Doepfer

Hello

Am 24.02.2016 um 11:37 schrieb yahoo ctujoao@yahoo.co.uk [Doepfer_a100]:
> I am probably not the only one who worries about the carbon footprint of their modular activity in general.
If you think in ecologic terms, then the worst part of the A-100 is the 
aluminum case. Followed by the all over energy waste coming with the 
production (especially the mining) of copper, required for all 
components and the pcbs.


I once wrote several articles about various topics on "cables" in the 
studio. Within that research I had an interview with a reseacher of the 
renowned eco institute in Freiburg/Germany, about the ecologic footprint 
of cables. He gave a simple example that they had investigated some 
years before:

It takes more energy to produce a power cable for an average home 
device, than this cable will transport in its whole livecycle (the 
example was a TV set, that was used one hour a day for 20 years). It is 
the same with cars: it costs more energy to produce a car, than you will 
ever put into driving it.

So the most ecological behaviour is: repair your car, so you can drive 
it as long as possible; and: take care of your modular synth and use it 
as long as possible. :-)

Florian