Doepfer

I would combine a low-cost VCA with the A140 for voltage control of 
envelope intensity. 

I'd also combine a low-cost vca (with dual signal inputs instead of 
dual CV inputs) with half a trigger modifier to produce a 4HP logic 
module (and, or, not).

I'd combine a two-channel mixer/attenuator with offset control, with 
an A150 switch to produce a comparitor.

Here's one I've mentioned before - I'd add individual outputs to 
the CV mixer to produce a quad VCA/attenuator/mixer. Oh yeah, throw in 
offset voltages and a moving-coil voltmeter :-)

Joe

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ilanode" <techmeier@w...> wrote:
> The suggested mixer sounds cool. But even more combined modules 
since 
> if you have a small system a dual S & H is of little use while a S & 
> H combined with a Slew Limiter would be great. The Trigger Delay 
> could be housed with a VC Switch for trigger signals (i.e. trigger 
> version of A150). One low cost VCA could go with VC Switch for audio 
> signals… And those having use for 2 S & H can live with 2 slew 
> limiters as well… Regards Ilanode
> 
> 
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander 
> <Florian.Anwander@c...> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> > 
> > I have two suggestions regarding new modules:
> > 
> > The first is an addon-Mixer for filters and similar modules: If I 
> want to
> > mix several CV _AND_ several Audio-Signals for one Filter, I need 
> two
> > Modules. But usually I do not need all four inputs of a mixer. So 
> my new
> > mixer consists of a three channel audio mixer and a two channel 
dc-
> mixer
> > for control voltages with an additional 1:1-feedthrough for the 
CV-
> Bus, and
> > finally a row of three Multiples to get additional outputs:
> > 
> > 
> >  o-POTI-+ /----o  -> to Audio-In
> >    log  | | 
> >  o-POTI-+-/ 
> >    log  |   /--o  -> to CV1-In   
> >  o-POTI-+   |  
> >    log      |  o
> >             |  |
> >  o-POTI-+---/  o  Multiples
> >    lin  |      |
> >  o-POTI-+      o
> >    lin  |
> >         ^ 
> >     from CV-Bus
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The other idea is, that I do not need double modules like the A170 
> or the
> > A162, or A175, A150, A148, A130. So the suggestion would be to 
> produce
> > combined modules, that provide different functions. Especially for 
> smaller
> > (3HE) systems it is annoying that you waste space with seldom used
> > functions.
> > 
> > Any oppinions?
> > 
> > Florian