I just added a vote about the need for an attenuator. As I thought it, alternative 1 is something like what I proposed earlier with switches for maximum output levels 5/10/12/15 volts, pos and negative attenutation and two or more "channels". The second something more like a stripped two channels version of the a129/3 and alternative 3 some thing like a 4 width module for one channel. Perhaps like a 180 with just one pot, one input and three jacks out of the same. ----- Original Message ----- From: <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> To: <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:41 PM Subject: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100 > > Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the > Doepfer_a100 group: > > Would you like Doepfer to make an > attenutator module? > > Regarding more detailed layout we will > conduct a later survey about that. > > o Yes, an advanced one > o Yes, but only a basic dual attenuator > o Yes, but only a simple single > o Not sure > o No > > > To vote, please visit the following web page: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?id=11076862 > > Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are > not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups > web site listed above. > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Regarding the attenutator poll
2003-03-25 by Andreas Lindholm
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.