A-107 is nice however won't give you too much versatility sound wise. Instead I'd go for a combo of A-124 and A-108 or A-106-6 (if you insist on Oberheim xpander type filter). That way you can keep the mult regarding space too :-) Best wishes Jakob Am 13.11.2012 22:44 schrieb "isoldeandisobelle" <isoldeisobelle@gmail.com>: > ** > > > Thank you, that is good advice - looks like I will have to lose at least > one of the A-180's. > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> > wrote: > > > > One advice: Take out the A116 waveform processor. That one is not so > > impressive. For drone music you are better served with using the A137-1 > > wave multiplier. /Just my 2 cents > > I have owned an A116 and still own a A137-1 (with great pleasure!). > > > > All the best, > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM, isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@... > > > wrote: > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > > It is mainly drone based music that I make, so slow and gradual > modulation > > > is what I am after, although I am really hoping Santa brings me a Dark > Time. > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sedin <peterhksedin@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > looks fun! yes.. lots of osc modules.. maby skip one a-110 and get a > > > > springreverb or any other effect like module? > > > > what are you planning on sequence with? > > > > > > > > 2012/11/13 isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@> > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I am planning on building this system - > > > > > > > > > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG] > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a > practical > > > > > choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 > VCO's > > > > > with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include > another > > > > > VCA.....any help much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Mvh > > > > > > > > Peter H.K Sedin > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2012-11-13 by Bakis Sirros
yes, the A137 is a fantastic wavefolder, totally recommended! Bakis ________________________________
From: achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 11:15 PM Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Planning New System. One advice: Take out the A116 waveform processor. That one is not so impressive. For drone music you are better served with using the A137-1 wave multiplier. /Just my 2 cents I have owned an A116 and still own a A137-1 (with great pleasure!). All the best, Ernst On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM, isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@gmail.com > wrote: > ** > > > Thank you very much. > > It is mainly drone based music that I make, so slow and gradual modulation > is what I am after, although I am really hoping Santa brings me a Dark Time. > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sedin <peterhksedin@...> wrote: > > > > looks fun! yes.. lots of osc modules.. maby skip one a-110 and get a > > springreverb or any other effect like module? > > what are you planning on sequence with? > > > > 2012/11/13 isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@...> > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am planning on building this system - > > > > > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG] > > > > > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical > > > choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's > > > with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another > > > VCA.....any help much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Mvh > > > > Peter H.K Sedin > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2012-11-13 by Marco Mirri
I own both A-116 and A-137-1, and I deeply agree with Ernst: A-137-1 is really an impressive waveshaper, especially before an H.P. filtering ation. This doesn't mean that A-116 isn't useful: I still get great pleasure with it, but if you have to choose between 2 waveshapers ... probably A-137-1 is the right choice! Marco
----- Original Message -----
From: isoldeandisobelle
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:43 PM
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Planning New System.
Thank you, that is good advice - looks like I will have to lose at least one of the A-180's.
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote:
>
> One advice: Take out the A116 waveform processor. That one is not so
> impressive. For drone music you are better served with using the A137-1
> wave multiplier. /Just my 2 cents
> I have owned an A116 and still own a A137-1 (with great pleasure!).
>
> All the best,
>
> Ernst
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM, isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@...
> > wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> >
> > It is mainly drone based music that I make, so slow and gradual modulation
> > is what I am after, although I am really hoping Santa brings me a Dark Time.
> >
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sedin <peterhksedin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > looks fun! yes.. lots of osc modules.. maby skip one a-110 and get a
> > > springreverb or any other effect like module?
> > > what are you planning on sequence with?
> > >
> > > 2012/11/13 isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@>
> >
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am planning on building this system -
> > > >
> > > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG]
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical
> > > > choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's
> > > > with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another
> > > > VCA.....any help much appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > Mvh
> > >
> > > Peter H.K Sedin
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]2012-11-13 by Bakis Sirros
that's why i also have a A116 in my modular system. :-) but, if i had to only have one, i would go for the A137, for sure of course. Bakis ________________________________
From: Marco Mirri <marco.mirri@fastwebnet.it> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Planning New System. I own both A-116 and A-137-1, and I deeply agree with Ernst: A-137-1 is really an impressive waveshaper, especially before an H.P. filtering ation. This doesn't mean that A-116 isn't useful: I still get great pleasure with it, but if you have to choose between 2 waveshapers ... probably A-137-1 is the right choice! Marco ----- Original Message ----- From: isoldeandisobelle To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:43 PM Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Planning New System. Thank you, that is good advice - looks like I will have to lose at least one of the A-180's. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote: > > One advice: Take out the A116 waveform processor. That one is not so > impressive. For drone music you are better served with using the A137-1 > wave multiplier. /Just my 2 cents > I have owned an A116 and still own a A137-1 (with great pleasure!). > > All the best, > > Ernst > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM, isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@... > > wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > It is mainly drone based music that I make, so slow and gradual modulation > > is what I am after, although I am really hoping Santa brings me a Dark Time. > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sedin <peterhksedin@> wrote: > > > > > > looks fun! yes.. lots of osc modules.. maby skip one a-110 and get a > > > springreverb or any other effect like module? > > > what are you planning on sequence with? > > > > > > 2012/11/13 isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@> > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am planning on building this system - > > > > > > > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG] > > > > > > > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical > > > > choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's > > > > with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another > > > > VCA.....any help much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Mvh > > > > > > Peter H.K Sedin > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2012-11-14 by isoldeandisobelle
Thank you for the replies. I already have the A-107, which I bought for the morphing ability (wish the transition was a bit longer, but 10 seconds is fine.) I do plan to construct another smaller case to house filters in the future. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@...> wrote:
> > that's why i also have a A116 in my modular system.   :-) > > but, if i had to only have one, i would go for the A137, for sure of course. > > >  > Bakis > > > ________________________________ > From: Marco Mirri <marco.mirri@...> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:27 AM > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Planning New System. > > >  > I own both A-116 and A-137-1, and I deeply agree with Ernst: A-137-1 is really an impressive waveshaper, especially before an H.P. filtering ation. > This doesn't mean that A-116 isn't useful: I still get great pleasure with it, but if you have to choose between 2 waveshapers ... probably A-137-1 is the right choice! > > Marco > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: isoldeandisobelle > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:43 PM > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Planning New System. > > Thank you, that is good advice - looks like I will have to lose at least one of the A-180's. > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@> wrote: > > > > One advice: Take out the A116 waveform processor. That one is not so > > impressive. For drone music you are better served with using the A137-1 > > wave multiplier. /Just my 2 cents > > I have owned an A116 and still own a A137-1 (with great pleasure!). > > > > All the best, > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM, isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@ > > > wrote: > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > > It is mainly drone based music that I make, so slow and gradual modulation > > > is what I am after, although I am really hoping Santa brings me a Dark Time. > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sedin <peterhksedin@> wrote: > > > > > > > > looks fun! yes.. lots of osc modules.. maby skip one a-110 and get a > > > > springreverb or any other effect like module? > > > > what are you planning on sequence with? > > > > > > > > 2012/11/13 isoldeandisobelle <isoldeisobelle@> > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I am planning on building this system - > > > > > > > > > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG] > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical > > > > > choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's > > > > > with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another > > > > > VCA.....any help much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Mvh > > > > > > > > Peter H.K Sedin > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2012-11-14 by isoldeandisobelle
Hi, The reason I chose two A-145's was that I had one already and I prefer the slower cyclic speed of this module. Considering every-bodies useful replies, it seems I need to maybe reconsider my choices. Thank you. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Antonio Tuzzi <antoniotuzzi@...> wrote:
> > TOO BAD! > I've already bought the 2 VCOs version because of YOU!!!! > > :D :D > > On 14/nov/2012, at 10:32, Florian Anwander wrote: > > > > > > A-132-3 (two VCOs instead of one). > > I wanted to write "two VCAs" > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2012-11-14 by Florian Anwander
Hello basically a very nice concept. Is there a reason why you choose two A-145 instead of one A-143-3 with four LFOs? Drop at least one multiples and replace it with an inverter A-175 (now you get the falling ramp from the A-143-3) Replace the A-131 with an A-132-3 (two VCOs instead of one). A116 -> A137-2 as mentioned already Drop one 110 If you free space using a different filter module, then get a second mixer. Florian Am 13.11.2012 20:18, schrieb isoldeandisobelle:
> Hi, > > I am planning on building this system - > > [IMG]http://i50.tinypic.com/2sb9941.jpg[/IMG] > > Can anyone offer any advice/suggestions to whether this is a practical choice of modules - I was perhaps thinking I would not need the 3 VCO's with the Sub Harmonic Generator and perhaps I should include another VCA.....any help much appreciated.
2012-11-14 by Florian Anwander
> A-132-3 (two VCOs instead of one). I wanted to write "two VCAs"
2012-11-14 by Florian Anwander
> A116 -> A137-2 Today is my typo day... A116 -> A137-1 (not 2!)
2012-11-14 by Antonio Tuzzi
TOO BAD! I've already bought the 2 VCOs version because of YOU!!!! :D :D On 14/nov/2012, at 10:32, Florian Anwander wrote: > > > A-132-3 (two VCOs instead of one). > I wanted to write "two VCAs" > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]