Doepfer

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jvtalbert@y...> wrote:
> I was certainly one of the ones that voted FOR the 
> Mini-Schaltwerk!   And if I can't have a mini version, heck I'll 
just
> have to save up for the big one!  :-D

Hi John, I would reconsider that, unless you want to live in a fixed 
16th note world, that said, it allows you to see all of the tracks in 
your pattern at once. I just wish you could tied notes with the 
bloody thing a la tb303. Come on Chris, there is enough room to make 
this feature possible.


> 
> True, in one poll where the question was worded along the lines of
> "which modules should be completed next?" the Mini-schaltwerk was
> lower in the ranks.  However, in the poll where the question was 
posed
> separately as to whether Doepfer *should* release a SHALTWERK-LIKE
> trigger sequencer, the response was +80% in favor.

hopefully it will have the ability to tie notes.


> 
> Either way, having not had the pleasure to actually use a 
Schaltwerk,
> I don't really know if it would operate similar to an SH-101 (a 
quick,
> easy to use sequencer recorder).  

It would nice if the proposed module could use a midi keyboard to 
record notes in real time, nothing fancy and quantized to a 16th or 
32nd note.


Certainly, if that is how the
> original Schaltwerk works (only with 8 tracks instead of 1), then I
> would consider it to be a great unit to own at either size!   Just 
an
> idea.
> 
> Kindest regards,
> John
> 
> 
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Buechler" 
<buechlerjoe@t...>
> wrote:
> > Isn't this the proposed mini-Schaltwerk module? It hasn't got 
much 
> > support in the poll.
> > 
> > Joe