Doepfer

i don't think that dieter wants to develop two
different vu-meters. the "high-end" version will
still be cheap enough.

best wishes

self oscillate


--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" 
<andreas.k.lindholm@t...> wrote:
> The more technological aspects of this I don't really get, but 
audio capable
> is also nice. But as I see it it makes for a nice "high-
end "version. I
> think that would make sense for doepfer to make a basic version and 
a high
> end version (with attenuator as always ;)
> 
> /Andreas
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "klamb000" <lamb@c...>
> To: <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 3:17 PM
> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-136 CV question
> 
> 
> > Count me in again.  Joe's idea wins so far.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros
> > <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> > > hey joe,
> > > i want one like yours,too:-)
> > > bakis.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Joe Buechler <buechlerjoe@t...> wrote:
> > > > I'd like it to be a moving coil analog meter, and
> > > > illuminated. I'd
> > > > probably use it most for monitoring control
> > > > voltages, so I'd like it
> > > > to be DC-coupled, linear, with a positive/negative
> > > > display. It would
> > > > be ideal if it could also be switched to an audio
> > > > scale, AC-coupled
> > > > exponential with a positive-only DB scale.
> > > >
> > > > As far as having two, maybe it could be a dual meter
> > > > module.
> > > >
> > > > Joe
> > > >
> > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "klamb000"
> > > > <lamb@c...> wrote:
> > > > > Me too.  I'd like that's backlit.  I think one
> > > > shoud have at least
> > > > 2.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Kevin
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > "selfoscillate"
> > > > > <synaptic_music@y...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hello bakis,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yes, you are right ;-)
> > > > > > i would also prefer a doepfer-meter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > best wishes
> > > > > >
> > > > > > self oscillate
> > > > > >
> > > > > > p.s. by the way, how do you like the
> > > > technosaurus?
> > > > > >      does it really sound that good compared to
> > > > other modulars?
> > > > > >      i never gave it a try because i find it is
> > > > too expensive.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis
> > > > Sirros
> > > > > > <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > hi self-osc,
> > > > > > > no!.the doepfer A1?? vu-meter should be the
> > > > best
> > > > > > > choise ;-)
> > > > > > > bakis.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- selfoscillate <synaptic_music@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the analogue solutions vu-meter isn't
> > > > available
> > > > > > > > anymore.
> > > > > > > > the analogue systems vu-meter should be a
> > > > better
> > > > > > > > choice.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > best wishes
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > self oscillate
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > "unknown freak"
> > > > > > > > <cgraef@n...>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Have you considered getting Analogue
> > > > Solutions' VU
> > > > > > > > module?  It
> > > > > > > > would blend
> > > > > > > > > right into your rack.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > From: Bakis Sirros
> > > > > > > > [mailto:synth_freak_2000@y...]
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2003 4:56 PM
> > > > > > > > > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-136 CV
> > > > > > > > question
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > hi list,
> > > > > > > > > > isn't it sad to try to figure out what's
> > > > going
> > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > inside the a100 by watching the a170 or
> > > > a185 or
> > > > > > > > > > a175...little leds???(btw,i do the
> > > > > > > > same...).that's why
> > > > > > > > > > i have always proposed that we need a
> > > > vu-meter
> > > > > > > > > > module.so,if you think you need one(like
> > > > i
> > > > > > > > do)vote in
> > > > > > > > > > the vu-meter poll....
> > > > > > > > > > bakis.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- Joe Buechler <buechlerjoe@t...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Timothy, you're not the only one who
> > > > needs to
> > > > > > > > > > > correct himself five
> > > > > > > > > > > minutes after posting :-)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > That's how long it took me, adjusting
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > voltage
> > > > > > > > > > > from an A176 CV
> > > > > > > > > > > Source, and watching the LEDs on an
> > > > A170, to
> > > > > > > > > > > convince myself that the
> > > > > > > > > > > A136 does indeed process the A, +A,
> > > > and -A
> > > > > > > > paths
> > > > > > > > > > > independently, and
> > > > > > > > > > > then sums the result. My A132
> > > > suggestion was
> > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > wet.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If nothing else, I've learned a little
> > > > bit
> > > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > > > about the A136 today.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Joe
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > "Joe
> > > > > > > > Buechler"
> > > > > > > > > > > <buechlerjoe@t...>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Timothy, the A136 User's manual says
> > > > that
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > signal is split into
> > > > > > > > > > > > three parts, but no signal flow
> > > > diagram is
> > > > > > > > > > > provided. (This is only
> > > > > > > > > > > > the least of the problems with the
> > > > A136
> > > > > > > > > > > documentation). The
> > > > > > > > > > > > signal diagram on the module front
> > > > panel
> > > > > > > > suggests
> > > > > > > > > > > that the "A" gain
> > > > > > > > > > > > is applied BEFORE the signal is fed
> > > > to the
> > > > > > > > > > > positive and negative
> > > > > > > > > > > > clipping circuits. That's why I made
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > suggestion that I did.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I suppose I could spend some time
> > > > > > > > experimenting to
> > > > > > > > > > > determine the
> > > > > > > > > > > > actual signal path, but it's a
> > > > tedious
> > > > > > > > business
> > > > > > > > > > > without a scope. I
> > > > > > > > > > > > wish bakis would nudge Dieter to
> > > > describe
> > > > > > > > the A136
> > > > > > > > > > > signal path, and
> > > > > > > > > > > > correct all the errors in the User's
> > > > Guide
> > > > > > > > while
> > > > > > > > > > > he's at it.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Joe
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com,
> > > > "Tim
> > > > > > > > > > > Stinchcombe"
> > > > > > > > > > > <timothy@t...>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Joe,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the positive/negative gain
> > > > isn't an
> > > > > > > > issue,
> > > > > > > > > > > couldn't you just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > route
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the audio thru an A132 VCA and
> > > > get
> > > > > > > > voltage
> > > > > > > > > > > control of the gain
> > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > way?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Internally in the A-136 the signal
> > > > is
> > > >
> > > === message truncated ===
> > >
> > >
> > > =====
> > > synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> > > athens-greece
> > > [Doepfer_a100] group owner
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> > > http://search.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >