Hi Jonathan, If that is the matter what Ernst said. Your (masterclock) has to be steady, at a sudden tempo change the A160-5 will need a few pulses to adapt. However, this shouldn't be the point with the multiplier/ratcheting function. When sending different CV to the CV input it has to spit out the multiplied pulses direct and with no delay, so spot on. The last thing didn't happen with my A160-5 so that was where the faulty processor showed up. Make the basic patch like described in the manual and you'll notice right away. Best regards Jacco Ville > Op 23 okt. 2016 om 01:40 heeft achtung_999 heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven: > > Jonathan, you are like me before in this thread, mistaking the bit about the steady clock with the problem that Jacco was experiencing. > > Ernst > >> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Jonathan jss9h@aol.com [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote: >> >> Doesvthat mean there are lots of faulty microprocessors? I just assumed the one step latency was expected as stabilisation time for the mutiplication routine. Is mine faulty too? >> >> Jonathan Shapero >> From my iPad Air >> >>> On 22 Oct 2016, at 08:51, jaccoville@yahoo.com [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi there all, >>> >>> After having mail contact with Chris from Doepfer who offerd excellent service to take care of a new processor I couldn't resist also order a new A160-5 at Thomann. >>> Once installed in my system it worked like a charm, no latency issues or whatsoever. >>> Thank you again Chris for your help with this and with sending me the long >>> awaited update software for my A157's. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Jacco Ville >>> The Netherlands >> > >
Message
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A160-5 latency
2016-10-23 by Jacco Ville
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.