Doepfer

Regarding the bipolar attenuators. Could I humbly suggest 'center detent'
pots?

Ernst

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jesse Buehler <pulsewidth2@hotmail.com>wrote:

> **
>
>
> I say keep the switches. I don't have th on my quad slope but I really,
> really wish it did! I'd rather an offset/attenuator for the far fewer times
> I've used bipolar outs.
>
> Ymmv of course.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Dec 14, 2012, at 4:49 AM, Martin Fay <martin@martinfay.com> wrote:
>
> > Bit of a late entry here, but there appears to be a choice between
> > including the cycle switch (not found on a stock STS DUSG) or a
> > bipolar output (present).
> >
> > Cycle can be patch-programmed with a patch cord from Gate to Trigger,
> > then if Gate is used for anything else it would need to be mult-ed.
> >
> > Bipolar can be patch-programmed using i.e. an offset/attenuator module.
> >
> > Is this trade-off worth a poll at some point?
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On 12 Dec 2012, at 15:11, <yahoo@doepfer.de> wrote:
> >
> > > As the negotiations with Serge and Ken Stone are nearly finished I
> > > decided
> > > to publish the preliminary info page about the planned module on our
> > > website:
> > >
> > > www.doepfer.de/a1712.htm
> > >
> > > Maybe we will add some features so that 3-position switches can be
> > > used
> > > (e.g. log/lin/exp instead of log/lin only and two different cycle
> > > modes).
> > > But these decisions depend upon the results with the first prototype
> > > which I
> > > expect in January 2013.
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]